Comment Re:That old idea again (Score 1) 83
No, if you read it says that read performance is pretty much equal to uncompressed DRAM so you don't have to take a latency penalty.
No, if you read it says that read performance is pretty much equal to uncompressed DRAM so you don't have to take a latency penalty.
Those "very special" use cases are actually fairly common. I routinely deal with data structures in software I write that are read-mostly: large data tables that are accessed in the inner loop (so need fast access) but whose data is updated infrequently (anywhere from minutes to days between changes, and often the changes are in batches so many changes can be applied in one operation). Being able to put them in compressed memory would free up a lot of normal memory for things that do actively change, which would speed up the application noticeably.
I don't think CRAM is a solution to the current memory price crunch, but it's certainly an interesting idea. The Redis cache software, for example, would probably benefit highly from higher capacity. And of course the same techniques can be adapted to flash/SSD drives where the memory itself isn't necessarily the speed bottleneck.
Either it was stupid or it was satire, and sadly I can't really guess which is more likely.
Kinda like a
that presented themselves as "male" were paid more per task and perceived as more "human-like" than their "female" counterparts
Those complaining loudest are the ones, who can't define the term "woman".
Daemon Spawn at that.
we need to regulate speech then, exactly the same way we want to regulate firearms.
Only those authorized by the state ought to have speech. Safety First!
(this is largely sarcastic in nature)
Yeah, have the big AI companies cleaned their raw data sources for newer models or are they still using original scrapes of teh internets, just putting guardrails and instructions in place to discount specific data?
Pretty sure whatever he died from came from bats. Or hamsters
We're all the descendents of the people who for whatever genetic reason survived the plagues in the past and thats why plaque hasn't reoccured as an epidemic since the middle ages.
Except - that was our (mostly) ancestors acquiring a degree of immunity to a strain of the bacterium circulating 250 and more years ago.
It's fairly unlikely that current wild-type strains are the same strain.
Bacteria do evolve in the wild, you know. (Everything evolves in the wild.)
With permanent DST we won't get the stories twice a year.
The bigger you are, the harder it is to turn the ship in an emergency. See Titanic.
At some point the inertia of change isn't worth it, as you suggested. It is possible, but is it worth it?
The last way to look at this is a way to start the process of diversifying our Tech holdings. Windows, Office, Adobe, VMWare etc. But here is my take, STEAM is showing the way out. We're not there yet, but the tide appears to be turning (to keep the nautical terms going).
Broken clocks are still broken, even when they occasionally tell the time correctly.
They'll need the money to settle all the resulting lawsuits.
How many NASA managers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? "That's a known problem... don't worry about it."