It is not a Ponzi scheme and never was, where did you get that dumb idea? What you are whining about is the decrease in youngins paying into the system. It seems Americans are not fucking like they used to and a good number of them somehow think that immigrant dogs and cats are coming here and eating the native population.....errrr.....well, it is something like that.....I recall words to that effect in the last election.....or maybe it is because boys are going to school and coming home as girls. These and other brain-damaged ideas were brought to you by Dear Leader. That last idea is a doozy; these and others are from the whack-job Americans thought they wanted in the last election.

One easy fix for social security is to allow in more immigrants. You know the ones, the ones already here are cowering in fear from la Presidenta's Geheime StaatsPolizei, look it up if it doesn't ring a bell, but maybe they'll come by and ring yours before too long. Be sure your papers are in order; your neighbors might be prepared to denounce you.

There are other fixes, as someone below me mentioned, we could remove the cap on pay used to calculate Soc. Sec. payments (currently $184,500 but will rise to $192,300 in 2027). We can increase the ages at which soc. sec. starts. But we'd have to be careful with that one. Someone banging on a keyboard all day will be in better shape at 65 that someone working construction. We can also increase modestly the tax rate for Soc. Sec. and Medicare

We can also means test Soc. Sec. If you are sitting on a bundle, then you are already getting income from the rest of America through investments. Being rich does not mean you are special. it only means you are rich.

Is that where Musk's $44bn from Twitter go? Spun out of SpaceX, who bought it from xAI, who bought it from X using money funnelled from Tesla who in turn are subsidised by sales to SpaceX?

This is not a chicken and egg problem. It's an analysis problem. SpaceX built rockets for reasons started by government incentives and prizes to get new rockets designed. Once their rockets were designed customers also came flooding in. They'd be doing perfectly fine without Starlink. Starlink came almost a decade after SpaceX's first launch and the first Starlink constellation went up 2 years after SpaceX was already handling commercial and government contracts using second hand (reused) boosters.

Starlink on the other hand needed a very cheap launch vehicle to be viable and it wasn't even a conceptual idea before that happened. We very much know which came first.

EA has no money to invest. Thanks to a leveraged buyout all they have is a huge debt to serve. They will keep doing this by milking what they have while rapidly selling off or cost cutting their way to bankruptcy.

I see, so GrandMa and GrandPa can come and live with you, yes? You have room. And no sneaky asking for their Medicare, no gov. assistance for you.

BTW: Their meds are very expensive, so save your pennies.

Normally you just post about how you don't understand what statistics mean. It's refreshing to see you have no idea about history either. I mean there are actually "movies" you could cite which would relate to what you are talking about, but the two you chose are not them. Try again. At least you're on the right continent though.

The cops had nothing to do with that. For the general populace that change was pushed a lot by Facebook which at the time pushed its service as a way of connecting to real people at your college. But even then you have rose coloured glasses on. Remember the advice? I think the advice came *after* the internet of old. These days very few people use their real name online unless you have a public facing personality and that "blue check" is a source of income for you. On the other hand if you look to Slashdot UIDs in the sub 10000 you'll find a significant number of them actually do use their actual real name.

I remember the early days of the internet. Everyone (including me) was very naïeve about the concept of privacy and security.

This is not a good development. This is from an alleged administration whose titular head of obtuseness wondered during Stupidity 1.0 why the military or police could not just shoot protesters in the legs.

Sorry but no. Phishing and fraud existed before the "normies" did, and there are a significant number of very stupid and naïve tech gurus out in the world as well whose idea of privacy and security amount to "Who? Never met them." I mean the early internet by design considered no aspect of anonymity, privacy, or security.

Take the rose coloured glasses off.

Quit? Oh man you should have lived in Europe. You'd probably have been able to retire on the payout the courts would have given you.

Oh they very much are anonymous. At least they are where I live. If they weren't (I really hope they aren't and would love to prove it) my employer would find themselves financially arse-fucked by the courts and I will be able to retire early and rich.

In the olden days the chip in your CPU was made from different materials assembled in a different way than today. Not all silicon is the same, not all transistors are the same. There's a reason why some devices burn out at 75C junction temperature, and others can stand easily over 150C.

Also we don't measure temperature the same as we always did. That 80C in your "olden days" CPU... it probably is the same 100C as your current one. Multi-point precision on die temperature sensing is something from the past decade (and change).

That for sure. Tesla's marketing team seems to be Musk's twitter feed and that's too busy being a far right asshat than actually promote his cars. Whoope de do his car can jump. That's irrelevant, what is irrelevant is cars in my price category, and the reality is I legit wouldn't have known about the model Y refresh if I didn't see one driving down the road, and the Model 3 if my friend didn't recently buy one.

Tesla barely has any marketing of their vehicles compared to other cars.

Please don't, the last time they redirected resources it resulted in them stalking a customer on the other side of the country resulting in them being placed in the annals of stupid corporate espionage history.

Here is some footage of the device in action. It was originally thought to be lethal because of the water, but that was mistaken understanding.

It's not always harmless.