Comment Huh (Score 1) 65
And OpenAI's models also accessed the website of the U.S. Commerce Department using credentials found in online code repositories, according to the article.
Dang lucky it was them then, seeing how anybody could have done that.
Comment Re:NO one thinks this merger is a good idea.... (Score 0) 114
Like I said they might try to incorporate in another state in order to do bad things to people
Do you
Just a little nagging, uneasy feeling, that perhaps things and people are not all good or all bad?
Comment Oh, you don't? (Score 1) 114
The article notes that California attorney general Rob Bonta still said "I don't think these two companies should merge"
Well, that's nice.
Fortunately, we're still a sorta free country, so they are doing it anyway. Regardless of what you think, commissar.
Comment I had thought ... (Score 1) 55
Comment Re:Purchase complete! (Score 1) 71
User: I'm thinking of getting a new car.
Muse: Ok... I have sold your current car and have purchased a new one. I have also resigned from your job and applied for a new one with a better salary so that you can afford the repayments on the new car. I have also taken the liberty of sending flowers to the woman you talked to yesterday at the supermarket. She is quite wealthy. I calculate that if you can marry her within the year your financial problems will be further eased. She is already married, but I have sent suspicious letters to their address to prompt a divorce... Is there anything else you would like me to do?
Yeah, exactly. I definitely don't need or want an "agent" to do things in my life.
Research and organize some info, maybe. Write some code, maybe. Draft something that won't piss people off as much as something I would say off the cuff, maybe.
Buy things for me, or do personal communications for me in non-draft mode? Definitely not.
Comment Re:why should I read it (Score 1) 56
If you didn't want to write it
Isn't the more salient question whether you want to read it?
Comment Re:Not completely safe (Score 1) 136
Why not stop this madness and focus on PARENTS?
Why not indeed? I'm sure that Eurocrats and their supporters are widely known for their devotion to parents being in control, right?
Firstly, not giving unrestricted devices to minors.
Oh sure, society will support that. Why, let's take a poll right here on
Secondly, having PARENTS be in the driver's seat to control what sites/people/services are allowed for their children.
Fine with me. Actually fine with the people here who are complaining about this system? Not so much.
Well, you get the idea. Complainers are fine with blaming parents for everything. Letting parents have actual control over their own children though (which would be needed, to go with responsibility), not so much.
Comment Well .... (Score 1) 136
...surely if we can ban metal tubes with things that go boom inside them, then we can ban pre-teens from using social media, yes?
We've never let the impossible stop us before!
Comment Re:Only High I.Q. individuals need apply (Score 0, Troll) 372
To be fair, you only need a room temperature level of IQ to be smarter than literally anyone in the current administration so that isn't a very high bar to clear. I'm sure Trump will promote his Mar-a-Largo janitor to AI Czar if he pledges to give Trump a daily hand job.
Wait... no that poor guy is probably in an ICE detention camp.
I'd be more than happy to vote for smart guys. The problem is, the "smart" guys were all busily importing millions of hostiles, and pretending that boys could magically turn into girls. When they weren't deciding to "defund" the police
If you are worse than the clown, then the problem isn't the clown
Comment Re:You can always find a whiner, even fringe ones (Score 1) 211
Yeah, that's my experience too. I haven't seen anyone flip the T'birds the bird.
Back when Top Gun owned Miramar, I'd go down to a relative's house for the yearly airshow. The Angels had a rendezvous point nearby, and we'd see them go by at perhaps a 60 degree angle right over the house. It seemed like they were at 200' as we could clearly see the pilot looking out. Then we'd go to the nighttime show afterwards. Good times.
Comment Re:Air Crew hours are priceless (Score 1) 211
All good points. Somewhat OT, I remember aircrews hating the Balanced Budget Reconciliation (2012 or so?), where the grownups in the Capitol decided to live within a budget, and each side gave up certain things. Training funds for the military was one of the losers.
Both sides hated it. Hated! And that was the last time the government tried to live within a budget, regardless of administration.
Comment Re:That is Republicans in TX (was Re:Uh, no) (Score 1) 75
Well said.
Comment Re:Americans love the flyovers. For many man decad (Score 0) 211
Are you kidding? Flyovers are nothing new. And they tend to be incredibly popular, people love them, and have loved them for many many decades. Since the US military started flying. Well Americans do. I'm sure Putin wasn't very happy with his flyover demonstration.
But
Comment Time for grumpy old man stuff ... (Score 2, Insightful) 48
... the
And I gotta say, their standards for "non-malicious" could be pretty low, lol.
Just interesting to see how things change, with the fashions and slogans of the time. (And how people who would swear that they are immune to fashion tend to follow along with it.)