Thank you. How about a MASM64 for Windows, Linux and macOS?

How do they non-consensually integrate Steam or Battle.net?

Interesting. Thank you.

LOL. A trans-ukrainian pipeline, NordStream 1, and NordStream 2 were all planned and designed and created for a reason. And that was that reality did not match German politics.

LMFAO. Why am I not surprised.

LOL. A trans-ukrainian pipeline, NordStream 1, and NordStream 2 were all planned and designed and created for a reason. And that was that reality did not match German politics.

It happened. Are you claiming it was unplanned?

Except for the parts where they need a trans-ukrainian pipeline, NordStream 1, and NordStream 2.

Which is my point, that the failing was one of operations management. That there were additional problems does not undermine this glaring evidence of bad planning. Bad planning in general is perhaps the reason that the US Coal industry has released more radiation into the environment that the US Nuclear industry.

Take it up with the US Department of Energy. They are the one who I quoted.

LOL. That explains a lot. You take Greta's word. I'll stick with the DOE's.

You are conflating theory with reality, In reality, Germany ditched nuclear for Russian natural gas. When that didn't work they were forced to use more coal. So the remove of nuclear led to increased natural gas, then to increased coal.

Now when people talk about increasing nuclear, do they refer to replacing renewables or do refer to removing coal, oil, and natural gas? You know it's the latter.

Renewables are not threatened by nuclear; coal, oil, and natural gas are threatened.

Sorry, but you are conflating what was not built for political reasons and what "does not work". Various research reactors were shutdown as rewards to greens for political support, their designs not pursued much farther as a result.

However reality is:
"Spent nuclear fuel can be recycled to make new fuel and byproducts. More than 90% of its potential energy still remains in the fuel, even after fiveyears of operation in a reactor. The United States does not currently recycle spent nuclear fuel but foreign countries, such as France, do. There are also someadvanced reactor designs in development that could consume or run on spent nuclear fuel in the future."
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.energy.gov%2Fne%2Farti...

If they can find the little plastic eating critter that produces an opiate the Pacific garbage patch problem will probably be solved pretty quickly.

The plastic is coming from the metal caps you are asking for. The interior of the metal caps are plastic lined. Maybe they can return to a cork liner?

Really. ARM based Debian on an M4 Mini seems pretty much identical to my Intel based Debian running directly on a NUC. Except faster.

"Yes, Debian virtual machines in Parallels Desktop can utilize hardware acceleration, specifically through Parallels' Virtio GPU implementation."
[Google]

Would it run faster if native, sure. Would one notice a difference, probably not. Don't project Asahi Linux problems onto Parallels. Parallels is willing to sign an NDA with Apple and get access to documentation and code that Asahi can not access.

Networking, never noticed any problem. Peripherals, plug something in, macOS asks if you want it to be available to macOS or Linux.

You are mistaken, Debian, and I presume other distros, run very well. And for a college student's needs, probably doubly so.

My experience is that you can pretty much take the Linux docs for software. Replace "apt install" the homebrew equivalents, and continue with the Mac build and install using the remaining Linux instructions as is. I've done this with various toolchains, embedded toolchains for example. CMake, OpenCV, ... Assuming it's not a larger project where you can just install the pre-built Mac binary.

Damn ... can we get the Coca Cola bottled in Mexico with cork lined caps?

The religious zealots would if they could. They are on a crusade.

Absolutely false. A software package called Parallels let you run Windows and Linux on a Mac. Linux runs wonderfully under Parallels, on the Mac desktop. so you get all your "techie" stuff and the commercial office productivity stuff.

What they are not telling you is they are trying to hack their Macs to run Linux directly on the hardware rather than run Linux under macOS. The latter is Apple approved and Apple supported. Hacking the Mac to remove macOS is not Apple supported. But some Linux folks are political, religious actually, and insist running on the hardware is the only way to go. Its not. Run under macOS and you get the best of BOTH worlds. That said, some of those wanting to run Linux directly on the hardware are doing it for the technical challenge. Apple's ARM based CPUs are an incredible improvement over Intel and AMD CPUs. It's natural to want to work directly with such hardware. However for a user, a college student, totally unnecessary. Parallels is the way to go for a student.

No it's not. The ARM-based Macs are not PC compatible hardware, like the older Intel-based Macs. What is missing is documentation on how the hardware works. Some of this hardware is proprietary and the Linux developers working on porting Linux directly to ARM-based Macs will not sign non-disclosure agreements that would allow access to the necessary documentation. Nor will they protect Apple proprietary information, as Microsoft did on Intel Macs.

Most software running on Linux is not Linux specific. Most is portable to any unix-like platform, and that includes the Mac. Install the necessary "unix" libraries using HomeBrew and pretty much any "Linux" app or utility or toolchain can be built on the Mac. Assuming the developer doesn't already provide a pre-built macOS binary on their website. You'll find most FOSS software already offers Mac binaries. In short, a lot of that "techie" software has a Mac download right next to the Linux download on their website.