Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Now watch the ideological capture of /. (Score 1) 34

1000% agree. I don't know if you expected I'd disagree, but absolutely: the idea of a $100 million plane (and what they don't tell you is that the quote to allies is +$400 million in life costs for the plane's operational span - this is a $half BILLION plane).

You could FILL THE SKY with crazy awesome drones and deploy a "can't miss" directed-energy weapon AA defense system for the cost of 1 stupid F35.

DoD exactly like NASA: the government needs to aggressively prune these programs.
We are $37 BILLION in debt.

Comment No substitute for a real test (Score 1, Troll) 160

Amen, I did the same; WTF am I going to do about a lost child or Alzheimer patient 20 miles away at 3am? And then "wind advisories" did similar: it's always windy here, tell us when it's NOT windy.

They need level threshold: those who want only "major" issues should be able to shut off small potato alerts. Unless Dorothy has an 80% of flying by, I don't want a wind advisory.

That being said, major-event alarms need to be tested at least yearly using our actual phones. There is no substitute for live testing.

Comment Now watch the ideological capture of /. (Score 1, Interesting) 34

There will be a wave of posts about how these Brave Senators are fighting the Nasty Orange Fascist Tyrant and his anti-Science agenda(tm).

When in fact, let's be clear:
- SLS is an hilariously borderline disaster. Behind by years, $billions beyond budget, tests constantly fail. And it basically doesn't work.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaseyhandmer.wordpress...
- Should we talk about how their original mandate was more or less just to REbuild the Saturn V/Apollo a little bigger with modern materials? You know, that system that had 17 launches with only one launch system (sort of) failure (Apollo 13) MORE THAN 50 years ago? The system that was largely designed by engineers, whose "computers" were 6-7 orders of magnitude less capable than the smartphone in your pocket? Does it help the argument to point out that NASA is basically trying to rebuild something their fathers built, this time with astonishing developments in CAD/CAM, design, and almost-magical accomplishments in material science...and we still haven't even gotten a working fucking SPACESUIT yet?
- Destin @ SmarterEveryDay is about as proNASA as they can be, it's in his blood, and he *tried* in the most polite way possible to tell them "look, we all know this is a mess, nobody's even done the basic math on some CRITICAL program items for Artemis and...nobody's talking about it" It's a good video, and a good talk from someone who is genuinely sympathetic to the engineers in that room.
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3F... ...(crickets)
- Yes, some of these senators (mostly the Democrats, but there are neverTrumper GOPs that will pretend righteousness) will themselves claim this as a Pro Science Crusade. Maybe it is, sure, whatever. But what these senators are MOSTLY fighting for is their piece of the $50 BILLION spent in their states that's been spent so far with no real sign of completion. That's serious gravy-train money even in Senatorial scales.

NASA (& JPL) is an amazing organization. It really IS rocket science. They have made some astonishing accomplishments, even in recent years, such as JWST and Martian probes that run nearly forever. They are, bar none, the pre-eminent space exploration organization on earth.
To be clear, I'm not peddling an alternative - there is no easy answer now.
I'm fine with Musk constantly blowing up spaceships, it's his $, but NASA is supposed to be good at this. Frankly, I'd rather we have a government space program *AND* private-industry space programs, both!

Nevertheless, at some point *someone* in charge has to have the nuts to confront NASA when a program is a mess and DEMAND they either fix it or kill it. It can't just go on hemorrhaging money for nothing in return.

Comment Re:Or maybe we just donâ(TM)t care? (Score 0) 196

Canadians are keeping our money at home. Shop local. And why is one online companyâ(TM)s big sale news anyway? Maybe we just have all the crap we need and spending money like this just because thereâ(TM)s a sale is an out of date trend. Save money for rent and groceries. And get rid of that twit running your country thatâ(TM)s messing up your economy and pissing off your neighbours at the same time.

And yet, there you are, buying products of that country, and using it to post spittle to Slashdot.

Comment Parts more interesting than the whole (Score 1) 63

I am more interested in the parts list. For instance they seem to be using a mini motion table using linear actuators -- like the ones aircraft training simulators use -- as the base of the robot's neck. This is great at their price point. This could be used in a driving simulator or for industrial testing.

Any idea about their bill of material? And how to source parts they use?

Comment Details matter (Score 1) 179

Turcios is now known for being able to build anything quickly. Businesses reach out to him to contract out projects that would take software engineering teams weeks -- and he delivers in hours.

Are these just demos & one-time conversion utilities, or real software (not full of bugs)? I'm skeptical it's the latter. AI ain't there...yet.

There is a market for demos & one-time conversion utilities.

Slashdot Top Deals

"You tweachewous miscweant!" -- Elmer Fudd

Working...