Within 10 years, computer will be twice as useful, ten thousand times larger, and so expensive that only the 5 richest kings of Europe will own them

It might be worse than that. I've heard that Canadian Geese are Canadian first, and geese second. This may be a Battle of Algiers moment.

Do you work for a company that has been asked to pay extra so that the packets you are already paying to send reach your customers who have also already paid to be on the Internet?

Zounds, such scumm!

Google still works for this sort of thing, even if you've surrendered your common sense to the Callaway Caligula. If you don't like these examples, just search for "emoluments" or "self-dealing" , or "injunction".
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewjerseymonitor.com%2F2...
And
https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.bloomberglaw.com%2F...

Are they talking to you right now?

He will not learn because these defeats don't affect him personally. But maybe major corporations will learn that you can't bow low enough to satisfy a tyrant, and soon after break stories on the Presidential Diaper Nurse, and various corporate shakedowns that they experienced.

It's amazing to find people so eager to defend the honor and trustworthiness of billionaires who have repeatedly demonstrated that they-in particular-are not to be trusted. It's like they're apologists for the prosperity gospel as revealed by Herbert Spencer.

I haven't looked at this in a while, but broadcasting over the air allows a station to force the local cable company to carry at least one of it's substations. So the consolation of broadcast ownership will affect cable subscribers as well.

The First Amendment that protects your moronic question here also protects the speech of others which is incalculably more valuable and popular.

The United States is already falling behind in AI. We cannot allow an elite yak gap!

If this guy was smart enough to cobble together a game, he may also have been smart enough to include consent to the wholesale appropriation of your data in the software license agreement.

(I think this would make the charges more difficult to prove, but probably only enough to get him a better plea offer.)

The page clearly says "Klaatu, verata, nictcugh"

He donated thousands of dollars to strip people off their right to marry. That is why he was ousted after 11 days on the job. I'm not sure that he ever said how he voted.

They paid so much more than market price that you have to think this isn't strictly a business move. (This also happened with Twitter and Saudi Arabia.)