>"think of it as a lesson in why you should never commit to a product controlled by a company without clear substitutes."
Or one that bases its work on Google-controlled code.
Or one that doesn't support Linux as an OS option.
>"Recently the Browser Company (the startup behind the Arc web browser) switched over to building a new AI-powered browser"
No thanks. Last thing I want is an "AI infected" browser.
>The Chromium-based browser has
DOUBLE no thanks. Not giving any mind-share or power-share over the hundreds of machines I oversee to Google.
>[per wikipedia] for macOS and is also available for [MS-]Windows, iOS and Android. "
So not even Linux support. So I guess that is TRIPLE no thanks.
>"According to LAPD Officer Chris Miller, at least three suspects were apprehended in connection to the Apple Store burglary. One woman was arrested on the spot, while two others were detained for looting."
And will any of them actually be prosecuted and punished? Or will officials make all kinds of nonsense excuses for them?
That's probably because you didn't bring your collie fursuit this time because you wanted to show him that you're a rebel.
Please don't think of me when you fap again
Together with robotic automation, there is really no need for human supervision in half the jobs, if not more.
DROP YOUR WEAPON, YOU HAVE TEN SECONDS TO COMPLY
So, no idea why you think Apple fucked up, when they invent a faster disk image?
I want to know how they fucked up with the first disk image. That's why you have no idea why I would want to know something I didn't want to know.
So if you think something was fucked up before, perhaps point out what it was?
It was obvious to everyone else. This is a you problem.
"There are plenty of places trying"
It cannot be "plenty" when 1.5 C is now a foregone conclusion.
The summary is hilariously ironic:
This was the approach IBM focused on initially, but the company eventually realized that creating the hardware to support it was an "engineering pipe dream"
And then later:
"We feel confident it is now a question of engineering to build these machines, rather than science."
"Cracked the code" might be overselling it a bit at this point, I would say.
When your head is firmly buried in the sand, it may look like that.
The volatile pricing of inference is correctly seen as hard to plan for, which simply means that inference providers will start offering more rate limited flat-fee options and other pricing models that are attractive to customers who need the predictability. This is nothing special (cloud computing has had similar issues and solutions for years) and definitely not evidence for "OMG AI IS HYPE YOU IDIOTS" with which you so consistently pollute Slashdot.
Why is this posted AGAIN. It was just posted yesterday:
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F...
I even replied:
https://f6ffb3fa-34ce-43c1-939d-77e64deb3c0c.atarimworker.io/comments....
I never used the original Wordperfect, I was only near people who were using it, but by the time I wanted to do any word processing at all I had an Amiga. And while I still had it, Workbench 2 came out, and brought scalable fonts along with it.
Of all the DTP software of any description, I align myself with PageMaker -> InDesign. I have used a number of packages and still go back to Adobe when I want to do some layout and typesetting. I go back to before they required a sub, though. My experience with it also goes back to Aldus. I've tried Quark, and yuck, they never did get the UI figured out worth half a shit compared to Adobe... or even Aldus.
That goes for anything you can't eat, live in, or fuck.
Pokemon may be a fad, but it's been incredibly durable.
And from this follows: there is a ton of ways one could fuck up performance with a shoddily implemented custom file system for a particular disk image format.
I only know a little bit about filesystems (I haven't dug into any deeply since using fsdb on SCO Unix) but even I know that. I want to know, in what particular way did Apple fuck up?
There Aren't Enough Cables To Meet Growing Electricity Demand [...] The International Energy Agency estimates that 80 million kilometers of grid infrastructure must be built between now and 2040 to meet clean energy targets
I'm failing to see the relevance of the text to the headline. As if we were going to meet clean energy targets? As if we were trying?
They will have to, they cannot stop the industry going to downloads. This is the smartest thing they could do.
It's very interesting that game shops were mostly replaced by video game shops which now need to become game shops again.
One small step for man, one giant stumble for mankind.
