Anthropic Rolls Out Claude AI For Financial Services 21
Anthropic has launched a specialized version of its Claude AI tools for the financial services sector, designed to assist professionals with investment decisions, market analysis, and research. The Financial Analysis Solution "includes Claude 4 models, Claude Code and Claude for Enterprise with expanded usage limits, implementation support and other features," reports CNBC. From the report: As part of its new Financial Analysis Solution, Claude will get real-time access to financial information through data providers like Box, PitchBook, Databricks, S&P Global and Snowflake. Anthropic said many of these integrations are available on Tuesday, with more to come. Anthropic's Financial Analysis Solution and Claude for Enterprise are available on AWS Marketplace. The company said Google Cloud Marketplace availability is coming soon. "What this is is a tailored version of Claude for Enterprise," Kate Jensen, Anthropic's head of revenue said at an event in New York City on Tuesday. "It's specifically built for financial analysts, and it's equipped for the nuance, accuracy and reasoning that you need to handle the complexity of your work."
I wonder what the EULA says (Score:5, Funny)
Starting the countdown timer on "but nobody could possibly have known"
Re: I wonder what the EULA says (Score:2)
Clowne (Score:2)
financial analyst (Score:2)
This will eventually filter down to all stock traders, including the retail business. I was talking about this with my financial advisor, some day pretty soon his job will be replaced by AI and he agreed.
Re: (Score:3)
And when it - and you know it will - starts offering for sale stocks that don't exist, and other AIs buy them? Who goes to prison?
Re: (Score:2)
And when it - and you know it will - starts offering for sale stocks that don't exist, and other AIs buy them? Who goes to prison?
Probably the same lawmakers who go to prison for Insider Tradi, oh that’s right. I almost forgot. That’s not illegal anymore. It’s now a job perk.
(Just in case you forgot who hollowed out your question completely. The Stock “Market” trades in delusion now. Don’t need sense to make cents, until the inevitable crash no one and yet everyone sees coming.)
Re: financial analyst (Score:2)
We have had computers doing high frequency trading for a long time. It has not eliminated all professional traders yet. Why do you think AI trading would be any different?
Re: (Score:1)
Automated algo etc errors are very different from AI hallucinations and even more from mass impact of AI Hallucination & AI Slop (fyi, those words have specific meanings wrt how LLM type AI problems come up)
Not that I wouldn't use this, just know & regulate the risk
Re: (Score:2)
Most research shows that buy & hold for investments over the long run is typically most efficient - lower transaction costs, tax costs, bid / ask spreads, etc. Humans, by and large, have not been successful in timing the market. I follow the Bogleheads philosophy. Which can be roughly summarized as "you get what you don't pay for". ie. don't pay for high expense ratios for managers - but low ER for index funds. I doubt that AI can really predict market movements, either over short or long-term. And you
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You may be correct that a lot of gains are made on FOMC meeting days. And perhaps losses too, conversely, when the market doesn't like with the fed has to say. But you can't really predict what they will say. Trying to time the fed is a fool's errand. It's speculation. And you have to be right twice - when you sell, and when you buy back. I have tried it and wish I never placed a single trade. I would probably have a 2-3 millions more to my name. They would come in handy now that I'm disabled. But at least
Real money is on the front side (Score:2)
Re: Real money is on the front side (Score:3)
Right. But you could buy non dividend paying stock or fund, say, BRK, let it grow to $28M, and due to step up basis, they would never pay a cent in federal estate taxes. And many states don't either.
If you never sold a share, you would never have paid one cent of tax on capital gains, or on dividends, since the stock is non dividend paying.
Beyond $28M you would have taxes due. Unless you start dealing with things like trusts.
I don't have $28M or kids, so haven't researched the details, but I'm sure there a
Re: Real money is on the front side (Score:1)
It helps a ton if you link an article or something else to reference for a discussion.
I'm not seeing anything about this on my initial searches, so I can't even verify if it exists. It did lead me to the "Trump Accounts" which in my opinion is a good way to get in the habit of saving.
Do you see how your can create an insightful decision if you try to back up what you're saying instead of forcing everyone to do the leg work?
Re: Real money is on the front side (Score:2)
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2025%2F07%2F08%2Fhow-trump-accounts-work.html
Looks like slashdot dropped my link. I wish the mobile experience at least had preview. Anyway, sorry for making myself look like an idiot
Re: Real money is on the front side (Score:2)
Had to Google the Trump accounts. Great if you have children. Not so great otherwise. I doubt the small incentives will be enough to raise the current 1.7 children per woman anywhere close to the 2.1 replacement rate.
Limiting abortions through the UCSV, and increasing unwanted pregnancies can only do so much.
Without immigration, America would be demographically screwed in the long run, as many aging countries now are, such as Japan, Korea, even China, now are.
Better to provide a good safety net, including h
Re: (Score:2)
The la Presidenta accounts do exactly as they are intended. They were never meant raise the productivity of American women. They exist soley so la Presidenta can honk on about them ad absurdum. The "productivity" is just the cover story. He isn't hard to figure out.
And we move one step closer to disaster. (Score:2)
everyone's selling that next (Score:2)
"What this is is a tailored version of Claude for Enterprise"
This is what all the big AI companies are banking on next.
Microsoft and OpenAI are selling "Copilot X" as "the future of enterprise AI". Copilot etc agents are limited by their context token cache size to ingest enterprise data + tokenize prompts + provide contextual answers.
I'm not sure how they're ingesting private enterprise data technically. Are we training an instance of the Claude model on our enterprise data and running the training and inf