Comment Re:Can we extract? (Score 1) 14
If we can get the"thing that makes them young" into old people they can be young again?!
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.imdb.com%2Ftitle%2Ftt0...
If we can get the"thing that makes them young" into old people they can be young again?!
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.imdb.com%2Ftitle%2Ftt0...
At best you could fool someone like Peter Thiel I suppose.
Isn't that pretty much the standard tech business plan nowadays? Not to build a sustainably profitable company... but to pull something together that offers the best potential for a quick buyout in the shortest amount of time.
Or take a closer look at blood transfusions.
A biblical verse states the life of an organism is in its blood. It is blood that carries the nutrients, signalling molecules and even free mitochondria that probably signal the transplanted organ to turn younger. The bioelectric environment also matters, but probably not to the same extent as blood does to the transplanted heart.
completely unsubsidized
That's the issue here. Something unsubsidized without government involvement is generally considered at the whim of the people. Their objections can kill a project. On the flip side something subsidized is directly the result of enacting government policy. People don't come into it unless it's an election year, and even then in many "safe seats" people don't come into it at all. What they gonna do? Vote democrat? LOL
The problem here isn't the action taken initially, it's the follow-up.
1) Police shouldn't be approaching any situation in a way to get someone killed.
2) The courts shouldn't come into this. The point here is that we are in a "detained for questioning" stage. Virtually all of such cases are quickly resolved in the rest of the world. We're assuming a threat based in lack of information, we're not assuming intent yet. At most we should be talking about a several hour inconvenience, and that is perfectly acceptable for security in a modern society.
If everything resulted in crippling court fees then I'd agree with you, it's not appropriate. But that's a different issue that needs fixing. We shouldn't abolish police response to threats simply because the court system is fucked.
Ooooh if deaths from societal impact is what you were talking about, then I absolutely agree with you.
The issue with AI though is that it absolutely has benefits, but there most definitely need to exist guardrails. AI capabilities are still in their infancy, AI is currently treated with some guardrails, and yet... it has shown aggressive behaviour in the pursuit of its goal. Right now you can't trust Claude to book an appointment for your at the gym without it breaking the law, exploiting software flaws, and fraudulently modifying a database it doesn't own to kick some poor unwitting person out of their reserved time slot using actions that would get a normal person at a minimum a serious fine.
AI's usefulness is not in question, it's the severity of its implications given what we already know from its limited scope.
I agree, the car has nothing to do with it. You should buy a *portable* AM radio. It's your assertion that they are "going to do jack for you" that is just wrong and not supported by any actual emergency which has happened or advice from any emergency response group.
Emergency kits are important, and if you're travelling away from your city you should have one with your in your car.
If you're leaving home and going to a shelter you're not in an emergency, you're avoiding an emergency. It's a very important distinction to make, and one that reflects the fact that many emergencies require you to explicitly abandon the car.
A car is not part of an emergency kit. And when you get in your car, take your damn portable AM radio with you, you'll need it when you get out of the car, the emergency shelter is not a drive in theater.
If you travel a lot then you should have an emergency kit in your car as well (including a transistor radio). Let me guess, you don't even have a fully decked out first aid kit?
Here's the thing, preparedness is key, but not everyone needs to be prepared. You may have seen too many zombie movies, but what will typically happen in an emergency is that you're surrounded by people. You were at work? I bet you were in an office with an emergency response plan and hard line communication systems in place, and then you drove home right? I mean you didn't spend days in the office because the lights were out. Right? When you got home, did you go out to your car every few minutes to turn on the radio?
Have a think about what you actually did in those emergencies.
They AM has been used in all emergencies. Like seriously WTF are you talking about? There's hurricanes yearly, turn on the radio sometime.
Comments were made on the actual topic, remote frontier-level models.
Claims by the moron were made, yes. When the moron was pointed to the sources of the same remote frontier-level models that are available for inspection and asked to provide evidence of the claim, the moron engaged in every logical fallacy known.
Nope. You misrepresent the claim, which was: "Chinese AI is handicapped by training that has to conform with Chinese Communist Party doctrine and revisionist history."
Basically the Great Firewall carrying forward into the AI era for domestic use.
"The Great Firewall (GFW; Chinese: ; pinyin: Fánghu Cháng) is the combination of legislative actions and technologies enforced by the People's Republic of China to regulate the Internet domestically.[1] Its role in internet censorship in China is to block access to selected foreign websites and to slow down cross-border internet traffic."
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F...
China/s domestic AI will be handicapped since to solve a problem, one must accurately understand the problem. Domestic information control does not facilitate that.
You did nothing other than try to change to topic to international models outside the great firewall. And modest local models. These are both different things from the constrained domestically model described.
What didn't the moron do? Yes, they did not provide evidence.
Why? Because there isn't any,
There is no evidence because we are describing a race that is just beginning. Again, you misunderstand the discussion.
We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge. -- John Naisbitt, Megatrends