Sam Altman should be taking lessons from Sam Bankman-Fried on how to smuggle contraband in the anal cavity instead of shitposting on /.

I can see this being forced at work, to monitor office attendance.

Also don't insert them into your anus. I think California needs to add another warning.

Are you sure? Is it reasonable to assume when it is just skin contact? Unlike food, most people don't insert headphones in any cavities that have mucous membrane.

Stop pretending that you are actually capable of doing anything else. You can't articulate what you believe, less properly justify it. So you pound the table and yell like hell.

You, just like Ketanji Brown Jackson, cannot even define your terms. This is because your arguments depend on equivocation, the moment I force you to define your terms is the moment it becomes obvious that you are talking nonsense.

Ketanji Brown Jackson failed to define what is a woman - an adult human female - because doing so undermines a core misdirection at the root of trans ideology, that a human male can transition and become a human female (and vice versa). Maybe in the future we will have technology to do that, but in 2026 the best you can do is get part way there, well short of the goal. This shortcoming does not mean that everyone has to agree on redefining all our social norms.

Trying to pretend that issue is settled is blatant gaslighting. There is absolutely no consensus and the radical left is trying to force it closed on their terms. Sex is biological, binary, and has significant physiological differences, you can't pretend that it is the same thing as your self-identity and act as if you can become the opposite sex.

I wish what you observed was limited to only OP's posting. However, it is clear to me that there are fewer actual people involved than personalities. I have a hard time believing there are many people in tech that are THAT rabidly partisan. The shared cultural roots of being a nerd, work that constantly exposes you to ego-checking "it just doesn't work" situations, necessity of continuous self-education to stay current in a rapidly evolved field, etc., etc. enables and causes a degree of pragmatism. Which is completely absent in that poster.

I guess they also work with various slop.

You continuing to argue schematic when you clearly in the wrong administrates your compulsive need to be right about everything. While posting as AC. Did anyone ever tell you it is OK to be wrong?

Was it tails "racism", heads "transphobe" when you were deciding how to try to smear?

Canada's goal should be not to win, that is impossible, but to be forgotten by Trump. Repeatedly antagonizing him is not a winning strategy.

Because there is a high chance she is going to rule on some law according to her definition of what is a woman. "Everyone knows" is not a workable definition when SCOTUS reviewing a case when someone claims gender-based discrimination. The fact that you are not getting this and had to ask a question shows how far left your views drifted.

This will lead to CUSMA expiring, which Trump will be all too happy to blame on Canada. Don't turn Elbows Up into a suicide pact.