Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Of course, their AI is working from CCP doctrin (Score 1) 175

Of course, the commissar engages the most often-used tricks in the Soviet political discourse trying repeatedly to strawman me ...

Again, psychological projection. The straw man is the local "modest" models you introduce. That is the goal post move here.

A: I know China lies about shit, ...

You left off the relevant "their own internet", a reference to the Great Firewall, which I refer to.

Chinese AI is handicapped by training that has to conform with Chinese Communist Party doctrine and revisionist history.

Which is a reference to the Great Firewall, and the AI that will integrate with it. Ie the remote frontier-scale models.

All you have done is document your misunderstanding. Your tangential strawman of local "modest" models.

Comment Re:Maybe difference is apparent with basic science (Score 1) 108

If it's that simple, then it should be pretty easy to show mathematic proof.

We already have relatively low power devices that essentially cool via IR radiation.

But don't bother, because you've already lost the argument: As with all things SpaceX that people claim are impossible until SpaceX actually pulls it off (and has over a dozen times now) they're talking about whether it's cost effective, not whether the physics works.

SpaceX is not rewriting the rules of physics. They are rewriting the rules of engineering.

No competent person is arguing that it can't physically work.

Actually highly competent people are arguing against space based data centers as an alternative to ground based. There will be AI processing in orbit, but it will generally be for local in orbit needs.

SpaceX has done this so many times with so many things ...

Getting reusable rockets to land on their tail, turning the decades old sci-fi into reality, was a matter of engineering. The difficulty of cooling in space is a matter of physics.

that you'd figure people would learn by now to make arguments based on cost effectiveness. Yet here you are, no mention of cost effectiveness anywhere.

SpaceX's cost effectiveness is largely through reusability. Again, an engineering based solution. If and when we engineer AI processors that do not generate much heat, they will be easier to build and locate on earth. AI in orbit will largely remain for orbital needs, not ground based needs.

Comment Re:More about local processing and faster response (Score 1) 108

Yeah, but you could just put everything you'd put into a satellite into a small shed and plop that somewhere. There's extemely little to be gained by going into space for such things, particularly considering the effort.

I'd like to emphasize that what we put up there will probably be processing data that is acquired up there. I expect for an application that that does not want the lag of low orbit to ground communications.

Comment Re:Exercised by anything (Score 4, Insightful) 38

Fear and fake boogey men is keeps republicans in power. Immigrants will take your jobs at at second. A home invasion will happen to you any second. Biden will ban your steaks, Kamala will force windmills in your backyard, etc etc. Vote republican to hurt others and feel safe!

Slashdot Top Deals

Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration. -- Thomas Alva Edison

Working...