Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Thou doth not use thee thorn this day. (Score 1) 86

Language is always evolving. The English language that would be more or less mutually intelligible to current speakers is only ~500 years old. The current grammar, punctation, and spelling conventions are even newer. Anybody who has read English language documents written before the 19th century by the most educated individuals of that day will see numerous examples of spelling that would be "incorrect" by today's conventions. As for the semicolon, it was only first recorded in the English language in the late 16th century (it was a new introduction when Shakespeare was writing his plays).

There are various ways to indicate a pause or disconnection within a sentence. Both commas and dashes can fill a similar role to the semicolon. Which is used is a matter of convention. The reduction in use of the semicolon seems to be at least partially a reaction to the overlapping use cases of these punctuation marks.

There's always going to be a tension between linguistic evolution and the need for established convention. If there are no conventions, then comprehension suffers. If conventions are too rigid, it can be difficult to convey the correct message. New concepts and circumstances may require new or evolving conventions. It's not surprising that conventions would change in the computer age.

Pretty much this. English is a living language and I've seen it change significantly in the 40 odd years I've been speaking it... Let alone writings from Victorian times or earlier. Sherlock Holmes "ejaculated" quite a bit, but when that book was written the word meant to say something excitedly. Obviously it doesn't mean that any more and that book was written less than 140 years ago.

Even reading some Arthur C Clarke or Asimov today there are marked differences in the way English is used, the definition of words changed as the context is different to what we'd expect. However English, being English means a competent speaker can still tell what the word means due to the context.

Languages change and evolve, punctuation marks like the pilcrow or even entire letters like the thorn ("Ye" olde is actual the, that Y is not a Y but a thorn that has a TH sound) or the defunct letter zog (which is still in use in some names like Menzies, which can be pronounced "Mingis" because it's based on an older language). If the semi-colon goes the same way, then so be it.

Which is why English will remain the international language long after another culture rises to dominate.

Comment Re:BREAKING NEWS (Score 1) 108

people's access to public roads decreased!

No, people's access increased. The cost of accessing a street with a large motor vehicle increased. But if you take the bus you now get there on time.

Not just people getting there on time but deliveries are now faster and cheaper, as they're not spending as long stationary in traffic.

Comment Re:How is a 10% reduction in traffic a success? (Score 1) 108

That some shit numbers and I dont even live in NYC.

It's hard to understand for people who don't spend their lives researching traffic and road capacity, but the difference between perfectly smoothly moving traffic and complete gridlock is often only 15-20% depending on the road layout. A traffic management study where I live found that only an 13% reduction in cars would completely eliminate morning traffic jams on the highways and allow the highway to move at the rated speed.

10% is a roaring success, you can see that in the other number, 70% drop in noise complaints. That means there's a massive reduction in idiots honking their horn because they are frustrated at not moving.

I firmly believe that every traffic jam starts with just one arsehole who decides to do something contrary to the flow of traffic. When there is less traffic, the one arsehole cannot create as big of a wave in traffic as there is room for traffic to flow around them and adsorb the disruption. Even just 10% (which is huge considering the traffic you get in major cities like NYC, London, Sydney, et al.) would be enough.

Getting where you're going in a timely fashion relies on road users reading the conditions of traffic and fitting in with them.

Comment Re:Too bad Trump Cancelled the lab funding (Score 1) 101

President Donald Trump cut the lab funding.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fspectrumnews1.com%2Fca%2Fs...

You can't make a vaccine without trials and without labs.

Correction, the US can't.

Germany, Belgium, Denmark and the UK would jump at it. Modern pharmaceuticals are one thing that we can't produce well outside the developed world.

Comment Re:GOP is the best (Score 1) 70

Last year, the trolls/MAGA faithful would join BlueSky, spew their bile, then get blocked by everyone. Now, every four weeks, there's a report in US news claiming, BlueSky, is doomed, Doomed! While enrollment numbers slowly climb higher: It seems BlueSky has become too big to ignore. If one wants a message to reach people, BlueSky is a must-include method of delivery.

Now, right-wing fanatics are joining in large numbers and dominating the conversation on some posts. It's not quite 'Trump is the new messiah', more 'everything bad is caused by Democratic Party/leftists/progressives': Even more dishonest, given that main-stream media flip-flops between declaring GOP is the best government ever, and admitting that Trump's leadership is a dumpster fire.

Yep, last week (I think) there was an article here on /. that BlueSky was dying and TheAppFormerlyKnownAsTwitter was going gangbusters. I realised this must have been a paid advertisement when I saw the exact same article, almost word for word, in a British publication except they'd had the foresight to replace "America" with "Britain".

Comment Re:Who benefits? (Score 1) 154

So far the only group I see benefiting from this "AI" push are shareholders because of the promises (false, exaggerated?) being thrown around by their respective corporations. Everyone else is being affected negatively. In my opinion this is the largest snake oil operation ever put forth and it seems that people are starting to catch on, thankfully.

And if "customers" say no to AI, they'll just shove it down our throats even harder.

They've spent too much money on it for it not to become something we don't want but have to buy anyway.

Comment Re:AI is not the problem. (Score 1) 154

Donald Trump achieved his wealth by
- Refusing to pay bills - https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fstory...
- Deception https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusw.org%2Fbillionaire-tr...
- Refusing to pay workers - https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fblogs%2Fball...
- Suing thousands of businesses - https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fpages...

There is nothing capitalist about these approaches to gaining money by whatever means. These behaviors _should_ lead to jail, not riches. But you can't blame capitalism, this is more about corruption and greed and abusing the legal system.

Those methods are quite capitalist. It's just that they're not honest. He's cutting costs and forcing people to pay without receiving anything (law suits), that is the end game of capitalism.

It's mainly that people (mostly Americans) refuse to admit that capitalism need to be restrained. It's useful in some areas but left unfettered is just as destructive as any other extremist ideology.

Trump is a capitalist, he's literally selling your country's highest office as we speak.. the problem is that he represents the worst traits of capitalism.

Comment Re:No to AI customer support (Score 1) 154

Calling in and having to talk to a machine is awful. A bunch of pharmacies are doing this now. I ended up switching to a local non chain pharmacy with much less convenient hours, but a human actually picks up when you call.

You're having to call?

My pharmacy is entirely online, prescriptions delivered to my door. I go onto the NHS website, order my repeats and they're automatically sent to my nominated pharmacy who posts them to me. I haven't had any reason to call a shop in years, decades if we're talking about a chain store. For the most part if I need to speak to someone it's usually at the point where going into the store would be faster.

Time to abandon the 18th century I dare say.

Comment Re:They don't want the competition (Score 1) 58

Way too much music could easily be replaced by AI. The music industry is worried...

Whoa, are you honestly suggesting that 40 years of simplifying music, cookie cutter performers, formulaic writing and autotune have made a market where people can't tell the difference between human and computer produced music?

I guess they dug their own graves here.

I think the music industry's problem isn't that AI is producing music, getting rid of the human elemet is a wet dream of music execs. Computers don't get drug habits, they don't have delusions of grandeur and think they don't need a label, they don't have mental breakdowns... the problem is they don't control the technology. Can't have people making their own music, 40+ years of suppressing small and independent artists would have been for nought.

Comment Re:$4.20 / ride (Score 1) 77

Ah yes republicans and legal weed, mix as well as oil and water.

A Pew Research poll last year found that 42% of Republicans are in favor of legalizing recreational pot. 72% of Democrats are in favor.

Pew poll on legalizing marjijuana

You've got to remember that the Republican party is now completely controlled by the far right (religious and/or racist right). They're a small majority (10, maybe 20% of registered republicans) but without them the republicans will never see power again so they control the party and are fully aware of it.

They're also the "drugs are bad mmmmmm'kay" crowd, so regardless of what the majority wants it will remain illegal.

Comment Re:Why only for cities and companies? (Score 1) 33

People first. I should be able to buy a self-driving car and schedule it to do taxi duties on Uber/Lyft when I don't need it. This is no need to involve government incompetence or corporate greediness.

Because when it doesn't work properly or has a limited service area you'll sue and demand the full purchase price back... or your family will sue for even more when you decided not to monitor your "self" driving car after you got drunk and told it to take you home whilst you had a snooze or fucked around on your phone.

This is bog standard liability limitation, not a government conspiracy.

Comment Re:They could do that? (Score 1) 105

I know in Canada that would never fly.

Yes but Canada has those pesky workers rights laws that prevent honest, hard working company executives from fully exploiting their chattel... erm, I mean employees.

That is just the thin end of the wedge, let that kind of thinking loose and what's next... Saying "aboot", Canadian style health care, Canadian happiness... Moose and Beavers living together. Chaos

Comment T.A.C.O. (Score 1) 136

Trump Always Chickens Out.

Within two weeks a newly manufactured outrage will push this out of the 24 hour news cycle so the MAGA faithful don't notice that he's chickened out yet again. Russia is dependent on Iranian made arms so they won't let their tame American government do anything to jeopardise that.

Slashdot Top Deals

This is now. Later is later.

Working...