The promise of "new space" startups like SpaceX is, that they will somehow be able to reduce the costs of bringing up something into space by multiple orders of magnitude.
With respect to AI processing in space its more about local processing, local decision making, faster response times. It for much more focused and limited work. Not the high volume general purpose work a ground based data center would perform.
You know what the best thing about this topic is? Everybody who comments on it thinks they're an expert.
Or maybe it only requires a junior high school level of science, understanding heat conduction and that space offers little of that. That a ground based data center that effectively needs a river for cooling and a space based AI platform being different as a result.
for space... then we have zero problem using them here on earth. Space is cold but is also a vacuum so you lose all of your ability to convectively cool and are reliant on radiative cooling alone.
I expect the AI work done in orbit will be much more specialized. Smaller scale and less cooling demands.
There is radiative cooling in the sense of IR emissions. It more a lack of conduction, heat transfer through physical contact.
LOL, the commissar continues to try to move the goalposts,
Exactly, that is what you do.
... to spew vitriol, labels and empty accusations, like a true communist would.
Exactly, that is what you do.
What's missing from that little speech? Exactly, evidence for their claims.
Other than the posts above that show the true origin of the conversation, a bit different than you claimed.
abulafia says he would not install the LLM, Apple would regardless of the type of user 'harden' the OS.
No, it seems that Apple is requiring the user to explicitly allow agents to have access. For example the new version of Xcode has the ability to be controlled by an AI agent. First time I ran the new version it asked if I wanted to allow agents to use Xcode. The options were always, only when Xcode is already running, never.
This looks like the final cell-phonification of the Mac. I'm bummed.
Don't worry, it's not. MacOS already requires that a user give explicit permission to an app that wants full disk access. It kind of sounds like Apple is going to have greater granularity than the current options of your app's writable folder and everything.
Just like a commissar of the communist party, the moron is toeing the line. Without evidence or understanding, but with fervor. trumpism at its purest.
What an amazing bit of projection you have there.
And yet another bad guess on your part regarding Trump. Hint: Being critical of the CCP is a quite bipartisan endeavor.
That would affect the buyer's rights with respect to the seller, not not his rights with respect to the gaming company.
That is surely what the other lawyer would offer as a counterargument. I would also expect that there is something about hardware based bans in the terms of service, which the buyer would have to agree to in order to access the online game.
Skydance is the company name, the brands are remaining the same.
Sydance is one of those pre-existing brands. "Skydance Productions was an American media production and financing company"
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
I wonder whether this is legal.
Sold "as is" could conceivably be interpreted as banned from a game due to prior abuse. Its plausible a lawyer could successfully argue this.
The CPUID instruction gives a lot of information (including serial number)
Not since the Intel Pentium 4, presumably AMD also stopped returning a unique value long ago.
CPUID doesn't give you any serialnumber or other unique id.
They briefly did in the Pentium 3 era, the confusion lingers as the functionality exists in CPUID but it no longer returns an actual unique value.
Your code should be more efficient!
