Comment Re: Agreed (Score 1) 20
So you're a. Chernobyl expert. Must come with being MAGA.
So you're a. Chernobyl expert. Must come with being MAGA.
"...kind of figure out how to dole out the benefits..."
This is all anyone needs to know about Sam Altman. He is a sociopath.
When he says accept some bad things so we can dole out benefits, he means he should be rich and you should suffer. An AI that cannot provide any alleged benefit without doing damage should NOT be deployed and anyone who does so should be imprisoned.
Yawn, yet another commissarism, even when not able to present evidence or make any comment on substance, the moron doesn't give up.
They truly believe they will win by persistence and escalation, the morons.
The fact that 659,880 vehicles were stolen last year doesn't automatically lead to a suspension of personal privacy and the granting of authority to police officers beyond what they appear to be able to responsibly wield. I don't accept hand waving past the lack of oversight, transparency, and consequences to those who abuse their authority in the hopes that some meaningful portion of the 659,880 vehicle thefts are closed or reduced in future years.
It was 850,708 in 2024. That 23% drop had little to do with Flock, and is mainly the Kia/Hyundai software fixes, post-pandemic crime continuing to trending down, and focused programs in some communities around reminding people to lock their vehicles, hide valuables, etc. (you may have seen these signs in your area or the PSAs). Supporters of Flock and other camera systems tends to claim around a 10% decrease in crime for local communities that install their cameras, while the above shows that some thefts are dropping beyond that percentage regardless if cameras were installed.
"Mix one programming language into another whole language", we are talking about CPython here, not the Python language.
I did some checking, and AI tells me CPython is "a program written largely in C that reads, compiles, and executes Python code". It "converts Python source into Python bytecode, then runs that bytecode inside CPython’s virtual machine". On most Linux systems it is the python3 executable, the program that compiles/interprets your Python code and runs it. So converting some or all of that into Rust seems like a natural step that would be invisible to most users.
Note that this is different from Cython, which can compile a Python module into C language and use that to generate an assembly language version of your module that can run much faster than native Python.
Let's not put tools into the hands of people who abuse them. At least not without more significant safeguards and better transparency than we have today.
I saw part of the testimony. This all comes down to human over-aggressivenessâ"not even mistakes.
The detective used Flock to look for all Dodge Durangos within a radius of the accident. They located her at her apartment. So far, so good. But her car is a different color than what eyewitnesses said. Other details did not match up with eyewitness accounts. There was NO damage to her vehicle, but they arrested her anyway. The detective doubled down and the police continued there prosecution of her.
I'm no fan of Flock, but in this case it's simply bad police.
And the same detective could've queried the DMV and asked for all Dodge Durango vehicles registered in the state. They have that access by default. Sure, they would get a lot of hits, but then they could narrow it down, by partial plate, color, age, etc.
And likely she never would've even been a suspect.
No, Flock may not be completely guilty, but it's not innocent either because just passing by should never be a reason to be arrested. The only way for Flock to win is if its camera captured the accident because it happened to be right in front of it.
It's poor policing, but it's Flock-enabled poor policing.
Flock being misused or abused; a botched execution in Tennessee; Trump continuing to block CNN despite a court order... you might almost think there's something wrong with the American legal system.
How much will my subscription increase?
You're thinking about it wrong. Think of all the new content you'll have available that you won't want to watch! Isn't that worth paying two, maybe three times as much?
Shinyhunters is an AI masquerading as a teen. Do you want to change your answer?
As "a teen"? The funny thing about stupid people (such as yourself) is that when you post bullshit it is so easily verifiable as such. Even if it was AI, there have already been multiple members of ShinyHunters arrested around the world, some of which admitted to being members of the group, and who thus far have not been teens.
I do want to change my answer:
Before: Fuck all the way off with your crime excusing bullshit.
After: Fuck all the way off with your crime excusing bullshit and be less of a retard.
Which brings me to my point: Python should be frozen as is. No more development. Tinkering with it just because some people want to contribute and get visibility in open source is not a good cost/benefit outcome for humanity.
Because that worked well for Perl right? Nothing like stagnation to secure the firmament.
Very handy when you try to shelter in place after a nuclear strike
Because the EMP will go around an AM radio while taking out FM ones?
You are arguing on the level of "you are holding it wrong". Pathetic and marks you as not very smart. Which, incidentally, makes you the primary LLM target group.
To do two things at once is to do neither. -- Publilius Syrus