The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The government should not be allowed to conduct a search until a warrant is listed. That means (to my interpretation) that if you are walking in public, the government can not document where you are or when, unless they get a warrant to "tail" you. They should not be allowed to install license plate readers to drag-net search. I feel like that is a violation of the 4th amendment. as is drone surveillance. I feel "surveillance" by the government or by any actor operating on the government's behalf should be illegal until a warrant is issues, describing the thing to be surveilled, which must describe the crime and the specific thing.
You mean when cars spewed leaded gasoline fumes with zero emissions controls, drinking water used lead pipes, asbestos was in everything, and people chain smoked unfiltered cigarettes indoors around children, and the government had hearings to determine who was a filthy communist?
Nope. I mean in the 90s when all of your issues were already resolved, but we didnt have the kind of shit we have in food today. We have gained 20lbs on average from 1990 to today.
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.