Proplexity is pretty snippetty and judgy in their rebuttal. I think they're caught and trying to misdirect.

I don't but that comment one bit. Show me a company that has AI chips just sitting on shelves because they can't sell them to China. It doesn't exist. So how was there a lost sale?
They can't make them fast enough right now as it stands.

Didn't he grant the okay to use his voice before he died? I remember something of that nature coming up.
Though maybe it wasn't a free for all usage.

If say it also runs on nearly everything. or another way to say that is that it has been run in more unique devices than anything else, most likely.

It's dry air in Arizona. It's humid as hell in Florida. If you want to pull moisture out of the air I would think that would be a better location.

...Says the guy who raises prices so that the price to performance metric does not move. If better more advanced devices stayed at the same old price then the price to performance gets better. But NGreedia abandoned that policy.

That said, the money doesn't go all to AI components. You need the rest of the computer, racks, data centers, utilities, and software.

Yeah, and then they can't call for help when a shooter shows up. Yay!

Maybe we can worry about phones after we solve the guns problem.

Isn't this the whole reason we have a list of revoked certs?
If they get revoked all old "good" things signed with those certs need to be resigned and posted, but suck it up buttercup. It needs to be done.
Otherwise there's no trust in anything.

But they absolutely *must* charge 30% per transaction or they just couldn't survive another agonizing day.

The QR code should always be accompanied by a URL so you can just go there when the camera doesn't cooperate.

I buy a car once, then it's mine. I can start it when I want and go where I want. When I buy a DVD and want to watch it on my phone I need to re-buy it. For a little while a lot of things were consolidated at Netflix, and things were good. Then they all got greedy and broke everything up again. While the industry insists on being siloed there will always be piracy.

It would be a lot easier to detect if it just changed color, period. The requirement of ultraviolet light means you either need to be outside or have an ultraviolet light present.

Don't get me wrong though, it's a lot better than nothing (aka, the current situation).

We didn't ban you because of your political viewpoint, we banned you because you're an a-hole. That's still legal.

At the same time if they allowed it to hit Bing.com every time a user launched the browser without visiting the site then they'd get complaints that they're raising server usage in an anti-competitive manner. It's a can't win situation.

Though, It should just have the setting and let the user enable it or not. There's no reason to check which site is enabled.

If they communicate in high frequencies (like dogs can hear) or low frequencies (like elephants can hear) but we can't, then it'll be a lot harder.