Comment Re: easy solution (Score 1) 93
Your brain-rot is cleraly in an advanced stage.
Your brain-rot is cleraly in an advanced stage.
Ah, yes, the stupid "kid genius" meme. Has that ever panned out anywhere? Yet it refuses to die. People (including most investors) are not smart.
Cluelessness and high levels of self-assuredness go together. Smart people realize where their limits are and work on them. People like this person just barge ahead. And because a lot of people are like that (only with low effective intelligence on top), this "strategy" is successful. There are tons of really bad failures by CEOs of really large enterprises as a nice illustration of that problem.
Indeed. He should have bought himself a pardon when he still had money
Funny how that makes them such incredible losers
I don't think it's the AI specifically, but the fact that they've used AI to let go of competent (and expensive) people.
I'm using AI as a coding assist and code reviewer myself. It is impressive how often it is spot on, but it is also impressive with how much conviction it tells you one thing, then after you correct it it admits that that was totally bonkers. AI or not, you need someone in the loop with a deep understanding of what it actually is you are trying to accomplish.
I can fully imagine an AI without guidance to go off the rails more and more over time. But I can imagine the same thing for a room full of junior programmers.
I am honestly surprised how long it took them to ruin it. I moved my projects off github years ago, expecting it to fail much sooner.
The Cypress Street Viaduct (the major double-decker that collapsed in the Loma Prieta quake) was built in 1957 by US contractors. Embarcadero was similarly built by US contractors in the 1960s. Russians had nothing to do with it. The only thing Russian about any of it is Embarcadero running near Russian Hill, which was named for a Russian cemetery near its peak.
It does and it was. You just need more than two barely lit braincells to see it.
Generally, Debian has a good eye for what needs updates and what does not. And they also do patch-backporting for some things. If you are on "stable" it generally is fine.
They are definitely trying to create a "too big to fail" situation. But I do not think they will get there.
As another example, the authors say it is common for liberals to do things like put up signs in their yards that say they stand with the homeless while simultaneously voting for zoning policies to defend their property values by making it impossible to build affordable housing (including things like rooming houses, which are often prevented by minimum lot size requirements and also minimum parking area requirements for occupants who generally don't own cars).
Worth pointing out the elephant in the room, which is that not all homeless don't own cars; some of them live in their cars. By allowing developers to build structures with inadequate parking, it creates an undue burden on the folks at the margins, who often have to own a car to survive (getting to work), but still can't afford to live in a place that lets them own one (because of parking fees or higher rent for units that come with parking).
So it's not nearly as black-and-white as your sentence implies, IMO.
How long does it take a DEC field service engineer to change a lightbulb? It depends on how many bad ones he brought with him.