Within 10 years, computer will be twice as useful, ten thousand times larger, and so expensive that only the 5 richest kings of Europe will own them

I thought broadband wasn't a public utility. Why are we even allowing them access to public right of way or private property? They should have to pay for that access.

It might be worse than that. I've heard that Canadian Geese are Canadian first, and geese second. This may be a Battle of Algiers moment.

Do you work for a company that has been asked to pay extra so that the packets you are already paying to send reach your customers who have also already paid to be on the Internet?

Zounds, such scumm!

I used to think like this. But I've come to realize that editing, whether by a professional or an AI, is a good thing. It flags when I think I'm being clear, but I'm not. Sometimes that's as simple as reworking a sentence to be less verbose, but other times a simple edit can indicate that the entire paragraph is confusing. LLMs can be quite helpful here, because you can actually ask them what they understand, and they'll give you a good idea of what your readers are actually reading. Even when you are a good writer, it helps to understand what people are actually taking in. A good editor will do this, as will teaching students, but an AI will do it with you all day without complaint and without embarrassment.

Google still works for this sort of thing, even if you've surrendered your common sense to the Callaway Caligula. If you don't like these examples, just search for "emoluments" or "self-dealing" , or "injunction".
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewjerseymonitor.com%2F2...
And
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.bloomberglaw.com%2F...

Because the point of Rust is that it's safe by design. In other words, once you've figured out how to structure your program to make it not do unsafe things, you have a design you can just implement in C and (as long as it's a faithful implementation), and it will also be guaranteed to be safe. The only reason not to is that maintenance is harder that way. It also shows that Rust has to many limits because code that is provably safe by a human cannot be written in Rust without a redesign to meet Rust's more limited understanding of safe.

Are they talking to you right now?

He will not learn because these defeats don't affect him personally. But maybe major corporations will learn that you can't bow low enough to satisfy a tyrant, and soon after break stories on the Presidential Diaper Nurse, and various corporate shakedowns that they experienced.

It's amazing to find people so eager to defend the honor and trustworthiness of billionaires who have repeatedly demonstrated that they-in particular-are not to be trusted. It's like they're apologists for the prosperity gospel as revealed by Herbert Spencer.

I haven't looked at this in a while, but broadcasting over the air allows a station to force the local cable company to carry at least one of it's substations. So the consolation of broadcast ownership will affect cable subscribers as well.

The First Amendment that protects your moronic question here also protects the speech of others which is incalculably more valuable and popular.

The United States is already falling behind in AI. We cannot allow an elite yak gap!

If this guy was smart enough to cobble together a game, he may also have been smart enough to include consent to the wholesale appropriation of your data in the software license agreement.

(I think this would make the charges more difficult to prove, but probably only enough to get him a better plea offer.)