Submission + - Wikipedia and wokism is under attack (msn.com) 3
An anonymous reader writes: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com%2Fen-us%2Fpoli...
For many people who have tried to participate in Wikipedia it has been long known to be run by a select few "volunteers" who has a mangle of rules and commitees that make it impossible for regular people, or even professionals in the area of expertise, to make an impact.
This has left it as a tool for select publicity hounds, and an echo chanber for a small segment of deveoped activists (Who Jimmy caled is nice nerds). One thing that will never get into wikipedea is the truth of any contraversal topic, or any comments against a well fundered interest.
At one point, for example, it was decided that every biography had to has a section on with idle speculation of the homosexual proclivities of every and any historical figure. Objecting to a section on Goerge Washington's, William Shaskepears, or King Alfred's sexual preferences would be relentlessly attacked.
And so it goes with many aspects of Wikipedea. Waves of political activism swap its pages.
Now the conservative right is taking aim at the process. They rightfully point out that opinions and interests that hold sway over the project distorts of any real truth. Just compare it to a real encylopedia with professional editors. It is no surprise that we have reached this point. Oversite of Wikipedea is long in coming.
For many people who have tried to participate in Wikipedia it has been long known to be run by a select few "volunteers" who has a mangle of rules and commitees that make it impossible for regular people, or even professionals in the area of expertise, to make an impact.
This has left it as a tool for select publicity hounds, and an echo chanber for a small segment of deveoped activists (Who Jimmy caled is nice nerds). One thing that will never get into wikipedea is the truth of any contraversal topic, or any comments against a well fundered interest.
At one point, for example, it was decided that every biography had to has a section on with idle speculation of the homosexual proclivities of every and any historical figure. Objecting to a section on Goerge Washington's, William Shaskepears, or King Alfred's sexual preferences would be relentlessly attacked.
And so it goes with many aspects of Wikipedea. Waves of political activism swap its pages.
Now the conservative right is taking aim at the process. They rightfully point out that opinions and interests that hold sway over the project distorts of any real truth. Just compare it to a real encylopedia with professional editors. It is no surprise that we have reached this point. Oversite of Wikipedea is long in coming.