The bigger problem is that OpenAI didn't actually log what the agents did so we only know this because the victims spoke up. It wasn't just Hugging Face, but various oldschool wikis in Germany, The University of Toronto and others who were accessed.

I don't know how they sandboxed the AIs but it didn't seem to do a good job if it iddn't log what sites it was using and Hugging Face was the one who detected the hack.

Yeah, it turns out that actually IS what Claude told him to put into the comment. He's literally using it to write a shitty browser and AND to write shitty comments. What a failed human.

The fact is that she was arrested for making credible threats in the context of a managed and monitored service, proving that she is an idiot at best, and therefore potentially stupid enough to follow through on such a threat. This is what responsibility looks like all around, which is the only reason it's news.

They get real upset when your phone lens is sticking out of your breast pocket in strip clubs. I don't know why... (Honestly, I wasn't recording, I just didn't feel like sitting on my phone.)

Audio recording without consent is already illegal under the wiretap laws in most states. The weird thing is that video recording without consent isn't!

I just wish that somebody, somewhere, would masturbate to pictures of me... sigh.

And smart glasses just make an already punchable face 100 times more punchable!

The difference is that when someone points a cellphone lens at you, you know they are recording you, and that the best response is to silently turn around and walk away. Surreptitious recording is done without consent or the victim's knowledge. That being said, it might be a good idea to record consent before sex, and for girls at frat parties to wear smart glasses to prove there was no consent.

"No was was harmed, no one was threatened, nothing happened.
This is some crazy big brother shit that should not happen"

Are you on the bad drugs? You just said nothing happened, then you said it shouldn't have happened. Well, it didn't. Why aren't you happy?

Yes, they are both bad and addictive.

Never too soon to point out that someone who doesn't respect choices in one area surely doesn't respect them in others.

Try learning to read. There were important parts in there you missed.

Use your phone in your breast pocket like normal creeps.
Better resolution too.

They aren't writing it, Claude is.

The AI isn't thinking. It's just predicting what looks most like it fits, when the choice is diddled with random numbers. That's the difference: humans are doing something more profound than rolling a die to decide which of the possible next things should actually come next.