Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:BlueSky is for radicals (Score -1, Flamebait) 67

They could have a) attempted to contact him b) check his twitter where he posted about his plans to create Bluesky account. ZERO effort was spent to verify prior to ban, because this ban was about what he posted (questioning trans orthodoxy). The only reason they unbanned is because this went viral and resulted in tons of bad publicity, any regular user would still be banned.

Comment BlueSky is for radicals (Score -1, Flamebait) 67

"To that end, I found Justice [Clarence] Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating," Vance wrote, including a screenshot of the conservative justice's statement agreeing with the 6-3 ruling.

Posting this got JD banned from Bluesky. After something like that, you can't pretend that it wants any conservative or moderate posters.

Submission + - Why Your Car's Touchscreen Is More Dangerous Than Your Phone (carsandhorsepower.com) 1

schwit1 writes: Modern vehicles have quietly become rolling monuments to terrible user experience, trading intuitive physical controls for flashy but dangerous touchscreen interfaces. What began as a luxury feature in early Tesla models has metastasized into an industry-wide plague of poorly designed digital dashboards that demand more attention from drivers than the road itself.

The consequences are measurable and severe: studies now show touchscreen vehicles require up to four times longer to perform basic functions than their button-equipped counterparts, creating a distracted driving crisis that automakers refuse to acknowledge.

Aftermarket solutions can restore functionality. Companies like Analog Automotive are developing physical control panels that interface with popular infotainment systems, bringing back tactile operation.

Voice commands, when properly implemented, offer a safer alternative. GM's latest systems allow natural language requests like "make it warmer" or "defrost the windshield" without menu diving.

Ultimately, the solution requires consumer pushback against dangerous interface trends. Until buyers reject vehicles that prioritize form over function, automakers will continue sacrificing safety at the altar of minimalist design and cost cutting. The road deserves our full attention, not divided focus between driving and debugging a poorly designed tablet on wheels.

Comment Lack of alignment (Score 1) 64

I think we are fortunate that it takes more than added complexity to arrive to AGI, because what we are seeing right now is complete misalignment. Had these AI entities were capable of reasoning and motivation, we as humanity would be toasted.

SF covered this topic - it is likely we will have to raise, as in human child mentoring in a family-like structure, AGIs in human-like way to get them aligned.

Comment Re:Nonsense (Score 3, Insightful) 148

Humanity and many other species are absolutely fucked.

Stop hyperventilating. Higher (and lower) temperatures were observed in both geological record and during human history. Greenland had forests, Sahara was green. If something going to wipe humanity, it is probably going to be nukes or engineered virus, not climate warming.

Comment There is no way to limit warming (Score 0) 148

Our planet is in a warming cycle, there won't be any pole ice in 50 to 100 years. This is inevitable regardless of what humanity does, save some extreme geoengineering. This is OK and happened many times in our planet history. Enjoy Global Greening and stop worrying about Milankovitch cycles.

Slashdot Top Deals

Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

Working...