Comment Re: Let me fix this for you (Score 1) 98
These points are all flawed, and if I thought you wrote them, or even understood them yourself, I'd bother writing a full rebuttal.
These points are all flawed, and if I thought you wrote them, or even understood them yourself, I'd bother writing a full rebuttal.
Not half as violent as allowing obsolete approaches and flawed architecture to remain out of some weird combination of concern for backwards compatibility and sentimentality.
Python 2 users were supported for more than a decade after 3 came out, and there was a LOT of migration tooling released. CIOs may not want to be forced to upgrade too often, but if they think upgrading once every 10 years is too much, then they need to quit and get into something more aligned with their expectations. Perhaps blacksmithing.
that you're speaking off, dear sirs? Never seen this feature in my feeds.
It is a problem of the user, as we've seen demonstrated again and again.
You use a software called "personal home page" for your entrepreneurial infrastructure?
Sorry.
Like trying to sell Alaska back to the ruzzkie piecemeal.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Farchive.ph%2FHvkyV
So?
Hehe, dumbfuck rightwing nutjob bonehead, you've never asked me for evidence
All I've seen from you is whataboutism and lies.
But I've asked you for evidence and you have continuously failed to come up with any many times.
If the FBI had evidence there would be criminal charges.
LOL, sure, as if the FBI doesn't hide evidence as a matter of course.
In the Sacramento "eco-terror" bombing
In the Steven Hatfill "anthrax" case
Protecting mob bosses, e.g. Whitey Bulger
Hid the photos from the murder of Alex Pretti
And, most naturally, the *redacted* Epstein files.
Few rotten apples, one spoonful of shit in a pot of honey, that kind of thing.
I ask for evidence from the people who claim to have evidence.
The people who claim to have the evidence are the FBI. Show us evidence you ever asked them, bonehead
There are loopholes because literally nobody wants to pay more for benefits in the distant future.
And it isn't quite "a start", it is more of an act of posturing, which does literally nothing to address the CO2 emissions, while creating false feeling of smugness that something's being done among the people who like the badges and not the substance behind these.
But above all, it is an import tax to protect some domestic manufacturer or other.
No negative feedback. Try running an opamp without one or with a positive fb (yes-men) and see what you get.
Same here, except without the few useful applications that the positive feedback circuits have.
but we've know that for many millennia.
why don't you "merely ask for evidence" your people who redacted the files and tell us what happens, eh?
trump removed sanctions from russia and continues to disarm and pressure Ukraine to surrender to putin, so it is your friend, not ours.
sorry.
2) Hasn't every President lied? - tu quouqe
3) Trump stopped talking to Epstein in '04 - a lie
4) If whoever he accused of treason was actually treasonous, - double standards
5) Yes - yes, of course. 5 mil paid, soon 88 mil more.
So, you see, all you can respond with are logical fallacies. Case proven
Also, go buy yourself a dictionary, you need one.
Pie are not square. Pie are round. Cornbread are square.