No you must read cited sources rather than bullshitting because you think someone doesn't like your idol.

It's clear you actually have nothing of value to add. Goodbye.

Nope, it has nothing to do with it as he is literally not being charged with a crime related to a border search. That's not the article the prosecution went with. When you search without warrant or without cause you're not in the process of taking lawful possession of anything. This isn't my view here, this is the prosecution. They themselves are declaring it has nothing to do with it.

The part of the section you are ignoring is that of taking lawful possession. But I'll throw you a bone here, let's assume the government did follow a specific process to lawfully possess specific data, let's make that up and move on to:

This will be an interesting test case for this law, because as far as anyone is concerned he didn't do *anything*. He wasn't even in possession or control of the device at the time. And before you come up with some bullet proof case for him to be found guilty, note that actual lawyers, legal professionals, have opined on this and all have concluded it is the greyest of grey areas with no clear indication of where this can go, and have also concluded this kind of case could make it up to the supreme court as a result.

Do you want to share your legal qualifications and write 20 pages of justification for why you think you are right? If so, I'm all ears (well... eyes, unless you have a legal blog or something).

This is an interesting case, and everyone with a law degree seems to agree the government will have an insanely difficult case to prove that the statute applies, and then an even harder case to prove that he violated it.

I'm sure you're right, but when? The vikings conquered it at one point. The Mongols demanded tribute from parts, and conquered other parts. At one point Lithuania held at least the Ukraine. Most modern states don't really have a long history. I think there was a period where Poland was the aggressive empire. Saying "throughout history" is just wrong.

It existed in 1950. Many people living in it wished it didn't exist, but it did.

It has been at very high cost to Ukraine. But perhaps they don't want to be eaten piece by piece by Russia.

I think you're wrong about the "throughout history". The Mongols and the Huns were not Russians. IIRC, Russia has been invaded more often than it has been the invader. If you'd said "since 1900", or "since 1850" you might have a point (though I'd need to check).

There are direct replacements for diesel and gasoline which we know how to make and which we absolutely could use to replace our transportation fuels without switching to EVs. And you can just read about them on the Internet, they are not secret.

If you don't care enough about a subject to learn about it then don't make declarative statements about it.

Absurd generalizations? Wut?

On what basis? It's unquestionable that the political left in the US has both:
- fought nuclear tooth and nail since the 1970s
- is clearly the most concerned (panty-wetting fear in other words) with climate change.

There is no sane person that can dispute those assertions, gaslighter.

"ignoring the fact that your tech isn't actually the only fossil fuel alternative out there" I said LITERALLY NOTHING about that. Nothing. Are you asserting that expanded nuclear WOULDN'T have reduced hydrocarbon emissions substantially, or... are you just afraid to admit that?

I think wind and solar are great; they weren't meaningfully part of the conversation 45 years ago, which is what I rather specifically referenced.

I feel like you might not be getting enough oxygen. I made a single irrefutable assertion and you go off on irrelevancies as if they matter.

From what I can see optimum has replaced the coax coming into my home at least twice before I moved in. It was good enough that they didn't have to do it again for me.

I'll agree that is sure didn't make things better, but those are temporary changes, and, e.g., EVs still have the problem of how to charge them if you don't have a garage...which LOTS of people don't. That really needs to be solved.

It's hard to find any good thing to say about Trump, but this was already a problem, and he didn't make it much worse. Blame him for other things. You won't need to look very hard.

list games.

Hahahhahahaahahhhaa

Suck harder, comrade. Putin will give you your reward any day now.

Fuck you, orc apologist.

They didn't create NATO because Russians were nice guys.

They did it because Russia has been the aggressor again and again throughout history.

If they would just stop invading neighbors there wouldn't even need to be a NATO.

Yeah no shit it does surprising things, it's using random numbers you fucknut.