Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment But fluoride and vaccines are optional. (Score 1) 245

It's useful to be able to read cursive the same way it's useful to be able to read an analog clock. But unless you expect people to return to taking notes with pen and paper, there's no meaningful advantage to being able to write in a script that's only marginally faster than ordinary discontinuous writing can be. It's not like there's a doubling or tripling of transcription speed -- for that, you need shorthand or typing. I would much rather see children learn to type than learn to write in cursive.

Comment Re: Scan your receipt to leave (Score 1) 195

Do you know the way to leave Safeway?
I've been inside so long,
I may go wrong and pass away.
You can't really leave from this Safeway.
I hope that I will find
Some peace of mind outside Safeway.

Lower prices are the magnet,
They can lure you far away from home.
With a drink in your hand you're never alone.
Hours turn into days, how quick they pass.
And all the thieves that never were
Are noshing grapes and passing gas.

Comment Upscaling. (Score 1) 141

The more raw pixels your display device has, the better you can upscale lower resolution video onto it. For example, if I watch 720p video on a 1080p display, it has to do a 3:2 upscaling and that means that half the scan lines fall in the cracks and cannot be represented adequately. If I'm using a 2160p display, that's a 3:1 upscaling and every third line can correspond to exactly what was fed in. Thin lines won't disappear, and text will remain legible no matter what size it was in the original image. I could also use Nearest Neighbor scaling and get every pixel replicated 9 times over, but it would remain faithful. Similarly, if I feed in a 480p signal from a retro game rig, higher resolution at the screen level means I have more options on how to best emulate a CRT without having to worry about pixel boundaries on the output end.

I want an 8K display in the range of 50 inches so that I have the choice of sitting two feet away and using it as a monitor, or sitting across the room where I admittedly won't care if it's upscaling 1080p video. I don't want to have to own two separate devices to do these jobs, even if the resolution is overkill much of the time. Right now, I use a 27 inch 4K display as my primary monitor but there are times when I really could use two or even four of them. Do I need an 8K TV? No, I realistically don't even need a 4K TV. 1080p is fine there. But that's not the only thing I would want to use a large display for. I don't have room for a dedicated movie watching screen if I've got a 55 inch monitor mounted to a wall, the one device has to do double duty and that means sometimes it's going to be severe overkill for the purpose.

Comment Re:But the real question on everyone's mind... (Score 3, Funny) 30

You just know it will get called the latter, just like Capital One (Cap It Alone), Experts Exchange (put the space before the "s"), Parts Express (same), and Pen Island (do I really have to spell this one out?). In this case (and I suspect in Pen Island's case) this is not by accident. The name was chosen because it can be corrupted in a humorous way.

Submission + - Civitai Blocking Access to the United Kingdom

Shakes Fist writes: Thanks to the Online Safety Act, the UK is blocking access to one of the world's largest AI resources. The government that wants the UK to be a software powerhouse. Labour didn't introduce this but they didn't oppose it.

I quote:

"Civitai Blocking Access to the United Kingdom
---------------------------------------------

As of 11:59pm UTC on the 24th July 2025, users located in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland will no longer be able to access Civitai.

We know this is deeply disappointing news, and we're tremendously sorry to our UK community. You've been an important and valued part of our platform since inception, and we're heartbroken to have to take such a drastic step. This decision wasn't taken lightly, and we want to be transparent about why it's necessary.

### The Online Safety Act (OSA) Is a Serious Compliance Burden

The UK government has enacted the Online Safety Act (OSA), a sweeping new law that governs any online service accessible to UK users — even those hosted abroad. If your platform allows user-generated content (as ours does), you're required to comply.

This law is not limited to big tech. It explicitly applies to platforms of all sizes, including small companies like ours. It doesn’t matter where we're based. The moment a UK user can access our site, we're on the hook.

The law requires:

- Two complex legal risk assessments (on illegal content and children's access)
- Ongoing compliance documentation and auditing
- Age verification systems, requiring intrusive biometric ID checks
- Expanded moderation requirements, and the removal of new categories of content, under the UK's Extreme Pornography legislation.

If that sounds like a lot, it is. The law itself is over 250 pages long, and the regulatory guidance from Ofcom — the UK enforcement agency — is currently over 3,000 pages. It is legalese-laden, cross-referenced, and constantly shifting.

We’re a small team. We simply don’t have the legal budget or manpower to decode and implement this. Attempting to comply without expert legal counsel would be reckless, and if we get it wrong...

### The Penalties Are Real — And Personal

Non-compliance with the OSA is no joke. Ofcom has the power to levy fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue, whichever is greater.

These fines aren't a threat; they're being applied to platforms now. In March, after the first requirements of the Bill came into effect, Ofcom fined OnlyFans £1.05 million for failing to adequately explain their age-assurance measures.

More chillingly, company directors and designated managers can face personal criminal liability if Ofcom determines we failed in our child safety or moderation duties. The law empowers Ofcom to act without warning: their first contact with a platform can be a formal breach notice with enforcement action attached. We cannot risk this level of liability.

### Can't We Just Fly Under the Radar?

Unfortunately, no. We're already on it. We've had multiple meetings with the UK Home Office to defend the legitimacy of our AI-generated content and protect creative freedom. We’re not an unknown startup. Civitai is known to UK regulators, and pretending we can remain invisible simply isn't realistic.

### Why Not Just Comply?

We wish we could. But the truth is, this law was written with massive tech firms in mind, not modest teams like ours. It requires constant legal review, multi-layered moderation systems beyond those we have in place now, and deep regulatory expertise. To do this responsibly and effectively would require hundreds of hours and tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees. It's not just a few policies — these sorts of obligations require a full-time legal team, and expanded moderation team which we can't afford.

### What Happens Next

At the deadline, UK users will begin seeing a block message when visiting Civitai from within the blocked territories.

### To Our UK Community

We're truly sorry. This situation is deeply frustrating, and a geoblock was our last possible option. We care about this space, and we care about our users.

We hope the regulatory climate changes in the future, and if and when it does, we’ll reassess our ability to reopen access to the UK. That said, if recent legislation is any indication — such as proposals to further restrict even consensual adult content — we worry that the trend may be moving in the opposite direction."

An online petition to question this was started https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpetition.parliament.uk... which has gained over 17'000 signatures. The Government responds to all petitions that get more than 10,000 signatures.

Comment Re: 40x income is still 40x paid to gov't (Score 1) 191

It did come apart into three pieces, which could be seen but the seams were made fairly tolerable. From that I'd gather it was hollow with some sort of framework inside and a skin, not a solid chunk of bronze. Moving it would be a project, but not a "had to take out a wall" kind of project like moving a newspaper printing operation.

Comment Sounds right. (Score 1) 1

That would explain why the Magyar Birds are racking up around 10% of enemy soldiers killed. This does need to be handled with some caution so that the metric doesn't become the purpose, and new operators still get something because it's not their fault they don't have a history or rank or Elo or whatever they're using. Also you don't want to incentivize tactics that might get the operators located and shelled, which might not be detected and exploited immediately but like a pitcher tipping his pitches, someone is eventually going to notice.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I prefer rogues to imbeciles, because they sometimes take a rest." -- Alexandre Dumas (fils)

Working...