Comment Re:F-droid has it (Score 1) 60
At the surface level, I disagree. Smartphones are ubiquitous and there are a LOT of people using them that don't understand the risks.
A LOT of people don't understand risks OS vendors pose to their privacy, security and safety. Nor do they understand the opportunity costs they pay for allowing unfair monopolization of marketplaces where a single company gets carte blanch to do as they please while everyone else is held captive to their whims.
As someone that has to support those people, I support Play Store apps being more restrictive.
The play store is the very reason for race to the bottom incentive structures resulting in app stores full of malware existing primarily for data exfiltration. If the OS vendors cared about "people" they would provide users with necessary controls to prevent apps from exerting take it or leave it demands upon users. They instead side with app vendors at every turn because it makes them money.
That said, I think Android's current methods of allowing 3rd party apps/stores could be improved. I don't know what the best solution would be, but something like a security option to enable "less secure" apps in the store could work.
How do you know app stores or apps are less secure? Less secure than what? Less secure than stock Android + GPS where everything including basic official Google calculator and keyboard apps spy on you?