Who cares how many die, that's your problem. I also think it's naive to say that AI researchers "don't know" how modern AI, i.e. transformer models, work. They know, it's just impossible to predict results given the immense size of the models. What they don't know, because they don't care, is why models generate such catastrophic results at times. Once upon a time, AI research would consider this their highest priority, not anymore.

So who exactly has AI killed so far?

What catastrophic events has it caused?

Genuinely curious....

I've been experimenting running mistral small models locally on a M4 Mac mini 24GB....with ollama. So far that seems to work nicely for what I'm doing with it so far....

I always check the weather report. No need to wear your nanotech except on days with nerve gas.

Who was telling them that if they treated ectopic pregnancies they might face legal repercussions? Is that what the law actually said?

The way the law is written, if a doctor performs any abortion they can be charged. That is what the hospitals legal department said. In 2024, a woman was told it would be a crime to perform her abortion, so she was left to die.

In 2023 another woman died because the procedure that could have saved her life after a miscarriage was not administered because it could also be used for an abortion.

Just this year, a woman who had previously had two stillbirths due to preeclampsia asked if she should continue with her pregnancy as she was experiencing the same preeclampsia as before. Nope, she was good to go. Until she was found dead in her bedroom from preeclampsia.

But sure, keep making excuses for why women have to die because Republicans don't care about them.

Metaphors can be a tough business.

Hmm, I hadn't noticed. Why didn't author post something in the main readme? If anyone knows which might be taking the crown, please post... Aris recommends

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FQNetITQ%2FWav...
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FMrOtherGuy%2F...

Anyway, I have Aris-t2's working fine, and yes, with a separate search box, just like you, with every Firefox through now 154. Also tabs on bottom, square tabs, and other stuff. Will update to 157 soon so maybe it will break at that point. I hope not.

Who was telling them that if they treated ectopic pregnancies they might face legal repercussions? Is that what the law actually said?

I believe you'll find it was the people who opposed the law who waged a campaign of disinformation to try to convince people that women would not be able to get life saving care. Turns out there are actual dangers to lying to slander your opponents when it's about what kind of medical treatment is available.

So lesson learned, going to be very careful not to mischaracterize in the future right?

The article OP cites is about a policy study for a policy that no one has so far enacted or voted for. How does that become proof that "they don't care about people and this lawsuit should be thrown out." How did you extrapolate the "they"? How did you manage to impart motive into every member of that collective based on an unfulfilled hypothetical? How did that lead to being able to seek an injunction on AI? Have you established it is the same "they" in question? And when the "they" has a position you don't like it become a prohibition on any action they could possibly take? How does that work in general?

Pennsylvania has a democratic governor, democratic house, democratic senator, voted for Obama, Obama again, and Biden. Their measles outbreak is laid up as a Republican failing? Why isn't Florida much worse then? Canada has been having thousands of cases to they point they lost their measles elimination status. Who is in control of Canada?

Sure, but that example has nothing to do with with the technology examples I and the OP gave. If you were trying to make a deeper point than providing a counter example that doesn't seem to fit, then please elaborate.

I learned to touch type on an Apple ][e because elementary school had them. But my parents didn't make the kind of money it took to buy an Apple or Mac back then, so I ended up on the PC track. By high school and college all my schools had PCs because clones were cheap and software was plentiful, and there was an assumption that PCs would continue to be dominate in business in the near term.

If you don't want their to be only two choices that serve corporate masters then you must: vote, protest, and be prepared to withhold your labor (general strike).

Republicans and the Heritage Foundation have made it their mission to make Unitary Executive Theory more than a theory. It's more than partisanship, it is a dedication to a radical ideology.

Ah, so when Jesus said "Love God" what he ACTUALLY meant was: act as if you love God, regardless of how you feel inside. Even if you outright hate the bastard, so long as you put on a good show of loving behavior you will be able to hang out in heaven and watch as he tortures your friends in fire forever.

That checks out, since this technique of explaining that the speaker ACTUALLY meant something totally different than what they plainly said is a foundation of Biblical interpretation.

When Paul told Timothy that "God saves all men, especially those who believe" what he ACTUALLY meant was "God wants to save all men, but only saves those who believe"

When James said "You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone." what he ACTUALLY meant was the exact opposite: "Faith alone justifies, but we can expect that any faithful person would show good works."

And when Jesus said "The coming of the kingdom of God can't be seen. People won't say "look, it's over there" or "look, it's over here", because the kingdom of God is within you." what he ACTUALLY meant was "I am standing right here!"

Once you make a habit of totally changing what people say so that it fits your narrative about what they should have said, everything clicks right into place.

They could vacuum-pack the product or fill it the package with nitrogen. No oxygen = no browning.

They already fill potato chip bags with nitrogen to stop the oil from going rancid.

I'm not seeing that. Lots of rounded GUI elements, but the viewport (meaning where the actual web content is displayed) is still a rectangle for me.

I kind of like the new look, but it's /. tradition to shit all over Firefox, so meh.

I'm not buying one until it's 39 cents again.

>"Can you turn it back to rectangular tabs in tool/settings"

I doubt that. And themes only change colors and backgrounds.

But you can make actual changes with Userchrome. It takes a bit of effort, though. I have my tabs square and always outlined and against the content, in a traditional way, using it.

https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.userchrome.org%2F
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FAris-t2%2FCus...