Comment Re:Are dupes also gabage patches? (Score 2) 118
Oh, it's a good dupe. Some people are telling me it's one of the best dupes.
Oh, it's a good dupe. Some people are telling me it's one of the best dupes.
Inquiring minds want to know.
Please go back and look at the post I originally responded to, and read it carefully, looking at its logic.
The school would rather see a child arrested than be the site of a mass shooting or lawsuit.
Setting aside your "or lawsuit", would you rather have a school be the site of a mass shooting than see a child arrested?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Bemjamin Franklin
Yep. We all know that quote, and probably most of us agree with it.
There's a huge difference between "a little temporary Safety", though, and an absence of mass shootings.
The school would rather see a child arrested than be the site of a mass shooting or lawsuit.
Setting aside your "or lawsuit", would you rather have a school be the site of a mass shooting than see a child arrested?
The problem with absolute statements is they are disproven by evidence. The world is run on Windows, professionally. It literally makes the world go around and contributes a shitton to the GDP of nations the world over.
The problem with statements is they are disproven by "literally".
This looks useful. Thank you.
You're not being too picky. The summary pretends there's only one temperature in play, whereas the original source mentions at least two temperatures (one defined after a phonon-phonon equilibration time; and a more conventional thermodynamical temperature which is only well-defined after a longer time). The sensationalism comes from thinking the longer-time-scale one applies at very short time-scales.
It's shit like that which makes headlines and then makes people distrust research.
'Exonate'?
:) Of course you're right, which means extrapolation is gonna be a
Careful. The unpacking of all those parentheses may cause us to run out of memory on the acronym stack.
It's far faster than exponential (assuming that's 1% of a constant-size market, then 2% of the same market, etc.). The first doubling time was 8 years; an exponential growth process would keep the same doubling time, but it took another 2.9 years to double again.
So your "not even close" is correct, in that exponential growth is far slower than whatever this is.
Thanks. It doesn't appear in my Apps list, so I probably took it out via the ADB interaction. However, I don't like seeing it in the list of possible "Digital Assistants" if it's been uninstalled.
Oblig. Dr. Ian Malcolm: "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
That's good to hear!
Now, how do I rip out Gemini, or ensure it's never installed?
Only through hard work and perseverance can one truly suffer.