Comment Re: A mouse model? (Score 1) 186
Just how many innocent mice were killed and autopsied for this "research", just so wags could make jokes on social media?
What are "wags"?
Just how many innocent mice were killed and autopsied for this "research", just so wags could make jokes on social media?
What are "wags"?
They did this by restricting new house building to push the value of their homes up.
I don't get this where you and other post this......I see new houses and neighborhoods being built up ALL over the places I live and visit here in the US.
There is a fuck ton of land around and people are building houses in masses.....
the US is HUGE...maybe you need to get out a bit and travel outside your 20 mile circle you currently burrow down into.....?
just remember that fully one third of Americans do not have a license,
I have to seriously question this stat you put up....especially if you are talking about real American Citizens....
But even so, not having a license doesn't necessarily keep one from driving....
We have a LOT of folks in the US without a lot of proper documentation or licensing driving around these days....
This is a guess but it's based on how people were when I was in college. The market for these would be people who occasionally need a car for something where they cannot borrow one or where they cannot get a friend to provide a lift.
Strange...everyone I knew HAD their own cars in college.....??
I'm talking very much low to middle middle class folks.....and this was decades back too....
Which is why it is a priority for Republicans to lock in long term bans on regulation of AI. Damaging society has become their highest priority, almost as if they are controlled by our primary adversary.
You can't seriously , actually believe this....can you????
If so, you might wanna quit talking to the bot(s)....go outside and get some fresh air....log off awhile, get away from the TV and your echo chamber....
"Companies have one job in a capitalism - make money. Thatâ(TM)s their *only* societal responsibility..." This is false, it is merely a claim made by sociopaths. A companies "job" is to perform in the way its owners desire, in the past there were differing goals that companies would have (and that's still true of smaller companies). The "make money at any cost" approach comes from Wall Street, not capitalism, it is human nature.
With most any company of any decent size, the "owners" are the stockholders.
And with stockholders....pretty much the sole obligation the people working the company for the stockholders is to make money for the stockholders.
I mean, that's pretty much the ONLY reason anyone buys stock in a company.....why else would they do so if not to make a profit?
That's why I would never lock myself into a limited smart tv. Id rather grab an old laptop and use that.
Or just get a streaming "box" like FireTV or AppleTV....those generally seem work fine, have a remote and an easy to use interface.
I'll stick with them, as long as they aren't that iPhone17 orange abomination.
I'm with you on this one....WTF was up with that orange color???
That AND...no Space Grey or Black?!?!
That's pretty much one of the only things keeping me from upgrading my 12 pro max to the 17 pro max.
I'm hoping in a few months maybe they'll offer better colors....?
I tend to buy top of the line loaded ones....I'm currently on the iPHone 12 Max Pro...loaded storage available at the time...I think 1 TB?
Before that I had the iPhone 6 Plus (did they have a pro?)....and IPhone 3GS before that....
Right now, not seriously in the market....my phone still had plenty of space on it, runs as fast as I need, I don't see any speed or battery degradation on it yet.
I will admit I'm looking at the 17's camera and ability to shoot RAW video...that is starting to tempt me.
I guess my phones are not well over $1K, I generally just put it on Apple Pay, get my 3% cash back and pay it off interest free over 12 months.
I have the cash, but figure why not use "free money" if given the opportunity, eh? I keep may cash for it in an interest bearing account or invested, etc...
I frankly don't give a fuck what anyone thinks of my phone, if they think anything at all.
As I'd written earlier, I think in the US, phones are such a commodity, no one looks at them as any sort of status symbol and hasn't for a long time now...
In fact you HAVE to use external storage if you want to shoot video in RAW format.....
HTH.
Really? I would expect the opposite.
- Owners of flagship devices concerned with their image and having the latest tech would be more likely to replace devices more often to get access to the latest gear, perhaps handing the old device down to a spouse or child if they aren't getting a trade-in credi
I can't speak for places outside the US, but here....the cell phone has become some a commodity that no one here really uses or sees any of the phones as a "status symbol"....
No one pays attention to what phone you have....at least not in most of the US.
Maybe remove tariffs and have more good paying jobs, then Americans will be excited about buying a new phone, new laptop, and new car.
How about in parallel to tarrifs we have federal incentives (maybe from tariff revenues) to help businesses set up and manufacture back in the US again,with US workers with good paying jobs?
Kill two birds with one stone.....
May I ask why the fuck you seem to give as much of a damn as you do on how we live our lives here in the US?
And yes if we want things we get them.....CA wanted something...BUT they apparently didn't want it enough to secure the rights and to properly guard against overspending, etc. It looks to me that the politicians in CA wanted a boondoggle to funnel money from the public coffers more than they wanted a high speed rail system.
But that latter part is just my opinion.
But again....why are you so hyperbolic about how the US does things if you're not over here and part of us?
Live your own life...we really don't give a fuck how you want to do it....just leave us alone, you know?
It doesn't. What it means is cutting through a lot of big parcels whose owners have big money, so they can be big impediments. There has to be a happier medium than this between respect for individual private property ownership and the needs of the many, but we are clearly uninterested in finding it in this country.
The greater good...for who?
I mean, in an example....high speed rail from NYC to LA.
I don't know exactly which states they'd pass through, but let's just pick Iowa for shits and giggles.
Now...to keep things "high speed" that means you're NOT going to be stopping much at all between the two end points.
So, this would benefit people in CA and NY, but it gives NO benefit to people in Iowa who would have cities, farmland,all sorts of private properly they'd have to give up for the system.
Why the fuck would anyone in Iowa vote to give things up for this rail system they do not benefit from and actually gain hassle from...?
"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai