Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Fakeable (Score 2) 28

“There were so many different ways in which you were required to provide absolute proof of your identity these days that life could easily become extremely tiresome just from that factor alone, never mind the deeper existential problems of trying to function as a coherent consciousness in an epistemologically ambiguous physical universe. Just look at cash point machines, for instance. Queues of people standing around waiting to have their fingerprints read, their retinas scanned, bits of skin scraped from the nape of the neck and undergoing instant (or nearly instant-a good six or seven seconds in tedious reality) genetic analysis, then having to answer trick questions about members of their family they didn't even remember they had, and about their recorded preferences for tablecloth colours. And that was just to get a bit of spare cash for the weekend. If you were trying to raise a loan for a jetcar, sign a missile treaty or pay an entire restaurant bill things could get really trying. Hence the Ident-i-Eeze. This encoded every single piece of information about you, your body and your life into one all-purpose machine-readable card that you could then carry around in your wallet, and therefore represented technology's greatest triumph to date over both itself and plain common sense.”

Comment Re:Is this really about impressions? (Score 2) 188

There is a non-monetary cost to posting to a "free speech" platform that caves to right-wing governments' request to deplatform the opposition, is partially owned by the Saudi royal family, and is headed by Musk, who supports a president who uses the FCC and DOJ to punish his political enemies.

We have no idea what bot traffic on Twitter is like now. Twitter's per-acquisition botcounting methodology seemed reasonable. I don't know if things have improved, but I stopped using it when it seemed like it was half Tumpbots and half pornbots.

Comment The smart move is to AI (Score 5, Insightful) 41

Most CEOs add very little value over a replacement CEO. And as part of this equation, most boards overestimate their ability to pick a candidate who will delivery value over replacement and they wildly overpay in their attempt. They would be better off paying some amible middle manager just 10 times the average programmer's salary to network and sift though the proposals generated by AI.

Slashdot Top Deals

You have a massage (from the Swedish prime minister).

Working...