Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:ChatGPT is not a chess engine (Score 1) 63

That LLM AIs are bad at abstract reasoning of this sort is not a new thing. People have seen that very early on with these systems, such as their inability to prove theorems. If someone thought that an LLM would be good at chess by itself in this situation they haven't been paying attention.

Comment Re: Looting (Score 3, Insightful) 83

As long as you admit that the January 6th criminals are one and the same. I guess all the 3 looters needed to do was say trump won the election and wear a stupid outfit and they can crime away with no consequences.

Yup. And he wants to arrest and prosecute the (actually very few) people who caused (are causing) trouble in LA, so the lesson here is: Wear MAGA stuff and limit your looting, rioting, and property destruction to The Capital building, in DC, then sit back and wait for the pardon ...

For white-collar crimes: Get your mom to donate $1M to Trump and attend Mar-a-Lago dinner, and get pardoned: Trump Pardoned Tax Cheat After Mom Attended $1M Mar-a-Lago Dinner

Comment ChatGPT is not a chess engine (Score 4, Insightful) 63

ChatGPT is not a chess engine. Comparing it to an actual chess system is missing the point. The thing that's impressive about systems like ChatGPT is not that they are better than specialized programs, or that it is better than expert humans, but that it is often much better at many tasks than a random human. I'm reasonably confident that if you asked a random person off the street to play chess this way, they'd likely have a similar performance. And it shouldn't be that surprising, since the actual set of text-based training data that corresponds to a lot of legal chess games is going to be a small fraction of the training data, and since nearly identical chess positions can have radically different outcomes, this is precisely the sort of thing that an LLM is bad at (they are really bad at abstract math for similar reasons). This also has a clickbait element given that substantially better LLM AIs than ChatGPT are now out there, including GPT 4o and Claude. Overall, this comes across as people just moving the goalposts while not recognizing how these systems keep getting better and better.

Comment Ya, no. (Score 1) 24

Gemini will proactively create summary cards when users open a PDF ...

I don't like tech doing thing I didn't ask it to do, so I hope this can be disabled -- not that I'll be using Gemini, if I still have that choice. Also, I don't generally use Google docs, so perhaps this is moot, for now, until Google pushes this out to other areas.

Comment Re:I can't wait for the brouhaha that arises (Score 1) 60

when somebody figures out how to make Barbie say something horrifically inappropriate.
Or better yet if it just happens without any special prompting to do so.

Of course, what will depend on the owner's parent's demographics.
Some places it could just be saying something like, "I deserve equal pay." /s

Comment Re:Despite (Score 2) 271

The documentation people were so afraid that anyone who was not a full-time Word expert would irrecoverably screw up the corporate branding (IOW, formatting) of their docs, they didn't want developers to directly edit them. So I was often able to get away with emailing a quick text summary to them, and they had to do all the fidgety proof reading, formatting, etc.

Perhaps they should have been using something like Framemaker for stuff like that. Admittedly, I only used it *way* back, before it was bought by Adobe.

Comment Re:Despite (Score 1) 271

... the open Office suites work just fine. I've helped people migrate from Microsoft office for years now, no one is complaining. And it is compatible between Windows, MacOS, and Linux.

Yes. As part of my migration from Windows 10 to using my Mint 22 (Cinnamon) system full-time, I've switched all my Word/Excel files over from Office 2010, and a few older files in Lotus WordPro/123 (which run fine on Windows 10, btw) like my budget, to LibreOffice and it does everything I need. The only hold-up here is Publisher, which I use for making greeting cards; I haven't quite nailed down the equivalent workflow in LO. Maybe I need something like Scribus instead? The only other thing is a Linux alternate for AxCrypt v1.7, though some data can be entered into KeePassXC instead...

Comment Re:fake news!!! (Score 2) 100

CPB and the government have been collected data directly from the airlines ever since the aftermath of 9/11 through a number of programs, for example to check passengers against watch lists and to verify the identity of travelers on international flights.

What has changed is that by buying data from a commerical broker instead of a a congressionally instituted program, it bypasses judicial review and limits set by Congress on data collected through those programs -- for example it can track passengers on domestic flights even if they're not on a watch list.

Slashdot Top Deals

The first version always gets thrown away.

Working...