Comments were made on the actual topic, remote frontier-level models.
Claims by the moron were made, yes.
When the moron was pointed to the sources of the same remote frontier-level models that are available for inspection and asked to provide evidence of the claim, the moron engaged in every logical fallacy known.
What didn't the moron do? Yes, they did not provide evidence.
Why? Because there isn't any, as exhibited in the first post on topic already, where an immediate derivative of a frontier model from the same source, freely downloaded from behind that very same China firewall and freely available inside it showed no "handicap by training" whatsoever.
But the moron persists, and the squirming is amusing :))))