You aren't being entirely fair. For example, the current Secretary of the Army served honorably in the Army where led a cavalry platoon and was deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Then he went to Yale Law School before working in private equity. Anyway, here's a video of him saying we currently have an astronaut on the moon.
Detractors on the left will say he's a delusional moron, because there haven't been any any astronauts on moon for 50 years. But Trump supporters will quickly and accurately point out that we do actually have astronauts in space, which is where the moon is. No doubt up-and-comers like Secretary Driscoll and whoever replaces Ms. Bean will have risen through the ranks of Trump's Meritocracy (TM) and will have just as firm a grasp of obvious facts as the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Defense (who was also in the armed services and has on-air television experience).
I like BlueSky and think it's getting better. Does McMegan consider that the presidential election was driving a lot of the conversation back then?
I ask because her analysis almost always comes off as the laziest way to connect her phobias and enthusiasms with current events. BlueSky has it's faults, but McCardle's lack of traction there can't fairly be attributed to them.
Also, FWIW, an adjudicated rapist, obvious con-man, and florid dementia patient got a plurality of the popular vote, so how good can the American education system pretend to be?
No, Apple's EVP has no risk of being put in jail by contesting the court order.
Yes, they did. It's not open for debate, in view of the judge's order:
"The order, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, demands that an Apple official 'personally responsible for ensuring compliance' appear in court on May 27 'if the parties do not file a joint notice that this issue is resolvedâ¦'"
Personally requiring an executive to appear is a big ol' red flag there, buddy.
Claiming that factories exclusively run on robots is a scare tactic to keep jobs from coming back.
Not exclusively robots, but enough. The first chart in this American Enterprise Institute page tells the tale: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aei.org%2Fcarpe-diem... You can't strawman away 45 years of increasing manufacturing output accompanied by declining manufacturing employment, nor can you Great Pumpkin the jobs back to 1980 levels.
I think I agree that this is being done in good faith (to the court) pending appeal.
Good faith? It's being done in fear of some Apple EVP being tossed in holding and million dollar fines for contempt being imposed until Apple stopped stalling (16 months after losing its appeal of the injunction to the Supreme Court, and 20 days after the Court imposed sanctions, further restrictions, and made clear that its patience was at an end).
There was no good faith. There is fear of the hammer dropping even harder.
The moving cursor writes, and having written, blinks on.