Ah, so the republican voters will happily pay additional taxes to service the record debt the orange shitgibbon created? Nice.

I always thought that coding questions during interviews were stupid anyways even before AI: it's information that one can simply look up with a simple internet search or programming book.

If you could learn to code with one simple internet search and having one book on your shelf, then you'd be right. Also, ha it occurred to you that you've been asking the wrong questions?

The only reason to ask programming questions is to figure out if the person was "fibbing" on their resume about their skills.

Kinda. That's the point of an audition. A substantial number of programmers can't write a simple program in a language of their choice or read existing code they're not already familiar with. I know there are companies that hoover up loads of mediocre people and they just kind of grind doing tiny amounts. And I'm pretty sure some people can only code by randomly permuting code in an existing codebase and seeing what happens.

Plus it shows absolutely nothing about their interpersonal skills, which are as important to be a valued member of a development team.

Gosh it's almost lie you can ask two interview questions or even 3! You don't need to ask a single question than answer every topic.

You go to the right schools and you meet the right people and you get to pretty much do whatever you want. And you get into the schools because your parents get you there and their parents got them there.

If the working class had half the solidarity of the Epstein class we would live in a Utopia

It's not a product it's capital. It's not something you sell the people it's something you use to make things.

It's a labor saving device. Automation. In other words a job killer.

There are studies that clearly indicate that factory automation is responsible for approximately 70% of the Lost middle class jobs since the 1980s.

We have been automating away high paying jobs as fast as we can for decades and AI is just another extension of that.

The Epstein class doesn't want to sell you products. They don't want to have you as an employee. They look back at the Kings and emperors of old and say, that should be me. I shouldn't be dependent on consumers and employees.

They are planning a new world and you're not part of it.

And because nobody gets it unless I say it this way, like George Carlin said it's a big club and you ain't in it.

For some reason one Carlin says that everybody understands but when I explain it it's right out the window.

I used EMACS pretty consistently until about 10 years ago (So... 1992 to about 2025 thereabouts) until the repo with all the configs I had got nuked by atlassian. Last time I tried to use Emacs I discovered to my horror I had forgotten almost all the chords I used to know so intuitively.

Emacs was the one text mode IDE that can hold its own with the visual studios, eclipses and jetbrains of the world. Its a *full* IDE. Whereas vim can hold its own handily against the VS-Codes of the world, Emacs is more aligned with the full Vis Studios or Jetbrains IDEAs.

The problem for me is, its just easier to use Jetbrains now. The computers are fast enough to handle that tiny bit of extra load. And going from zero to hero on a new machine is as quick as downloading the ide and starting it.

There will always be a space in my heart for emacs, but I just dont know if I have the patience for it anymore.

But hey, the old girl is the same age as me. I should ask if she's single.

Not that filthy EMACS users are any better. Both should be purged. Nano master race raise up!

Theres an editor I'm somewhat fond of thats replaced Nano for me called, conveniently enough, Micro. Its basically a Nano style no-nonsense basic editor. More for modifying config files than as an IDE, but its got mouse support that just works like its supposed to (Assuming your term config + ssh has mouse setup right, these days thats true mot of the time) , uses wordstar keys (ctrl-c/v/x , ctrl-s to save, ctrl-q to quit etc) and has a nice plugin system and lua scripting for adding in missing features and so on.

"Are AI Execs Too Out of Touch To Build For the General Public?"

"Yes"

Next dumb question please...

"A dedicated button turns off the microphones and any camera"

CORRECTION: "A dedicated button CLAIMS to turn off the microphones and any camera"

And if you believe that horseshit, come on over and I'll sell you the Golden Gate Bridge at a super-cheap price.

Six?

I can see benefits to all form factors, and letting users choose, but that means I also think they should be able to choose which UI they want to use. I can see the argument for locking the phone into a phone UI, at least while making calls, but otherwise I find the whole idea gross.

I suspect this is not for people like us (most of us anyway). This is for younger people - people who grew up with iPads and smart phones. I've never wanted a touchscreen laptop, but I have seen lots of young people who don't use computers much try to touch the screen on a computer. It isn't particularly efficient, but it is what a lot of young people expect... not having it introduces a point of friction.

According to the memo, metrics such as AI adoption rates, token consumption, code changes, and code reviews become "deeply flawed" when they are disconnected from actual results. Turning them into targets, Amazon says, encourages wasteful behavior that clashes with its emphasis on "frugality and simplicity" and can raise both compute bills and software complexity.

It's almost as if they're just now realizing Goodhart's Law exists.

Apple was right that suckers would pay for a laptop and then pay again for a tablet with the same kernel but a different UI.