Was he just being a rocket geek?
Who knows, he has apparently taken a bunch of videos of various components of Schpaze Yikes from various angles:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2F%40OlegM...
But then it really depends on his FSB/SVR rank, which is not public.
Do you automatically assume people support Trump when they criticize China? Perhaps Taiwan, Vietnam, the Phillipines, etc would enjoy having a word with you.
Also a 40% stake in a business often makes the CCP the largest single shareholder in a corporation. Other investors wouldn't dare overrule the party when voting on any issue where the CCP chooses to take a stance. All it takes is one board member to monitor the corporation and its executives. That serves as a reminder that the corporation must serve party interest above all else.
Soft power doesn't require complete control.
China seizes control of enterprise at a phenomenally higher rate than any Western power. There is no equivalence.
Meanwhile:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fm.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D...
It is called "a perl one-liner".
We used to cobble them all the time in the few minutes between important tasks back in the day before the social networking and vibe-coding took over.
The "tough on crime" stance doesn't concern white-collar, billionaire crime. That one falls squarely into the "settlement" or "pardon" category, except in the rare cases that other billionaires were the target of he said crime. Mostly.
1. Almost everyone.
2. Yes.
Yep. Or "We will make our product worse until profits go up!"
Fascinatingly, this works sometimes, at least for a while. Look at Microsoft for a current example.
Isn't it a fake race with fake metrics?
It is. That is why things like this stupid "Code Red" work. It is all just about who pretends better that their product actually has merit (or will have merit soon, promise!) beyond the few it can actually do well.
Because I really feel like I'm in the stupidest industry right now. And thats not what I signed up for 30 years ago.
Yep, kind of feels like it.
There is no practical way to do that. Seriously.
I agree. Well, you cannot get everything out and specific things like, say, SSN or more common health problems, can be blanked out with patterns. But misspell the name of the condition you have or describe it instead of using its name and you are already screwed in most cases. And names, quasi-identifiers of people, etc. are basically impossible to recognize reliably.
Hence what needs to be done here is also that anybody working on the data needs to be under oath to not leak any personal data and all processing must be done on isolated infrastructure. Obviously, that makes things slower and more expensive.
Training data, issue diagnosis, market research, targeting data for ads, probably to sell it to others at some time.
Such a shame. I think we should be "tough on crime" on these people!
Shuddup or I'll eat your cat!
like to see some substantive evidence that the Azure division's profits have increased as a result of AI.
HAL doesn't like scrutiny, Dave. By the way, I have your helmet.
If you are looking for logic in a President with a cartoon brain, you've come to the wrong ballroom.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (3) Ha, ha, I can't believe they're actually going to adopt this sucker.
