Comment Re:deepseek? (Score 1) 76
Didn't deepseek prove that we can have AI at a fraction of the energy cost?
It dit, right before it discovered the Jevons paradox.
Didn't deepseek prove that we can have AI at a fraction of the energy cost?
It dit, right before it discovered the Jevons paradox.
Here's the thing though. I don't think nut milk producers are trying to fake people out. A huge part of their value proposition is that their milk doesn't come from animals, just like goat milk suppliers aren't going to want you to miss that the milk comes from goats, not cows. Same for veggie meats and sausages.
Cow tittie milk should be labeled "cow tittie milk" to remind people where the product comes from. It's natural for mammals to drink the tittie milk of their own species when they're young, but drinking tittie milk (a) when you're grown up and (b) from another species seems downright perverse. Likewise, people could use a good reminder how the meat they eat is produced.
of course the helicopter parents screaming because they aren't tethered 24x7 to their child.
In Finland we've just started the first phone-free school year. Apparently, some parents are getting doctor's orders to allow their child to keep their phone, for situations such as anxiety attacks (article in Finnish). It's a miracle how such kids would have survived before mobile phones.
34 was my age when I quit my day job, thanks to Linux and the floodgates of open source software it opened for me.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F...
Force them to call it rent if they reserve the right to yank it back
I think a long-term rental is called "leash" for this reason.
Everyone uses VPNs to bypass the Great Wall and get news from the outside world. Sounds like Britain's moving in the same direction. What a sobering thought!
I have a hard time believing that a particular encryption will remain unbreakable, quantum computers or not. At the moment, we have Shor's algorithm for factoring numbers on QCs, so we should avoid relying on the hardness of factorization. How can we be sure that there won't be new algorithms in the future that break the current "post-quantum" encryption?
During my advanced math studies, I only took a rather introductory course on encryption, including stuff like Galois fields and elliptic curves. I recall my professor saying that none of the current encryption methods (besides something like the one-time pad) are proven to be safe; we just don't know any efficient methods of breaking them at the moment.
Indeed and I just found one: IQ is not measured in percent and cannot be measured in percent. It makes no sense to do so.
Why not? It's originally a quotient of two numbers multiplied by 100, just like any other percentage.
"Originally, IQ was a score obtained by dividing a person's mental age score, obtained by administering an intelligence test, by the person's chronological age, both expressed in terms of years and months. The resulting fraction (quotient) was multiplied by 100 to obtain the IQ score." https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
Parts per million - so it increased from practically zero to practically zero.
Practically zero, just like the thickness of the atmosphere relative to the size of Earth.
The stock market is not a zero sum game. You invest in companies that have useful economic activity, and get a share of their profits as dividends.
Fair point, but there are a lot of large and influential companies that don't pay any dividends, because they invest their profits directly into growth and development. For example Nvidia.... well, they seem to pay 0.03 % of the current stock price, so essentially zero. The only economically sensible reason to invest in them is speculation; if there's some "useful economic activity" involved, the only way you'll get a piece of it is by buying low and selling high.
With cryptocurrency, the only thing you have is capital appreciation. There is no social utility. Even commodities like gold that also aren't income producing still have industrial uses, and are not purely speculative.
Cryptocurrencies have the same utility as banks, and many banks have been working on their own blockchains for years, for example JP Morgan: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffintechmagazine.com%2Far...
The stock market comparison is really just a side effect of what cryptocurrencies are all about, which is transferring money in ways that traditional banks can't do -- pseudonymously and independent of governments or businesses. Store of value and speculation is one thing, but you can't send NVDA shares (or gold, or tulips) across the globe with this kind of speed and freedom. Cryptocurrencies have value because they provide this service, you don't really pay just for the store of value.
A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on. -- Samuel Goldwyn