Yes, Grok absolutely operates under "strict neutrality rules" because the owner would NEVER manipulate anything to his own ideology ... ...

Do you actually believe his horseshit? Are you really that daft?

Do you believe this horseshit equally about Meta?

Do you suffer from extreme myopic vision of easily observed reality?

It will help Senator Tommy Tuberville continue his marathon stretch of not reading anything so as to not taint his opinion.

That's not even a joke. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Fraw-i...

Which type of government has consistently been for the people?

Would you rather we just go direct to the bone and call him a white supremacist psychopathic lying cunt?

I'm pretty sure "weirdo" was a massive layer of gloss being applied to him being a white supremacist psychopathic lying cunt.

The two development models are as different as night and day.

SpaceX indexed on rapid iteration and tolerating catastrophic failure to learn from it.

Remember, NASA didn't exactly have a flawless execution record either - they blew up a LOT of early rockets that just didn't have people on them. They also launched Saturn III rockets unmanned to test systems before putting people on the scaled up Saturn V - in fact, the Apollo 7 mission was not launched on a Saturn V because it was only going to orbit. And they still killed a few people on the pad (Apollo 1 incident).

By the way, in case you think I'm some Musk fanboy, I hope he gets antibiotic-resistant chlamydia so he can have burning urination for the rest of his days.

RO wastes water. A really efficient rig only wastes about (side note, why the fuck does Google always think I'm trying to write "Scott" for "about"? Talk about a failure of statistical analysis) 8 gallons for every gallon produced... Not a big deal for most households for drinking water, and it can still go to the garden, but a big problem for a whole house system.

Training the robots' models in a simulation before training them in the real world won't make them safer. In fact if anything it will make them less safe due to their earliest training being subtly different from reality. What it does is make it cheaper and less dangerous to train them, and faster because you can run the simulation faster than reality.

"Women prefer Waymos over creepy Uber drivers."

I'd rather risk a low speed collision than a high speed rape

Don't need FSD for that. AEB will do that job, AND BETTER, because everyone who isn't Tesla uses more suitable sensors.

That might work where they are competent like Japan, but it won't work anywhere in the USA. Our road workers are like drunk toddlers compared to theirs.

Humans being forced or coerced into driving when they shouldn't is not humans being bad drivers, they aren't given the chance to do their best. It's capitalist society being bad at enabling good driving.

You're confusing two things, what your professors told you about how a functional economy works, and what capitalism is.

The fact is that pure capitalism doesn't work sustainably, so you have to do un-capitalistic things to sustain it. Antitrust is one of those.

Meat does something useful.

Also as long as they are close enough for you to experience noise pollution, which is the case for some of these AI DCs already

Also irrelevant to the argument at hand

Learn to stay on topic