I program for fun as well as for work.
I used AI for a personal project but ran out of free credits.
Rather than carry on on my own, I am waiting for more free credits, because I do not want to waste time on the grunt work AI does for me.
That surprised me.

If only we could ensure benevolence, benevolent dictatorships would be the best way to govern the world.
Python has a benevolent dictator and I love it and do what I'm told, mostly.
I happily left the crazy anarchy of Perl for Python.
C++ has a personal schizophrenic Nazi who is getting crazier and crazier with age.

Editors become Slashdot Editors when they are lobotomized.

Interesting points about why batteries lose, that I had not even thought about.

But you miss the point that we don't have to get rid of every last ICE to save the world from global warming.
There will always be a few selfish people, we just have to tax them so they pay to remove more carbon than they generate.
It is high time governments put these taxes in place, but of course that will be unpopular among the stupid people, so is not happening.

Whether civilization survive comes down to whether there are more clever people than stupid people.
It's not looking good so far...

Psychology is a dangerous pseudoscience.

It must be banned until it is wholly rebased on science instead of on dangerous opinions.

TFS:
She got hot and this led to her receiving heat from her son, but not as much as one would normally expect, which is surprising but can now be explained.

But as long as we can keep driving our coal rollers, all is right with the world.

Congratulations, copyright cartel, on another heavy-handed action to support outrageous copytight terms.

So, what's the new URL ?

Pirating is morally justified until we get a 5 year copyright term, that does what copyright is meant to do - encourage creation.

I am not sure if you are confused or being disingenuous.

You wrote:
"Who specifically is being harmed by the lack of net neutrality?"
Which is answered by the comment you replied to:
"Except that removing net neutrality allows ISPs to CREATE that scarcity, by slowing resources they want to make you pay more for."

You wrote:
"There is no law that mandates or even references net neutrality, so I'm not sure what you're saying about the law."
And I was replying to your comment:
"There are legitimate reasons to oppose net neutrality laws, [...] " to point how obviously tenuous your objections were.
And that should have been pretty obvious.

1. We assumed some sense in government, meaning net neutrality would be assured. That's gone now.

2.Mighta, coulda, kinda. You are arguing for a well-framed law, not against the law.

Energy, water, phlogiston or whatever nonsense you make-works are telling us to save this week.

Okay then, Miss Wakeman, *how much* energy will it save if I delete 1 MB of emails ?

And if it is indeed totally negligible and you are talking shit, will you resign ?

This.
Stand up and be a man not a victim.

Your lame protestations should convince anyone that net neutrality laws are a good thing.

Learn some fucking science.