No upbraiding. I'm not trying to vilify or exalt Disney, Tesla, or Elon, nor do I expect anyone else to do so.
I'm just saying the article headline is deceptive, perhaps amusingly so. And I'm a bit surprised that the discussion appears to be mostly about the movie, with little about the Tesla display-mode.
But I am wondering whose idea this was: Disney's (for the product placement) or Tesla's (for appropriation of coolness)? I'm guessing the latter.
It seems most people posting her are Tron fans talking about the movie.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the headline. No, Tron Ares Mode does not turn Teslas into glowing light-cycles. It changes the avatar for the vehicle displayed on the infotainment screen. At least TFS got that right.
We haven't been "at war" with anyone since WWII, although the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama, Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Somalia, Haiti, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, etc. might disagree a little bit.
I was talking about a war declared by Congress. That's the only kind that matters when it comes to a charge of treason.
And yes, you're right, the last time that happened was World War II. Armed conflicts have occurred since then, but they're not the same.
The only current war we have is that of the current administration against the US Constitution.
FTFY.
Currently the USA is not at war with anyone. Therefore it is impossible for anyone to commit treason. They might be doing something else illegal, but you can't call it treason.
"he's in full support, he just wants to change the entire meaning" Do you ever listen to how stupid you sound...
Wrong, your ignorance is on display. He wants the meaning of the authors of the amendment. Not the reimagined meaning of the modern far left.
If they meant that they would have written it that way.
They did. Today some folks are trying to interpret the language differently than originally intended.
But that doesn't matter because the admin is doing it in bad faith.
What bad faith? That interpreting "subject to the jurisdiction of the US" (or whatever the actual language is, didn't look it up) is not referring to those in the US legally? That's not bad faith, that's an honest interpretation to be decided by the Supreme Court. It is arguably what the original authors meant, and how it was read in those days.
But basically your "Democrats racist because 1860s" is just deeply deeply unserious and should be ignored.
Wrong. 1860s. 1880s. 1900s. 1920s. 1940s. 1960s. And starting in the 1920s it the was the democrats nationally, not just in the south. The klan was national by that point, and its strong influence within the Democratic Party also national. The republican courting of southern democrats in the 1960s and 70s was law and order based, not klan belief system based. It was an era of violent protest, where marxist/maoist inspired radicals (its what they self identified as) fomented violence.
None of that proves or even remotely backs up your assertion, and if you don't know that Hollywood is in the middle of the desert, you're way too uninformed to be convincing about this line of FUD and lies.
My assertion that what, panels in the desert won't be as low maintenance as folks assumed? That the deserts people are building solar panel farms in aren't barren dunes?
Your point is pointless. But if you want to die on this hill, be my guest.
Higher quality results are pointless, that is a unique perspective you have.
It's like the stupid minority, trans, and others that choose to fake hate crimes against themselves to prove how the attacks are common and how they are victims.
Those things do in fact happen. And they are common. No need to fake them, though some lunatics might.
That still looks like net flows to me, and not the in and outflow for each country.
Net positive flow of millionaires in doesn't mean that many aren't also leaving.
Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.
Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works and change it to do what you want. Access to the source code is a prerequisite for this freedom.
Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so that you can help others.
Freedom 3: The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others. This allows you to give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes.
The proposal for non commercial use, license otherwise violates all for freedoms.
If you need a license to use it the way that you want it violates the principals of open source.
The concept is you should be able to receive the source code with the default license and use it as you wish. If you require extra licensing to use it as you wish it cannot be part of the ecosystem and is not open source.
What kind of fucking wingnut believes in AGW and then lights a forest fire?
Someone who is even more mentally unhinged than someone who would start a forest fire deliberately in the first place.
Sorry to drag out a cliché, but "both sides" have 'em. It's up to the rest of us to have a rational conversation without them.
I think we agree that tax-dodgers should be punished. But I don't think that punishment should be revocation of citizenship.
As for treason, at least in the USA, it is defined clearly in the Constitution as waging war against the USA or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. Not tax-dodging or leaving (even fleeing) the country.
I also agree that ill-gotten (i.e., illegal) gains should be "taxed" at 100%. There's a legal term for doing that. But again, it has nothing to do with treason or revocation of citizenship.
Make sure that they, and their families citizenship is revoked
Two things:
1. To have your citizenship revoked, you have to commit treason, obtain citizenship fraudulently, or commit some disqualifying crime within a certain period of obtaining conditional citizenship. Simply leaving the country doesn't qualify.
2. Back at least as far as biblical times, humanity has recognized the injustice of suffering the sins of the father on the son. So no, you can't revoke citizenships of families because of the acts of a single member.
"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull
