I must admit I didn't know about the Maverick until a couple weeks ago. It's certainly never in the news.

It's also interesting that Ford is apparently planning an EV version (eventually).

Well, don't forget that the US does produce a LOT of oil domestically, and the fortunes of those oil billionaires aren't going to protect themselves!

Uh, I'm gonna say "no".

Lutnick is also the guy who thought Americans would get really excited at the possibility of millions of new jobs screwing tiny screws into iPhones all day.

These administration billionaires really do think everyone else exists basically to be their slave labor, and the slaves should be happy about it.

An autonomous (or semi-autonomous) robot could be used for robbing banks, and it would be more bullet-resistant than a human.

Are those two things somehow mutually exclusive?

That's actually a good question. Inks have changed somewhat over the past 5,000 years, and there's no particular reason to think that tattoo inks have been equally mobile across this timeframe.

But now we come to a deeper point. Basically, tattoos (as I've always understand it) are surgically-engineered scars, with the scar tissue supposedly locking the ink in place. It's quite probable that my understanding is wrong - this isn't exactly an area I've really looked into in any depth, so the probability of me being right is rather slim. Nonetheless, if I had been correct, then you might well expect the stuff to stay there. Skin is highly permeable, but scar tissue less so. As long as the molecules exceed the size that can migrate, then you'd think it would be fine.

That it isn't fine shows that one or more of these ideas must be wrong.

I mean, that would explain a lot about Pete Hegseth...

They don't forget - they simply don't think the same rules the unwashed masses are required to live under should apply to them.

It's like they spent all their time on cutesy little behaviors versus doing the hard work of building an actual functional digital assistant.

Anyone other than me get annoyed when you try to ask Siri something and, midway through while you're still talking, Siri decides to interject "Uh huh?" It's incredibly irritating and distracting. And then, 75% of the time, Siri either does the wrong thing or silently just goes away without doing anything.

This guy put together and managed a crappy team that probably should be let go in its entirety. I'm sure he's got a nice retirement package though, nice work if you can get it.

News for Nuns.

But who is the third nun?

Hey, technically correct is the best kind of correct!

The git commit history, perchance?

We can, and likely will. The headline is poorly worded and misleading - de rigueur for Slashdot unfortunately.