Here is a little TL;DR on how argumentation works:

1. make your claim
2. back your claim with evidence

If you do #1 without #2, you are not going to convince anyone that isn't a mouth-breathing window-licker like yourself.

It's not my responsibility to prove your claim for you. That's your responsibility, and if you were not a mouth-breathing window-licker, you would already know that and wouldn't just post additional baseless weapons-grade bullshit as some kind of reinforcement of your argument.

Let me give you an example of how fucking stupid you are: quotes of Democrats, specifically the Obama Administration saying exactly what you are asking for:

America’s “red line” regarding Iran is that Tehran does not attain nuclear weapons, US President Barack Obama said on Thursday.

Today, because America negotiated from a position of strength and principle, we have stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in this region. Because of this deal, the international community will be able to verify that the Islamic Republic of Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon.

Furthermore, here is a direct quote of the House Minority Leader (Hakeem Jeffries, who will be Speaker of the House soon enough) giving you exactly the quote you want:

I know none of this is going to convince you - you probably aren't even going to read it in favor of compulsively complying with more unsubstantiated horseshit because you are a propagandized hayseed incapable of any intellectual objectivity. I'm hoping other people read this so they can laugh at you for being so ridiculously uninformed, or just a pathologically lying asshat hiding behind anonymity because your lies are so easy to see through.

Because deals cannot be extended?

Do you know how negotiations and diplomacy work even at the most superficial level?

It doesn't look like you are ever going to figure out what "on topic" means.

Hint: you are talking about genitals in an article about AI. Please stop being the dumbest motherfucker alive.

More goalpost moving that has nothing to do with the topic.

Thanks for proving you have no argument except bad faith arguments.

So you completely misunderstand how your "whataboutism" to a completely orthogonal topic (i.e. goalpost moving) is a bad faith argument, meant to distract from the question you don't want to answer.

And then you go on with the bad faith argument.

Nice try, but not everyone around here is as stupid as you, and can recognize your weak shit for what it is.

The sheer tonnage of irony of this cuck spewing right-wing dipshittery while accusing others of being "drowned in Media Propaganda" would stun a John Deere in it's tracks.

So will running it out of diesel fuel because the farmer is bankrupt from having his soybean market taken from him, his fuel input costs doubled, and the importation of 300 million tons of mystery meat that would never pass USDA inspection that he has to contend with; but what are ya gonna do?

What's jarring is if you go back and look at footage from the primary debates in 2016 just how far he's deteriorated. He used to at least tie together a few coherent sentences in a row. Now it's all sundowning gibberish.

The Republican Party should be indicted on elder abuse.

Nowhere except in the sweatiest of fever dreams, is anyone talking about "trans everywhere" and "compulsory" except you.

Why are you lying about what people's positions are? Can't argue against their actual positions, so you need to stand up a giant straw man to knock the hell out of?

Dipshit.

What is hilarious is that many polls show this to be an issue that only 2% of people care about as anything they would vote on. These people are chasing literal non-issues because they lose, and lose big on the issues that voters actually give a fuck about:
- war
- cost of living
- health care
- not being killed by out-of-control federal immigration agents with zero jurisdiction over citizens
- not being fleeced by corrupt swamp creatures that pledged to "drain the swamp"
- not being fucked over by stupendously moronic tariffs, levied by a guy who has no clue who actually pays the tariffs
- not being fucked over by an idiot who starts wars for conditions that only exist due to his complete ineptitude
- not wasting vast sums of money on ego stroking projects like billion dollar ballrooms and an arch nobody asked for
- not fucking over monuments that already exist with chemistry defying stupidity, blamed on (apparently) ninja vandals that can somehow carve 200-foot gashes in the bottom of a pool with nobody noticing, and no camera footage when there are cameras pointed at it 24/7

I could go on, but I don't think I need to.

Of course he uses it. How else could he churn out such slop as:
- him depicted as the Pope
- him depicted as Jesus Christ
- him depicted as some 5-star general with a shitload of ribbons on his chest after being a 5-time draft dodger
- him depicted as having a conversation with George Washington
- all his other racist, idiotic, moronic drivel

This is why he doesn't see any issue with AI: for all he knows, it's just for making stupid videos of him dumping literal shit on protesters - but remember, this is the guy who proclaimed he would bring free speech back while banning journalists for being mean to him in the press.

Thanks for proving that you have nothing but goalpost moving.

Trump is never going to see you being his water boy. He will never know your name, and doesn't care if you exist or not. Why would you constantly defend someone like that?

Why have you made his plain and obvious stupidity your identity's locus?

Oh, the nukes they never had? And swore to never pursue creating / obtaining in any way in the JCPOA that was thrown in the trash?

Who trashed that, by the way?

Who created the current environment for Iran to be enriching towards weapons grade, when they weren't before, as proven by IAEA inspectors that had access to see what they were doing under the JCPOA?

Who bombed Iran, and claimed "obliteration" of their nuclear program? Was that a lie? How can it be obliterated, and then have a functional nuclear explosive only 4 years from now?

Is Trump going to be upset that you don't believe his "obliteration" lie, and that's why you posted anonymous? Or did you post anonymous because you know you're a massive idiot and don't want to be flamed for it?

Also, it's an interesting path to cut where you are blaming Democrats for the hypothetical Iranian nuclear weapons "they could have done something to stop" when THEY LITERALLY DID STOP THEM, and you dumb motherfuckers voted in the guy that made it possible again. Then voted for him again. And are now carrying his water for a war nobody wanted, based on weapons-grade bullshit and lies that you suck down like Coca-Cola.

Please unplug from the Internet for a while, and go get professional help. You can't even reconcile your own bullshit with yourself.

I am absolutely sure that zero history books are going to mention anyone on this pathetic run-down version of a 1950s motel along Route 66 in a ghost town nobody remembers, nor cares about.

Please reacquaint yourself with easily observed reality, for all our sakes.

Past good doesn't excuse current shitty.

Save the "net good" bullshit for the eulogy. We care about what people do in the present.

[Citation needed]

Please quote one elected Democrat -- literally anywhere, at any level of government -- that has said they want Iran to have nuclear weapons.

Fucking clown.