The key here is that it helps, but it can't replace you. Not that I care whether you get replaced, but there are a couple trillion bubble bux riding on whether you can be replaced, so it's a big deal.
I love seeing you guys squirm and post some non responsive nonsense because you can't actually address a single thing someone says.
Tell us your side is completely devoid of thought and serious policies without telling us.
Every single thing he said is true and jammed in our faces daily.
Cry more. JDV 8 years.
Thief cries when robbed.
I feel no pity.
They long ago forgot "do no evil".
Microsoft got talked into...
If OpenAI were to implode...
These are only yet more things that are Microsoft's fault.
False advertising is not the solution.
Did OpenAI do the false advertising? If not, then they're not to blame.
I've been reading a lot about this and for the last 20 years largely the agw global warming advocates have INSISTED that food crops wouldn't flourish in higher CO2 environs (despite obvious logical and ample evidence - cf greenhouses commonly run at higher co2 concentrations for just this reason).
www.purdue.edu/newsroom/archive/releases/2017/Q1/rising-co2-due-to-climate-change-may-not-improve-agriculture,-model-shows.html
Rising CO2 due to climate change may not improve agriculture, model shows
https://yaleclimateconnections...
"A recent Department of Energy report falsely states that rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere will boost agricultural yields. In fact, climate change is much more likely to make food scarcer and more expensive. "
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedaily.com%2Fr...
"Carbon dioxide could reduce crop yields" Are we conceding that now? "OK yes it will help them grow but they won't be as nutritious" is th new line?
Just want to be sure I'm current where the argument's at.
What's wrong with you?
Nice try to deflect and redirect back on me but this is slashdot. "Oh, you shouldn't take my crazy paranoid shit so literally, you must be dumb" is a wild take at a place where people post far more extreme shit daily, mean it all, and get modded up for it.
If you're being sarcastic or don't mean it you do need to say so but in this case given your post history, I think you did mean it and now try to flip the script when you realized how nutty it looked after getting called out. I may be stupid and I may be an asshole but I'm not a delusional paranoid stupid asshole. I passed basic reading comprehension class in third grade. That's sufficient for a dead site like this where the same crap gets posted every day by the same people and gets modded up by other crazy people.
Tx kbye!
Hey, we're going to have a room set up just for breastfeeding.
Should I put in a webcam connected to the internet?
Of course!
That was some weird ass drug induced crazy af shit!
Where can I get some of that?
But can your guy get me some that doesn't make me wildly paranoid? It's not a good look.
Tx kbye!
I was exactly in the field supporting researching working on software to do layouts. If you worked in the field doing layouts it's near 100% likely you used that software in at least one job.
Little bro got all mad because jacks got called out for making obviously stupid claim that field has existed since the dawn of time and has seen no original work.
Don't be mad, little bro. Be less stupid than me. It's not hard. I'm really stupid, but you still failed the test.
Hey that's a cool story, little bro. PCB layout was created by God on day 8? It's always been here. No one has ever done anything original in that field.
Weird, how yeah, I was in that field for a few years, so it's super weird how I was supporting all these folks doing research in the field. If only they'd talked to you they could've learned it was all a lie. It's always been there. No one has ever done anything original in the field. It's always existed.
I didn't learn a thing from you. I already knew your ego was bigger than your brains and knowledge base. Status quo maintained, little bro.
"everyone that disagrees with me is stupid!"
Maybe assume that reasonable people can look at facts and disagree, and that's normal, with out assuming you have a magically-endowed monopoly on truth or morality?
Just saying.
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Should I continue or are you so mired in "I hate the free market" double-speak that you are beyond reason?
Fwiw, You know the EPA completely lied about ddt?
Geez if we could only go back to living in caves and 40y life span socialist paradise.
.. it technically IS part of the executive branch.
And it's still funded by fees, not congressional appropriations, yes?
And the commissioners nominated by the president, approved by the Senate, yeah?
So nothing changes.
But please: feel free to resume your fetal position if you like.
"A mind is a terrible thing to have leaking out your ears." -- The League of Sadistic Telepaths
