Builders in America don't understand what the dead-latch is for and over-size the strike plate to save time. If the dead-latch is able to fall through the strike plate, the lock can be opened with a shim. 2/3rds of the reason for the deadbolt on top of the locking latch is widespread installation error of latching locks.
Step two is a GM app store
Step three is subscriptions for all the apps in your car. Cruise control? There's an app for that. Aircon? App for that too.
Buy a second hand car? You'll need to pay for all the options the original buyer already paid for.
They're not forced to move to Microsoft 365 as I'm guessing that they won't have deployed Office Online Server anyway, they will have the native desktop apps installed instead.
Sirius paid good money to have their software preinstalled. How are customers have the ability to remove it
Audi: We don't test third party software before updating your car, and the apps can crash the OS. Das Auto.
The link doesn't need encryption if the application layer is encrypted.
Relying on link encryption is an illusion. As soon as the packets hit the internet, it's open.
If you're not confused about what company they're talking about, then what's the problem?
I remember the days when people were talking about Compu$erve.
The problem is that I want a full and intelligent discussion that can stand on its own merits without resorting to name-calling. If you have a valid argument (and there are plenty of valid arguments against TPM) then It's just not necessary to get the point across.
It's hard to take someone seriously when they can't even use the proper terms for things they are talking about.
Sure, you may not like what a TPM is and what it does, but to call it a "Treacherous Platform Module" instead of a "Trusted Platform Model" shows me that you need to resort to name calling just to try and get your point across. Similarly for people who refer to "Micro$oft" or "Winblows", look, I get your point, but you're talking about technical things where correctness matters. At least use the proper name for something and then tell me in a clear and concise fashion exactly why it's no good.
iOS is not BSD.
iOS is the Mach microkernel with FreeBSD APIs and mostly FreeBSD userspace binaries.
iOS is a Unix-like operating system, based on macOS.
macOS is an honest-to-goodness Unix.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.opengroup.org%2Fopen...
so they did not implement DANE or RPKI
if you delegate you have a serious problem
irony is they use route53 so its a single click solution they just did. not,,,,
silly get on it
also no HSTS and one of your mail servers does not offer STARTTLS (they use google but not the secure DNSSEC settings) and the domain does not have CAA.
faarrk did no one raise this with them ? seems unlikely.... seems like bonus got in the way of security
JJ
Police radio? CB radio?
If you don't want data to be read. encrypt it. Don't rely on the links to protect you. As soon as your WiFi data gets to the AP, it's no longer encrypted.
There's no such thing as a free lunch. -- Milton Friendman
