Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Seen a lot ot it after COVID (Score 1) 151

I don't know if this would be called theater, but in my case, I decorated my masks. I'd take a sharpie and draw teeth, sometimes shark teeth, sometimes rotten teeth, sometimes The Rolling Stones lips and tongue logo, I had fun with it.

Indeed! I saw plenty of skeletal jaw/teeth masks, floral prints, don't remember seeing the rolling stones one, but wouldn't have minded one bit.

I wear print T-shirts all the time, so why not?

Just don't go with the heavy iron-on type decals if they're too big, stick more to tie-die jobs that still let the fabric breath. You are trying to suck air through it.

Comment Re: Seen a lot ot it after COVID (Score 1) 151

Many of the people religiously wearing masks during the pandemic honestly believed that wearing a mask would keep them from contracting COVID rather than preventing them from spreading if if they were contagious.

You know, this is almost like one of those equations where you have a factor, but as you work through it, the factor is neutralized, turning out to not matter in the end?

Remember how I said "If getting non-infected people to wear masks despite the minimal benefits gets the infected to, it is worth it."

I mean, if them wearing masks makes the potentially infected maskless uncomfortable to the point that they put on the mask, then wearing it is actually still protecting them, just from secondary effects.

Plus, while the effects are minimal for a cheap reusable mask compared to a N95, they still protect the wearers some.

Everybody wearing their masks thus does indeed reduce the chances of them getting COVID.

I'm still going to disagree - masks helped reduce the spread. That's very much public health, because public health worries less about the individual and more the group, the "public" part. Fewer people infected is good, thus not theater.

Theater was things like the people wearing masks with holes cut in them.

Comment Re: Seen a lot ot it after COVID (Score 1) 151

From a public health standpoint, keeping asymptomatic carriers from infecting others is very much NOT theater. Anything that reduces the infection or spread rate is an effective control. Whether it is cost effective is a different matter, but cloth masks are cheap.
If getting non-infected people to wear masks despite the minimal benefits gets the infected to, it is worth it.
And COVID doesn't have spores.

Comment Re: Seen a lot ot it after COVID (Score 1) 151

We don't 'spin' scientific stuff as a certainty without decades or even centuries of work. We can be very highly expectant, but we have those 95 and 99% certainty bars for a reason.
If you took it as a certainty, that is on you and not the scientists. Best we had was "by what we know right now" and that changed over time with both knowledge and supply availability.
And things like wearing masks was a public health issue. It is like forcing you to have liability insurance to drive, to protect others. Why? The cloth masks didn't really protect you from being infected if you wandered around infected people without masks, but if an infected person wore a mask it really reduced the rate of them infecting others.

(And autocorrupt tried to change with into without. Why?)

Comment Seen a lot ot it after COVID (Score 4, Insightful) 151

Makes sense to me, I've seen a lot of people distrusting all the COVID science, mostly by making statements like 'They said the vaccine would protect us!', implying that 'Science' told them that it would be 100% effective with 0% chance of side effects.
When more realistically it'd produce something like "vaccine reduced infections by 95%(+-2%, 95% certainty) in the test group 8 weeks after dosage."
Then pile on literally hundreds of studies looking at various other aspects and sub groups.

Comment Re:Yes, but ... (Score 2) 34

I'd imagine that they aren't turning off all the lights on the truck, so somebody looking should easily see it coming from more than 450 meters away, because the distance to SEE a light emitting object is drastically further than the distance you can see non-emitting objects illuminated by light you're emitting yourself.
Looking, the trucks seem to have all the standard lights.

Comment Re:True genius is to replace gas pumps, slowly. (Score 1) 101

When the other side does not understand a topic or concept, your solution is?

Explain it. Especially don't give reading assignments that don't actually address what you're talking about.

Apparently not given the constant misunderstanding of what puts different individuals in different segments.

That's the problem. I DO understand. You haven't tweaked me properly apparently to make me state it. Your explanation of segments is very lacking.

I mean, this all started with me merely disagreeing that gas stations are a 1:1 swap, and I think even you've come to the conclusion that that's correct. I'd never dispute that a lot of gas station locations would be good EV charging locations as well.

Consider that I've stated a number of differences that I see for market segmentation - there's all sorts of different models possible with charging that wasn't possible, or at least practical, with gasoline.

Nope, I said "The wiring may be for lighting". At one apartment complex that I lived at we have covered parking for the spaces reserved for a particular apartment. These had some lights. And an occasional 120V outlet you could reach with an extension cord. If these had been lights only then perhaps a lighter weight wiring for lamps could have been used, but given the 120V 15A standard outlets its a pretty safe bet 14AWG was used. Or 12AWG if they were worried too many people might be plugging something in at the same time, or if the run was long. Not sure were the electrical box for the cover was.

It's nearly 100% certain it's 12 gauge wiring on a 20A circuit.
The presence of 15A outlets doesn't actually mean much, all 15A convenience outlets are actually rated for 20A as well.
I can never say it never happens, because, well, my brother's an electrician and the stuff he regularly finds...

There is 240V line after the breaker box. Which is where a charger would appear. And the ability to wire up a new 240V circuit at the breaker box depends on what service ran into you condo/apartment/etc.

Any condo or apartment would normally be better off running a circuit from basically the service entrance, not individual apartments. Now, "Apartments" covers a lot, from the converted house I once lived in for a bit, to skyscrapers, to even almost converted hotels with parking out front.

Yes, and in my old apartment parking with lights and 15A outlets there is a single hot. So you can't just put in a new double pole 30A breaker in the box.

Well, there you'd obviously want to pull new wire, but that isn't actually normally all that big of a deal. If you want multiple charging spots, which you probably should for an apartment, it becomes a bigger deal, but it also becomes a question of attracting tenants at some point.

That said, I think you've misunderstood something from your own link. "Innovators" and "Early Adopters" add up to 16% of the market. We're currently at ~7.4% of new cars sold being EVs, of cars on the road, only 1.4% are EV. So we're very much still in the "early adopter" stage, though the percentages can easily vary. I think that my estimates will hold well into "Early Majority", depending on how you look at it, with the number of EVs sold hitting 50%, or cars on the road reaching 50% roughly a decade after that.
If EVs want to continue taking over from ICE, of course infrastructure will need to expand to support them, from charging points to the very grid. AI is currently stressing the grid more, crazily enough, and EVs represent a massive opportunity for load shifting, so the naysayers saying the grid can't handle the extra load are very mistaken, but more generation will be needed, and if it ends up being mostly solar, it could become more beneficial to charge during the day, on average, which means encouraging work centers to install chargers.

Seen them, NeoCharge. New wiring is often a better option, more amps, faster charge. Still, way better than 120V.

Remember how we were talking about different market segments needing different solutions, different price points and such? It's an option, especially where somebody doesn't need the extra amps, like a limited commute, retiree, and such, and where either the service or wiring would be prohibitive.

Remember, circumstances vary. Folks with a garage and with a 240V dryer outlet might be in the early majority segment that follows the early adopters.

And what do you think I was talking about? You finally said what I was trying to get at - the laggards are, besides those just too conservative to change (like my mom still having a home phone), the ones who are going to have the most complex and expensive times switching. The late majority can be those where it's just a touch more complex and therefore expensive, needing some technology development to be truly superior to ICE. The apartment dwellers and such. But we have some adoption even in the early innovation zone, seeing chargers installed at some buildings. It'll spread.

Comment Re:What if there isn't enough passengers? (Score 1) 107

The real question then would be whether or not the tunnel full of Teslas could move a significant number of that rush. If it can, no problem.

If not, TWO tunnels would pretty much double capacity, still probably be cheaper, the Teslas could theoretically be Taxis when not used for tunnel stuff, while still being cheaper than actual subways in the USA (our procurement for them being utterly broken).

Comment Re:What if there isn't enough passengers? (Score 1) 107

That they don't build buses NOW does not mean that they can't in the future. I've seen some concept art and preliminary design work. Basically specification stage stuff, but it's very doable.

And yes, they'd need to be custom to fit in the current tunnels, but that's why I said putting them on top of a Tesla sled.

The trade war in China is indeed a factor, so no BYD, so Tesla is the nearest option.

It wasn't just the Orange man saying China bad. Biden started with the tariffs on EVs with them.

Comment Re:End of Intellectual Property a Good Thing (Score 1) 140

To me, the future is kind of 'scary' in this way: we will all become consumers. There won't be any outstanding people, who have a trait that many people adore. There will be no Humphrey Bogart, nor a Michael Jackson. There will just be AI's cranking out material, and the top 0.1% of randomly generated "art" will be appreciated. Somehow, it "feels" de-humanizing

I dunno...I mean, AI can't perform a live concert....unless everyone gives up on going to see live performances ,...music from people won't die...

Slashdot Top Deals

Money is truthful. If a man speaks of his honor, make him pay cash. -- Lazarus Long

Working...