Conversations, you see, have this thing called context.
Parent said the following:
The problem that people don't realize is that democracy was never about voting every four or so years, like Russia, but about citizen participation with a legal system that treats every citizen the same. Just the fact that the president can pardon and is not held to the same laws as citizens confirms that the US not a democracy.
The implication here, is that "it's not voting that makes a democracy" (partially correct).
I replied with:
Democracy is absolutely about voting every 4 years- and unlike Russia- having that vote actually counted, and given not under duress.
Filling in the gap in their original assertion to make their statement true, rather than false.
The 4 years came from them, but it wasn't really important- they were just picking a random interval, and I used their random interval.
The conversation was really about whether or not voting constitutes a democracy, or, if as they claim, Democracy is defined by these frankly strange boundary conditions:
but about citizen participation with a legal system that treats every citizen the same. Just the fact that the president can pardon and is not held to the same laws as citizens confirms that the US not a democracy.