Please visit my stock tips site http://damn.it
It is all about shares like Raspberry Pi and Nvidia that I thought about buying but never got round to but that unfortunately have done very well since then.

My only miss so far is Spacex, but I think they will eventually also climb back up and disappoint me ( as long as I do not actually buy any shares in them ).

Disclaimer.
The author does not own any shares, stock, or financial interest in any of the companies mentioned in this comment. Damn it.

"It's precisely what i said and meant, and it was perfectly clear."

True, and it was also wrong and I stated why it was wrong.

I'm not responsible for your utter inability to follow a discussion.

"That's a non-sequitur. "

You made a stupid remark and I pointed out how stupid it was. That is very much a sequitur.

"I'm questioning how much use that is, really, in the wider context of replacing programmers."

It was a stupid remark. You cannot try and justify it by saying you mean it in an entirely different context.

Up your game.

"doing your own training for that".

I have a local LLM working as a coding assistant. I don't do any training, I just use it.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. Time to stop talking.

That something better exists has no effect on the utility of things I possess.

"Obviously, LLMs in their current form will not survive either, completely non-viable economically."

Utter nonsense.
Many people use local LLMs which cost cents per hour, and will continue to do so.

Try to avoid talking about stuff you do not understand and if you cannot, at least look up things. You can, still, use an LLM AI to help with that.

Interesting.

First people employed as programmers date from, say, 1945, so born in ~1925 and now ~101 years old.

Why study something "an AI can do for you" ?

"When Microsoft's developers and engineers sit down to ask an AI to code and then ask it to check its code and then submit it"

FTFY

> > Sam et al warn us to take actions that will save them from bankruptcy

  > What bankruptcy-prevention actions are they asking for?

Dirty Sam wants regulations to stop LLM development before the open models overtake "Open"AI.

And this distracts from combatting the actual threat to humanity from the development of actual AGIs.

Zuck has a record of bad decisions.
I think we can assume he's wrong about this.

"There is a widespread feeling within these companies that they're stuck in a race that risks catastrophic consequences for everyone, but can't stop unless everyone agrees to at once, because if they do, then the least scrupulous player will just take over the AI space."

Yes.
But that threat is not from these companies' plateauing LLMs, it is from new, actual AGI AIs, that they would be stupid not to be working on.

Sam et al warn us to take actions that will save them from bankruptcy, meanwhile they are working on producing the real threat to humanity.
*That* is what must indeed be regulated as soon as possible, genius Trump's opposition notwithstanding.

If in doubt, don't trust Sam Altman.

Whereas the rest of us believe that Dirty Sam et al are only now faking concern because their LLMs cannot continue scaling at any speed for much longer and their business models are therefore fucked.

AGI will one day be a threat. LLMs aren't. Dirty Sam is a liar.

Glad your brilliant metrics have proven that C code safer.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world have moved on to actually safer code.

Yes, it is measurable:

In the next x months, how many security issues of what level are found in the old code using tool y vs How many are found in the new code.