That's not how LLMs work. While they are trained on existing data, they are also capable of reasoning. They can produce novel solutions to problems.
Just because they don't work the same way as a the human brain doesn't mean that they are not capable of this sort of thing.
Leap hours are just a legal thing to satisfy countries that require UT to be synchronized with the orbit of the Earth around the sun. There won't be one for centuries, i.e. it's so far out that it can be ignored.
Seinfeld went to Israel and visited the IDF camps where they train people to participate in genocide. That's not a joke, that's becoming directly involved in a crime against humanity.
That's the fig leaf that is always used. "It's just a joke! I'm not hurting anyone!" Then they use the platform and money to hurt people. JK Rowling is another example. "It's just a children's book!" (never mind that she also writes shit adults novels under a male name). She funds hate groups and their lawsuits, which has recently resulted in an extremely damaging change in the law in the UK.
Speech does not happen in a vacuum.
Do you have benchmarks for AI performance? That seems more relevant here.
Also which Apple machine are you comparing to? The M5 performance depends heavily on thermal and power limits. That website is probably using the desktop version with much better cooling and a higher power limit than any of Apple's portable offerings.
It doesn't really matter if it makes a useful contribution to the field.
It's hard to say if it is due to AI being something novel, of it they threw similar amounts of money at humans working in the field they could get a similar result. Maybe it doesn't matter, because humans take decades to train to this level, and their built their AI in years.
The need for them came from relativity, but the atomic clocks needed to be able to handle such fine corrections are based on the hyperfine transition of 133Cs. You're not getting very far on atomic clocks without particle physics
yes, because it didn't kill you, obviously it doesn't kill anyone.
Personally I think the "killing people" is largely bullshit, but your reasoning is flawed.
I've been on planes with hundreds of people per flight. Their experience is the same as mine. No one keeled over. This ain't just me homie. And I'm not going to provide citations with everyone I ever flew with - that's thousands of people. I only relate that people don't die because they changed timezones. If this was a regular occurrence across many people, people would notice.
That you think that my relating a personal experience over many years is flawed reasoning only shows you didn't have anything useful to say, but that didn't stop you from saying something. Good work, coward.
"You are a rather solipsistic fellow aren't you? You never got on or off a bus in the dark so no one does."
Literally the opposite of what I said. Are you having Gemini write your comments?
Must be Drinkypoo derangement syndrome. That was a misread on my part, mea maxima culpa's all around But.....
Validate your claim that DST kills people. Shifting a timezone should have exactly the same effect. One hour plus or minus, should be showing dead people as a direct cause. And I don't take back that you are solipsistic.
Shifting one timezone should have exactly the same effect. Death. Explain why it does not.
This is the first I'm hearing that photons created with technology are functionally different from naturally produced photons.
Kids still end up in the dark when the days get short.
My solution is not the same. You seem to have missed the 'fixed' concept. As in 'no Daylight Saving adjustments'.
Outside workers will benefit more from dropping the adjustment ' they'd keep daylight in the middle of their work day instead of having it shifted towards evening.
Go to bed at night, and get up in the morning, at the same 'natural times' every day regardless of what the clock is set to. Move an hour of chores from evenings to mornings if you are awake too early for school or work. DST or not might have to be an issue for school, work, and shopping. It doesn't have to define sleep.
So when we are on permanent DST, I have to go to work late in December? Or at 4 in the morning during the summer? And across time zones and latitudes, making corrections for everyone?
Sorry, but perhaps in prehistoric times up to the early 1700's your "natural" system might work. It definitely does not in an interconnected world. A whole lot of us have to know what time people show up for work in cities and countries we communicate with. Example: One place I would call was on the west coast. Their workday was 7:30 to 4:30. They were 3 hours behind my time. So if I need to call them at my time, I have to wait until 10:30 Eastern Time. If I have to call Mumbai Adding an element of randomness is just going to make the juggling worse
Sounds like Newton. Long tradition, I guess
Executive ability is deciding quickly and getting somebody else to do the work. -- John G. Pollard
