You're a naive fool
Nothing naïve or foolish here at all. This is well informed intention. The intention leads to GULAGs for the likes of you, and your wrong-thinking ways. That's what rsilvergun and all its ilk dream of and strive for, as we see in the UK.
These spying claims are much more dubious.
Dubious spying claims? Say it isn't so!
One wonders about how many thousands of stories there have been right here on slashdot about this or that bit of software, hardware or service supposedly wrecking democracy with its home phoning and data collection. But let the cost be less cut rate grey market hardware for the buying, and all such concerns become "dubious!"
If not for double standards, we'd have no standards at'll.
But now big government is telling you what you can and cannot buy.
Ironic. A little while ago there was a big thread about dieselgate. All sorts of slashsnotters creaming over cases and fines for violations of big government regulations.
Now big government enforcing regulations is unwelcome when it comes to cut rate electronic junk...
Here is my surprised face
Why does it take over a decade to bring this to court?
The correct oxen must be gored, and the correct pockets must be filled with the correct amounts. It takes a long time for The Great and The Good to plan the feast.
Sure. And if the government cretins would forego a lawyer or two and instead hire an actual technician tasked to actually verify the performance of regulated products once or twice a decade, you'd actually have some means of keeping the business cretins under control. But time and time again, whether it's Madoff or dieselgate or Boeing, we find no functioning technicians anywhere in the whole, bloated clown show: just a bunch of lawyers covering asses and gleefully dancing through revolving doors.
Business cretins will be cretins. That is a metaphysical certitude. Even if you throw enough of them in a GULAG to cripple you're economy, the survivors will still be cretins. If you want compliance, the only hope you have is diligent regulators. When (not if) they fail, be sure your government-worship hasn't blinded you to their culpability.
"They" do. The Great Recession debt bubble was immediately proceeded by luminaries such a Barney Frank self-assuredly denying any problems, and characterizing the pesky noticers as misguided.
The AI bubble is end stage. LLMs are essentially next level search engines and, while powerful, their power is finite, especially since the training material is already exhausted. Further, there is little value in redundant implementations: there is no need for a dozen plus distinct tier 1 LLMs all exhibiting approximately the same performance.
So a shakeout is imminent. We will not be carpeting the country with nuclear reactors because Sam Altman. That's actually a shame: if a bunch of reactors were built for the wrong reason, at least we'd have the reactors when it's all over.
This is really well established.
[citation needed]
If there are patterns for those, this helps the attackers.
Now you're engaging in a regression chain: If false positives are high it's useless. And if it's not useless, it helps attackers. And if it doesn't help attackers...
If it is a larger number, then this is still a fail and unusable.
Do you have any rational basis for this claim? If there were 101 reports, and 51 were bogus, the discovery only 50 legitimate flaws in a widely used and mature code base is somehow an unworkable process?
I believe we're witnessing the emergence AIDS. AI derangement syndrome.
Past this BBC groomed narrative, there is plenty of details on your little firebug.
TDS suffering, Biden donating climate change alarmist. Standard issue privileged white boy in CA.
Crybully cop out. Naturally.
and CBS like everybody else was way right of center
So nothing is changing here? Why the Parade of Horribles then?
Perhaps the two walls of text you've written (so far) belies your genuine thoughts on this: a crack has formed in the uniform feed of establishment group-think narrative to the tee-vee watching masses. The wine women limousine liberal voice may have lost a platform. How terrible!
The good news for you is that network tee-vee doesn't mean much any longer. The bad news is you're not doing great on the new platform(s) either.
If they can keep the generated one away from politics
They'll just make AI generated commies.
police officers working from home? and not on the beat?
Of course. And why not? Priority number one is detecting all those interweb wrongthinkers. For that all you need is a laptop: you can "protect" establishment narratives from anywhere in the world.
The failed pseudo-science of psychology is still failed even when it affirms the commie inside of you.
Real Users know your home telephone number.
