Comment Re:Do we know the geographical source? (Score 1) 25
Hell of an example to educate the truly weak-minded in society on what an actual hostile work environment looks like.
Are you an LLM trained on the political cartoons in The Onion?
Hell of an example to educate the truly weak-minded in society on what an actual hostile work environment looks like.
Are you an LLM trained on the political cartoons in The Onion?
They're not going to buy a weird brand. That's way too exploratory.
And I won't buy a Bezos brand.
I won't buy American any more either, though. I'm over that shit. American automakers can't make a car worth a fuck, period.
maybe bacteriophage (viruses that target bacteria) are the immerging technology. They are also useful in therapy for certain kinds of cancer.
Yeah, but it costs tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars and weeks of study to do that. You have to study which phage will work before it's deployed, and this is inherently expensive and time consuming. It will presumably get cheaper, but it probably can't get much faster.
LOL America sold it to the Allies you idiot.
America factually sold war supplies including fuel and metals to the Axis. As a Nazi, you should know this and be thankful.
They will continue to use physics simulation and rendering which are actually correct, not just correct-ish-looking.
There is no such thing. The only actually correct thing is the real world. Everything else is an approximation, and this is one of them. There are plenty of minor players who will pay for cheaper training. It certainly doesn't matter to Google whether it will produce good results. Arguably no approach will, so why not just use this?
You can relay DHCP.
Netbooting desktops is one of those ideas that sounds great and then isn't. The HDD isn't that expensive. AFAICT nobody does it except for clusters and POS which is worthless without the network anyway. Plus it's an opportunity for an attacker on your network to get your machine to boot another system so they get access to a whitelisted MAC.
Then the ballot gets checked against a list of voters, they're not on it, and it gets thrown away.
Now shut the fuck up or I'm going to go donate more money to Wild Hornets so they can buy more drones so they can blow up the Yandex facility "you" "live" in
Thinking you're better than other people because you bring home more money is only one of the many reasons why you're a little bitch.
If you were smart enough to know that filtering doesn't have to be all encompassing we might believe you actually do the things you claim you do for a living.
But no one does.
Blackout protection is not the main reason to do this. The main reason to do this is arbitrage. And it would take you only seconds to do the maths and realise that arbitrage requires bugger-all extra strain on the battery, a few cycles a year at most. 70 or 80kWh battery vs maybe 4 or 5kWh of draw per day in the summer and as high at 8 or 9 in the winter.
I agree with this. I've looked quite often at domestic battery setups, and they're really poor value at the moment, at least in the UK. And I've also looked at getting a bidirectional charger that can support V2H if my next car offered it... and again, they're really poor value at the moment, at least in the UK. I really would want to be able to swap out my now decade-old home charger with a new model that offers simple seamless bidirectionality and works with any car offering V2H. But at the moment, this isn't a simple packaged offer for consumers, it's a project, requiring navigating all sorts of regulations, specialists etc. I feel like it ought to be doable for a couple of grand, but last I looked, it was at least 6 or 7k. V frustrating.
Making a distinction is unproductive at this point.
It's productive in the sense that it brings clarity to what the fuck one is talking about, instead of leaving people to wonder. Your observation is well-made, however.
straw man central. You'd think bots wouldn't be so stupid.
Well, if they're trained on average forum users...
Of course it's a POS, it's a Ford. But I'm not mad at the Maverick for having the form factor that it has, I just don't think it's a truck by any reasonable definition any more than a RAV4 or CR-V is a SUV. If it's based on a car platform, it's a car.
Ironically for this whole conversation I think most people who buy full frame pickups would be better off with something else, Most pickups will never tow and most 4WD pickups will never go off-road, at least not under the original owners. But I also think that there's a real market for a full frame EV pickup, and it would sell both to people who should and shouldn't buy it based on how they actually use the vehicle.
Nope. It's just not what I am interested in, and also, there's a whole bunch of old guys who have been asking for a simple electric pickup with this kind of functionality. Older than me, I mean. I've talked to them about it when I worked at the RV shop, it came up surprisingly often. There's a market for an old school sized small EV pickup, but it has to be full frame. Just make the frame wider and put a battery between the rails, FFS. It can have IRS or a live axle, it doesn't matter because a smaller pickup doesn't get so crashy. Put a double wishbone in the front and it will handle fine.
I am not against any kind of car existing, and I think most pickup buyers would be better of with minivans. I just know that the market has been ignoring this not very profitable per unit segment for obvious reasons, but would like to see it explored. I, too, am interested in that type of vehicle. But it's hard to get a car company excited about making a vehicle which is maintainable. Ford fucked up big time in the eighties and came up with a pickup and engine that would last for decades, and they haven't wanted to repeat that mistake. (F-150 with a 300 and a 5 speed, ofc.)
Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future. - Niels Bohr