Fair point, but there are a lot of large and influential companies that don't pay any dividends, because they invest their profits directly into growth and development. For example Nvidia.... well, they seem to pay 0.03 % of the current stock price, so essentially zero. The only economically sensible reason to invest in them is speculation; if there's some "useful economic activity" involved, the only way you'll get a piece of it is by buying low and selling high.

Cryptocurrencies have the same utility as banks, and many banks have been working on their own blockchains for years, for example JP Morgan: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffintechmagazine.com%2Far...

The stock market comparison is really just a side effect of what cryptocurrencies are all about, which is transferring money in ways that traditional banks can't do -- pseudonymously and independent of governments or businesses. Store of value and speculation is one thing, but you can't send NVDA shares (or gold, or tulips) across the globe with this kind of speed and freedom. Cryptocurrencies have value because they provide this service, you don't really pay just for the store of value.

Inductive heating of gold nanoparticles is a thing in cancer research, e.g. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go...

So it's just like the regular stock market.

Math and science geeks know this, and that's why we use proper formatting tools such as LaTeX, not a glorified Paint.

You axolotl questions.

The history of AI is all about modeling human intelligence, just like the models we have in natural sciences. If the model happens to be a very good match with reality, we may sometimes mistake one for the other. OTOH, they may be the same thing for all practical purposes.

I'm not sure if I have any deeper intelligence than a fancy language model. When we say that LLMs don't really understand things, then what exactly do we mean by understanding? In my personal definition, the meaning of something is simply the graph of its associated things. I consider something very meaningful if the graph has a lot of nodes and edges, and this also explains why simple things gain more meaning as we age.

Well, if it's OK for a business to freely use copyrighted material for their commercial, for-profit purposes, then it throws out all arguments against non-commercial, non-profit "piracy". In other words, the court cases make a great test for the whole idea of copyright — they can't have their cake and eat it too.

How would an AI mine Bitcoin? Two extremes come to mind:

(a) It uses a language model to compute SHA2-256 hashes "by hand", and starts demanding more data centers to make a decent buck.

(b) It figures out a vulnerability in SHA2-256 and takes over the network.

you were told not to (a) copy that floppy and (b) waste precious energy on cryptocurrency mining. But when big companies are building data centers for industrial-scale copyright infringement, it's suddenly OK. Because it's "busyness" done by white men in uncomfortable suits, not by idealistic young hobbyists.

At the risk of devolving this thread, I blame Nouvelle Vague. They play Bossa Nova versions of New Wave songs.

SSAB has been developing a carbon-free steel process for years, using hydrogen to reduce the ore. https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ssab.com%2Fen%2Ffossil...

The average Joe might not know who this Jules guy is, but he might know about calories, which is a well-defined multiple of joules.

For years and years I've used the ignore_nice_load option in Linux cpufreq governors. If I know the task will be running longer and it doesn't matter if it takes a bit longer, I'll set its niceness level higher, so it won't trigger an increase in the CPU frequency.

I've also used my own scripts for turning applications on/off depending on electricity price for quite a while. I've only bought my electricity with the hourly market rate for about a year and a half, but the idea really started with my profitability scripts for cryptocurrency mining sometime in the early 2010s.

Besides the cost, another reason why I like to throttle my systems all the time is fan noise. I've always built my systems with low power consumption and noise in mind, starting with Mini-ITX boards in late 2003. I've always admired how laptops can be made with lower power parts, and wondered why they don't just use the same parts in "desktop" machines. Why should you consume power william nilliam just because it's plugged in?

That's like saying that Finland has the best mämmi in the world. While technically true, it doesn't make Finland a great country in any other sense. It's only when Finland wins the world championship in ice hockey or the Eurovision Song Contest, then we are a global superpower in all fields for a short while.

I've been to Hungary a couple of times and I have nothing against the people and culture in general, but I won't be touching the country with a bargepole while Orban is in charge.

Switching to OpenCL would give you a lot more hardware/vendor options than CUDA. OTOH, if this new company can put a lot of RISC-V cores on one die, why don't they just make a massively multicore CPU?