Comment Re:Chinese are going to eat our lunch (Score 1) 23
With "AI"? Hahahaha, no. You have listened to too much hype-propaganda lies.
With "AI"? Hahahaha, no. You have listened to too much hype-propaganda lies.
Yep. LLMs can do one thing well: bureaucracy. Making that cheaper means getting more of it and that is the last thing anybody sane would want. Because it ultimately kills everything.
That won't stop TPTB from employing robot police to beat human protesters, instead of employing humans to do the same job.
Which is really not rational. There are always enough sadist scum that are willing to beat people as long as they are not held accountable for it.
Sure. And on the minus-side, everything stops working after a short while. Not feeding people is something even an authoritarian asshole like Xi (or Trump) cannot afford.
no, because to him the definition of waste, fraud, and abuse is money spent on education, research and public well-being. Remember, his business is a club for shady deals.
It is. When the orange rapist talks about how "we are winning", that "we" does not include you.
No, the anti-MAGA are. You fell in line behind a nice old man with a brain rot, then you threw him under the bus for a cardboard cutout and you lost everything. The MAGA stuck behind a nasty geezer with a brain rot, won and destroyed your illusions about "America". We saw you for what you truly are, little crying pussies who have no spine. But Jesus, look at how loud your mouths are.
Why would one need to do this in an MBA outfit?
You don't attend one to learn things, that's what you do in undergrad. You don't attend one to do research, for that you attend a program that lets you do a PhD.
The MBA outfits aren't schools, they are clubs where you make acquaintances to do business. Hence the large membership fee.
You again painting the Big Beautiful Economic Picture black for no reason at all.
Yes, there are tariffs, but they are taming inflation as revenues come in, and make Americans richer because of all that windfall payment mountain - 100 billions!!11! HUNDRED BILLIONS US DALLARS!111!1 - every month.
And there are now plenty of jobs that will be available to new AI graduates.
They can go to the factory shop to assemble great American automobiles, like the GREAT American FIAT 124 clone.
They can go to the fields to pick the Great American crops.
They can go to the farms to take care of the Great American pigs.
Finally, they can work for ICE and help the Country remove all those Invaders.
There is a bright future ahead, and only you, the people entrenched in the Big Globalist Lie are blocking it from happening.
Really?
If anything, Napster told us another story - no matter how innovative and revolutionary you are, without a proper institutional backing you'll get devastated very quickly.
The successful entrepreneurs read the signs and sold out to all of the above instead of embracing the "asking for forgiveness instead of permission startup" bullshit.
Having Zuck pay you a hundred million and shield you from litigation with his CIA-sponsored outfit is nowhere near to what Napster was.
Some of us actually prefer reading stuff on dead trees rather than eye straining screens (e-ink or not).
Yes, some (=few) do that. And hence it is a specialty item. For books, there are now "print on demand" machines that can make single copies cheap enough. But mass-production of books is over or rather will be over when the printing-presses for that reach the end of their lifetime.
Yes. And with "AI" the pay will get even lower in the "trash" segment than it already is.
Yep, the spec is broken right there. There are already two major cases where this will not be true: (a) no dog at that time and (b) no dog at all, because no customers. Obviously this task was defined by an incompetent that does not understand border cases.
Incidentally, I had some exams in my CS studies where I had to fix the questions because they were broken. Always got the points from the TAs doing the grading in the review, although in one case I had to suggest I could explain why the question was broken to the prof.
How long until people quit learning programming languages?
Never. There is tons of advanced stuff where you need that knowledge and were AI cannot do anything because insight is required. If you just do simple coding with CPU and memory overkill and no security requirements, sure, "AI" may do most of it. But that is not the situation in most important projects.
The fancy is indeed no other than a mode of memory emancipated from the order of space and time. -- Samuel Taylor Coleridge