
New Zealand Relaxes Visa Rules To Lure Digital Nomads (theguardian.com) 65
New Zealand has relaxed its visitor visa rules to attract so-called "digital nomads" in a bid to boost tourism and the economy. From a report: Visitor visas will now allow people to work remotely for a foreign employer while they are visiting New Zealand for up to 90 days. The visa can be extended up to nine months but visitors may need to pay tax during this time. Economic growth minister Nicola Willis said making it easier for digital nomads -- people who work remotely while travelling -- to work in New Zealand, will boost the country's appeal as a destination. The visa would extend to influencers, as long as they are being paid by an overseas company.
Nice Place But Beware. (Score:5, Informative)
I've vacationed there twice and have thought long and hard about becoming an expat but I can't stand sand flies [touristclassnz.com] either. Regular DEET-based products don't repel them very well at all. You have been warned.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Nice Place But Beware. (Score:2)
It's part of a treaty we signed in the early years. We leave each other alone on the condition they can eat as many tourists as they like, but only in sumer, and only on the east coast of the South Island.
For the most part both sides adhere to the agreement.
Re: (Score:2)
For those of us who haven't read the fine print of the Treaty of Waitangi, it sounds like a fascinating document!
Re: (Score:3)
Despite the English introducing a lot of invasive species, a beautiful country. And it has Lucy Lawless.
I'm kind of tired of Canadian winters, I'll have to think about a move. Sand flies can't be as bad as our black flies. Legend has it some people go into the backwoods and afterwards you can't even find bones. It ain't the bears and wolverines you need to worry about, it's the blackflies.
Re: Nice Place But Beware. (Score:2)
If you go at this time of year, the time difference can be awesome if your employer is on the west coast of N. America: three hours behind (but on the next day). I once did a summer in Melbourne (5 hours behind PT): I could catch my American colleagues before they went to lunch, and I had Mondays to myself with no interruptions. Unfortunately, this doesnâ(TM)t work so well for Europe-based people.
Re: (Score:2)
Damn sand flies chewed me up while climbing up to Franz Josef glacier. Who do I contact about reparations?!?
Note: This was about six weeks prior to the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake.
Where to nomad (Score:2)
The Spinoff [thespinoff.co.nz] has an amusing and typically self-deprecating guide as to where to Nomad in Aotearoa.
Good intro at least to the local humour if you are even considering it.
On Fiordland and sandflies specifically, it notes:
Re: (Score:1)
But they're free food, lots of protein. Just rig up a DIY electric catcher net. (I personally don't like their taste, but some do.)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, their politics can haz the dumb, just like any other place. It doesn't detract though from the beauty or the earthquakes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
So that's why New Zealand produces such good dinghy sailors... they are just trying to stay away from the sand flies.
Re: (Score:3)
Few things are worse than getting caught in a dead lull for hours while being attacked by biting flies. I don't know what flies are doing so far out to sea but when the wind dies, there they are, out for blood.
Re: (Score:2)
As a Kiwi, sand flies aren't everywhere, but the worst place I've found for them in NZ was Haast on the west coast.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've vacationed there twice and have thought long and hard about becoming an expat but I can't stand sand flies [touristclassnz.com] either. Regular DEET-based products don't repel them very well at all. You have been warned.
Deet is for repelling mosquitos rather than flies.
And Un Zud isn't nearly as bad as Australia... one thing I have not missed by moving to the UK are the bloody flies.
Why tax them? (Score:5, Insightful)
Every bit of currency a digital nomad spends in your country is money entering your economy. Make sure they have their own health insurance, but tax? You're already winning, don't get greedy.
Re: (Score:1)
America is a case of the government actively working against the population in name of the corporations.
It is as bad as government actively working against the population in the name of the government, as you get with socialism.
Re: (Score:3)
What, you're a 'nomad' in a foreign country on a temporary visa. You've never taken out travel insurance?
The NZ government, like any country you're visiting, has no obligation to treat you free of charge if you become violently ill or are involved in an incident requiring hospitalization.
Re: Why have their own health insurance?!? (Score:2)
And good luck with a medical repatriation flight!
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of rights are limited, voting is a right here, but only for flesh and blood citizens. We have the right of freedom of mobility, but only for citizens and legal residents. Healthcare is also a right, but only free for residents.
Re: (Score:2)
They should have their own health insurance because they haven't been, and still are not, contributing to the local healthcare system.
Re: (Score:2)
Or save their money and not bother with insurance. They can pay out of their own pocket in the unlikely event something happens. No need to be extorted by the insurance mafia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is the local healthcare not funded through sales tax?
Re: (Score:3)
Fun fact, when I was traveling for my employer the cost of insurance for my employer would be insurance for all of the world excluding the USA, or all of the world including the USA. The optio
Re: (Score:2)
No.
I live here as a resident (eligible for citizenship next month), but when my appendix went pop a few years ago I was required to prove to the hospital that I was eligible for free healthcare treatment (by providing my visa and passport).
If I didn't have eligibility, I would have received a bill - they would have still carried out the life saving treatment however.
Family doctors here don't have to treat non-residents - those that do, can charge what they like, and as a non-resident you aren't eligible for
Re: (Score:2)
additionally for people visiting it's very important and a bit mind-bending to get your head around ACC [acc.co.nz].
so quite separately to the formal healthcare system, if anyone in the country at any time, no matter their immigration status or anything else, has an injury resulting from an accident, then they are eligible for free healthcare and treatment related to that incident.
Globally it's quite an anomaly of a system, but means for example that it is not possible in NZ to sue a healthcare provider for care result
Re: (Score:2)
ACC was enacted to stop the courts being bogged up with injury related cases - if you have an accident, doesn't matter where or why, so long as its an accident (ie its not just normal deterioration due to lifestyle etc), then its covered under ACC.
This means that if you have an injury at work, or on someones property, or out hiking, or cutting the grass etc, ACC covers it rather than having costly lawsuits between insurers or uninsured parties.
My wife slipped a disc in her back at work, while reaching acros
Re: (Score:2)
Family doctors here don't have to treat non-residents - those that do, can charge what they like, and as a non-resident you aren't eligible for subsidised medication either.
Interesting. Here in Canada, Doctors have to bill non-residents the same as they would bill the government.
Re: (Score:2)
Because taxes pay for health care. If you're here not paying taxes, please pay for your own health care, don't sponge off of our tax payer funded system.
Re: (Score:3)
This is the same argument for eliminating the personal income tax altogether.
The counterargument is government is a parasite and will kill you, if necessary, to steal your money, so they don't need to think about maximizing overall wealth or even tax revenues.
The US government had the largest surpluses prior to the personal income tax. Smart administrations built parks, canals, and roads. Dumb ones started wars.
Re: Why tax them? (Score:2)
Only taxing after 9 months, because they probably want to encourage the nomads to be nomadic.
Re: (Score:2)
Only after extending past 3 months, presumably seeking a balance with the rental market. i.e. You've probably heard about the backlash from locals against short-stay AirBNB in places like Barcelona.
short-stay AirBNB in places like Barcelona. (Score:2)
Barcelona is about as far away from NZ as you can get.
Re: (Score:2)
Rental shortages aren't limited to Catalonia, at least here in nearby Australia.
Re: (Score:2)
International tax treaties. Once you are in a place for 6 months you become a tax resident. Same thing happening in Thailand. Now to avoid the tax man you need to stay in places shorter times.
For some nomads I assume they do it more to avoid the hassle of trying to figure out how to file your taxes in different places, but I imagine most are doing it to evade taxation.
Re: (Score:2)
Ahh. From an accounting perspective you are a human within a political boundary wherever you go, might as well assign you to the one you spend most of your year in.
From a taxation standpoint, I'm not so sure it makes sense. Sure, you'd lose the tax income, but again, you've got this financial faucet draining wealth from another economy into yours as the nomad pays for accomodations and food etc.. That's worth something.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem just goes back to fairness; why does a nomad not pay taxes when a resident does? Why does a "superficial" tourist evade the taxes of their home country?
I've lived as an [US citizen] expat before and financially it was great... but extremely complicated. It gets even more complicated with nontraditional income. I tried to set up a business in Thailand to be legal... which cost me $6k in lawyer's fees and would cost an additional $3-5k per year for "accountants." Gave up and moved back to the U
Re: (Score:3)
> why does a nomad not pay taxes when a resident does?
Cash influx. Same reason tourists don't pay income tax even as they're collecting vacation pay - they earned and are paid in a different country.
The digital nomad programs popping up everywhere would tend to indicate economists think that's worth the lost tax revenue.
Re: (Score:2)
I imagine in Thailand the local gangster tax makes it difficult for an expat to run a business.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The difference is that a resident is recycling money already circulating in the local economy. A digital nomad is injecting money from an external source.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I suppose you won't be surprised to hear that in the Untied States the Congress declared that people cheating to qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit, which only the very poorest families qualify for, to be the top priority for the tax authorities.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually if all your income has already had tax taken from it, as is normal for people working as a regular employee, then you don't have to do a tax return unless specifically requested. The tax department will simply used the data from your employer and send you a refu
Re: Why tax them? (Score:2)
On the flip side, you might be able to exempt yourself from taxes back home, or use a tax treaty to reduce the liability. Itâ(TM)s very common for countries to demand taxes after a certain period of time, e.g. after six months. Tax residency is different to immigration residency too. Talk to an expert though.
Re: (Score:2)
This is about not taxing them.
It means you can come here on a visitor visa and continue to work remotely for your non-NZ employer without worrying about working visas and tax.
Are they also trying to lure GAF Nomads? (Score:2)
from across the ditch...
Full immigration amendment (Score:5, Informative)
For those interested, the full amendment to immigration instructions may be found in Amendment Circular 2025-02 [immigration.govt.nz].
A few things worth pointing out:
Re: (Score:2)
They're serious enough about point 2 to include it, but I'm very curious as to how they'd monitor or enforce it.
If I pop down to NZ for six months, spend my regular work week telecommuting, and never visit a zoo or tourist trap... just living there for that period would be tourism for me. Eating at the local restaurants, shopping at the local grocery stores, chatting with the occasional person... stuff I'd do here would still be newish just doing it while in a slightly different culture.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
"I'm here for the sheep. Show me the sheep."
Re: Full immigration amendment (Score:2)
Itâ(TM)s a beautiful country, do some research and have some flattering answers ready if the officer at the border asks questions about places you want to visit or wines you want to sample. It wonâ(TM)t be as difficult as visiting the US, but do make sure you donâ(TM)t come with so much stuff that you look like youâ(TM)re moving permanently.
Re: (Score:2)
So no route to permanent residence?
The issue with these kinds of visas is that you aren't able to build up things like a pension or buy property. It's not so bad if you can save significant amounts of money for when you go home, but NZ isn't a cheap country and there is always the risk that you meet someone and want to stay.
We KNOW! (Score:2)
Somebody told us DAYS ago.
How about reading what's already posted first?
No thanks (Score:2)
The Kiwis have proven on *multiple* occasions to be utterly insane when it comes to anything tech realted.