What does nimbyism have to do with anything here?
The claim would be it's primarily NIMBY folks who prevent more construction and in more places, leading to landlords having more power and ability to make renters jump through such hoops.
If only it was that simple.
They still have assets in the state in question, which means they are very much reachable.
Sounds like misinformation right there, perhaps a ban is in order?
Oh wait... I wasn't advocating for bans nor pushing definitons.
Removing misinformation is not illegal either. It's common sense.
Who decides it's misinformation?
Quite a few times things which were deemed misinformation back during the COVID times turned out to be different than official sources said (at first or later).
When such heavy hands occur, especially when the government is pushing it, it makes the act seem extra suspicious, or so I've heard for the last week along cries of fascism.
Which is why I took advantage of the pandemic to GTFO of the Seattle area and are now in a much better place, the issue is always that not all companies are open to remote work, and those who are have states they can/can't hire in.
Remote work has not continued the way many had hoped. Too many companies, Microsoft included have largely decreed that if you want to keep your job, you're going to have to live/work in one of their hubs, or be very lucky. As a result, not only are many stuck there, but many medium and small companies have done the same. Yes, remote jobs exist, they are just few and far between and much harder to get than even a couple of years ago.
And fund schools enough
Enough⦠according to who?
Given weâ(TM)ve been throwing more and more money at (public) education for decades and decades and havenâ(TM)t seen the kinds of results desired or promised⦠maybe itâ(TM)s not simply a money issue?
That's an interesting link, thank you.
The "nuances or causal factors" do show up -- somewhat -- farther down that report:
It is sometimes less obvious when an electric burner is turned on or is still hot than it is with gas burners. In addition, once turned off, it takes time for an electric burner to cool. UL 858, Household Electric Ranges, which took effect in June of 2018, includes requirements for electric coil ranges to prevent the ignition of cooking oil. Compliance may be demonstrated by either not igniting cooking oil in a cast iron pan or keeping the average temperature of the inside bottom surface of the pan below or equal to 725F (385C). All electrical coil ranges being manufactured now must meet these requirements. Because ranges last a long time, it could be years before these safer ranges become common in US homes.
Fair. MY point is that I don't trust that source because whomever/whatever wrote it made a logical error.
OK. But copied the quote from where? I can't find a source worded like that.
"According to Forbes, there were 868 U.S. billionaires as of 2025, holding a combined wealth of $6.72 trillion as of the end of 2024, a decrease from the 813 reported by Forbes in its April 2024 list but with increased overall wealth.
How is 868 a decrease from 813?
"You just have to ensure that your prompt uses terrible grammar and is one massive run-on sentence like this one which includes all the information before any full stop which would give the guardrails a chance to kick in before the jailbreak can take effect and guide the model into providing a "toxic" or otherwise verboten response the developers had hoped would be filtered out."
Is this example of terrible grammar intentional or unintentional?
Something
Unfortunately not, as it'd be easy to replicate. Right now I'm just using what I've built to prove I'm very real when talking with recruiters.
Oh, it's a good dupe. Some people are telling me it's one of the best dupes.
Surprise your boss. Get to work on time.
