Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
User Journal

Journal smittyoneeach's Journal: d_r's really not trying hard enough 31

Journal by smittyoneeach
Smitty's new / old conspiracy of the week! just isn't cutting it in the breathlessness department.

To get d_r worked up into a full lather, I suggest viewing the latest Tucker on X:

Ep. 46 The Alex Jones Interview

TIMESTAMPS:

2:46 Alex Jones predictions
15:07 Deplatforming
21:59 Dividing us on race
25:37 The border
28:09 Austin
32:12 New World Order
42:09 Brian Stelter demon video
50:57 Depopulation
1:07:51 Food
1:13:51 Whiskey
1:16:22 Presidential election

I didn't "watch" this. I took it in at 1.5X while out for a walk. The Stelter passage, even audio-only, was precisely why I had always thought Jones a buffoon. I'm still short of fully Jones-pilled in a granular way.

On the one hand, I can understand a Commander-in-Chief undertaking strategic, wartime decisions that are going to cost lives. That is the sheer ugliness of the job.

Understanding that the C-in-C can take wartime, military risks is one thing. The idea that 9/11 was an inside job, and that the C-in-C would sacrifice civilian lives, even to protect "sources and methods" is a harder sell.

That said, the broad sweep of the technocratic New World Order, with the WEF, depopulation, Replacement Theory, and the rest is quite near-fetched. Government corruption, e.g. 06Jan, is obvious and disgusting.

Hot, shrieking denials of the facts unfolding in front of us from d_r are so much insect buzzing.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

d_r's really not trying hard enough More

d_r's really not trying hard enough

Comments Filter:
  • You have acknowledged that there is zero factual support for your Jan06 conspiracy. You have made excuses for why that doesn't matter. On top of that the way your conspiracy is crafted there is no way to ever prove it to be untrue, which makes it just as great of a conspiracy for you as so many others about President Lawnchair and those who were in his orbit when he was in the White House.

    I'll JE the "great replacement" one when you endorse it. You are uber-partisan but there are some bridges you see
    • Your Team has the liars lined up in support, while you lick the boots. What's not to like?

      • Your Team has the liars lined up in support,

        In support of what? You are the one pushing unsupported - and often counterfactual - conspiracies.

        • In support of what?

          Why, the whole WEF/globalist effort to replace Western Civilization with Your Team's techno-Hades.

          • effort to replace Western Civilization with Your Team's techno-Hades.

            Your tendency to substitute conspiracies for actual replies is getting a bit tiring here. If someone was trying to "replace Western Civilization", why are they taking so long to do it?

            • why are they taking so long to do it?

              A whole laundry list of reasons. Why do you think it's taking so long?

              • why are they taking so long to do it?

                A whole laundry list of reasons. Why do you think it's taking so long?

                You should really consider the reasonable possibility that indeed nobody is trying to do that at all. Or you can just keep parroting this in the same way you did with the CRT nonsense.

                • Take a victory lap, already! Gramsci and Marcuse laid out the roadmap, and Your Team has won. You have useless meat puppets at Harvard and in the White House. Just admit how great Your Team is.
                  • No part of that supports your NWO conspiracy. Why the change in topic?
                    • It's all of a godless Commie piece. Props to Your Team for the full-spectrum press.
                    • No, please return to the conspiracy you started with here. You were telling us that some sort of NWO type organization has been primed for takeover since ... Kennedy perhaps? Maybe even earlier? But they haven't finished the job because ... reasons?

                      You have provided no evidence for this whatsoever. Just because it keeps you up at night doesn't mean it is connected to reality. There are likely people who go to sleep afraid of bigfoot just as much as you go to sleep afraid of "leftists taking over th
                    • It would take a raging fool to reject the notion that small numbers of people seek vast amounts of power. Yet you scream and shout "Conspiracy!" from the rooftops in lieu of acknowledging simple human behavior.

                      Support the redistribution of power, not wealth, and I will think you something other than ridiculous.

                    • small numbers of people seek vast amounts of power

                      Why on earth would you think I would argue against that? That's human nature. Fascists like Your Dear Leader like to minimize that number even further, naturally.

                      That simple observation does nothing to support any of your conspiracies though. It certainly doesn't put a time machine in the white house for the two conspiracies you love so dearly that require it.

                    • Nota Bene: The actual "Dear Leader" was the one whose team was driving the show trials.
                    • Just because you disagree with one or more trials does not mean they are automatically "show trials". You could take time to look at the presented evidence and reconsider if that label actually fits.

                      However Your Team is putting on quite the show now in the House. They are drawing up potential impeachment against Biden for ... being a democrat? I guess it shouldn't surprise me that the Fascist party would want to outlaw membership in all other parties, ruling of course is a whole lot easier when there i

                    • Support the redistribution of power, not wealth

                      :-) Tee Hee! Yeah, send him out to chase your wild geese

                    • They're show trials. Never in U.S. history has the legal system been as weaponized as it is by Your Team.

                      Your Team is doing vast damage to our institutions, but Your Team seems to view that as more feature than bug.
                    • Do you want reform, or not?

                    • Sure, but you won't get any from your little ant mill until you realize where it comes from. And "reform" or not, wealth/power is and always will be a singularity

                    • What makes them "show trials"? If they were "show trials" then why did so may people plead guilty? It would be one thing if they were charged with jaywalking or some other trivial offense but these folks from Your Team opted to plead guilty to felony level offenses. They had the right to contest the charges, and some did. Please, show us uninformed citizens what was "show trial" about this.

                      If anything the show trial is the one Your Team has launched from the US House. Starting impeachment before ha

                    • wealth/power is and always will be a singularity

                      Once more, with feeling: "Do you want reform, or not?"

                    • It's a show trial. If you pick at the main charge [reuters.com] of "obstructing", it looks like a case of mental gymnastics [northwestern.edu] on the part of Your Team. However, when one understands that Your Team is merely here to destroy, it becomes clear that the nihilism is a win/win, whether Trump or the legal system itself goes down.
                    • So then why did so many plead guilty to that charge? If they felt it was a bogus charge they should have fought it will ever fiber of their being. Instead many people from Your Team pleaded guilty to felony charges and are doing significant time.

                      And why couldn't Your Dear Leader have bothered to lift a finger to help these people? He knew they wanted to help him when they entered the capitol. If he is as wealthy as he keeps saying he could have hired some better legal representation for them if thes

                    • What I want is irrelevant, separation of wealth/power shall remain impossible, There will be reform when each individual reforms,

                    • when each individual reforms,

                      That's really not how this works, sorry. There will always be a spectrum, within and across individuals.

                    • Doesn't matter, there is no other way.

                    • So then why did so many plead guilty to that charge?

                      We'll have to ask them. I suspect denial of decent council.

                      And why couldn't Your Dear Leader have bothered to lift a finger to help these people?

                      Out of office by the time the Maoist junta got going?

                    • You keep talking about that Way as though you know Him, too.

                    • So then why did so many plead guilty to that charge?

                      We'll have to ask them. I suspect denial of decent council.

                      That's hardly a reason to plead guilty. I am definitely not a lawyer but I know the ramifications of pleading or being found guilty of a felony compared to a misdemeanor and they are severe. If I was charged with a felony offense I would fight with every fiber of my being to avoid that being on my record.

                      And why couldn't Your Dear Leader have bothered to lift a finger to help these people?

                      Out of office

                      He still could have contributed money to their legal defense. He has employed hundreds of lawyers over the years, he could have helped them find legal representation. If he is as wealthy as he likes t

                    • "Him", eh?

Slashdot Top Deals

If I have not seen so far it is because I stood in giant's footsteps.

Close