Don't argue with that fuckwit. Malcontents like rsilvergun are perpetually enraged by the existence of Amish and other such faith communities that fail to fail.

Yes, you are correct: they are growing steadily, snapping up affordable land when large chunks of contiguous property becomes available. They prefer land that has low value to conventional agrarians; northern state rural property, where winter provides free refrigeration for slaughter. A bonus when it has tracts of hardwood lumber, which they clear (by hand) and use for high quality furniture products.

And the food is crazy. They eat like 19th century landed aristocracy.

No, Doxygen support only determines which languages aren't acceptable.

Actually, a good documentation program that can generate static html pages, is easy to use, doesn't take up too much vertical space, and a few other requirements it the criterion, but basically that's Doxygen or Javadoc, and I don't like Java. ... Well, actually one of the requirements is the same documentation system needs to work on all the programs in the project.

E.g. Markdown takes up too much vertical space. (The requirement for blank lines.) That means that when I'm editing I can't see both the documentation and the cpde.

Sure. Go have that squabble with someone else. I had nothing to say about whether or not Commonwealth Fusion will ever make an erg of commercial electricity. My comment is limited to the novel design of their toroid.

Whether the language is mainstream or not isn't one of my considerations. What libraries are available, of course, is related to that, and that *is* one of my considerations.

Python is fine when the application is I/O bound anyway.

How have the Amish survived your theory?

I do doubt the even medium term viability of a tech bro utopia, however. Without outside consequences, 95% of the members would end up in dungeon.

The article may have, but the summary did not. I just checked again to be sure. "Gray matter" is too vague a term to tie it to specific functions.

There is "no safe quantity" of air to breathe.
Every breath contains cancer-causing oxygen, radioactive particles, and maybe asbestos fibres. There is no threshold - at least no known one.

In plain English, "safe" means low risk. And your theoretically non-zero but immeasurably low risk still counts as safe. You are using technical terms to scare and deceive. Why? How does it make you feel?

An interesting selection of langauges. I, personally, switch between C++, Python, and D, depending on what I'm doing. I find all of the ones you selected ... umm ... less suitable. I'd be interested in Go if Doxygen could handle it. Similarly for Ruby. Both have cases where they would be the better choice, but documentation of my work says to avoid them. (And Sphinx is lousy, but since Doxygen handles Python I don't need to deal with it.)

He said it would have taken about 5 minutes in C, so I think you're right.

They can't make the more general claim, because they only tested one scent. The summary also didn't say which gray matter increased, perhaps it was the olfactory cortex.

You're being silly. Yes, there are lots of instances of the police being trigger happy, and that's a real problem that should have consequences...but...the swatters are the problem here.

It's not clear how the system could be redesigned to serve the needed purpose, but also not allow malicious individuals to abuse it. Being able to trace calls to the emergency system, though, would seem to be a step in the right direction.

What proportion of those who are potential customers are on each of those sites?

It really shouldn't be your only internet presence, you should have your own web site, that's linked to by various social media, but the relative importance of the different social media is "What proportion customers are on *that* site?".

It sounds like you don't know what the technical meaning of "no safe quantity" is. If you did, you'd be aware that your audience does not, and would avoid it. What do you even think "safe" means?

Here is an example: there is no "safe amount of time" you can walk outdoors without possibly being struck by a meteorite. Even a walk to the mailbox, it is possible to be hit by an asteroid. Understand? The risk is proportional to time outdoors

But in toxicology, a "safe quantity" means a known amount, below which there is zero risk. The amount of the toxin must reach a threshold before any harm is possible.

So even if there is "no safe quanity" scary words used, the actual risk may be a tiny fraction of trivial. Please stop bullshitting people with technically true, but misleading words. Oh, it's your hobby?

I'm not sure I'd trust a chart which claims over 5% of Filipinos were stabbed to death in 2021.
Other data are off by only two orders of magnitude.

I suspect it's a poorly written description. From reading the article I believe that the light is transiting through the "crystal", and being continually replaced by the lasers that are necessary. I'm not really sure, because the description was so poorly written...or rather written to be exciting rather than descriptive.