
Journal pudge's Journal: Vietnam Never Happened 53
Every day a new story comes out damning Bush's or Kerry's record during the Vietnam War.
I don't know about you, but I just couldn't care less about any of it. Both sides are fully capable both of lying about themselves and their opponents, and it was before I was born, and none of it has any significant bearing on what is going on in the world today.
So, to save my sanity, as far as I am concerned -- for the time being -- the Vietnam War never happened.
Please join me in this crusade to be amnesiacs. We could temporarily change the name to Southeast Asia War Memorial, and pretend it is about the Korean War. We can do this, if we have the collective will!
Pretending...Ummmm..... (Score:2)
Re:Pretending...Ummmm..... (Score:2)
Re:Pretending...Ummmm..... (Score:2)
It was 30 years ago. He moved on. He grew up. I wish all these others would too.
Reminds me of one of my favorite Simpsons moments:
This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Amazing what both the pro-war chickenhawks and anti-war doves forget, isn't it?
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Because when they do, the Democrats -- except a few, like Lieberman -- demonize them.
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Today- but since I live in Oregon, just north of Mexifornia, that isn't surprising at all.
Why is the republican controled governemt still not fully implimenting NAFTA?
From the look of jobs in my state, they are- plenty of Mexican Labor coming up here, construction jobs
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:1)
I like non-protectionist trade policies too, but IIRC, the mexican trucks still have to meet (at least California's) emissions requirements. I'm all for sound trade, but not at the expense of increased smog, etc.
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
However, I would like to remind that evidence is required in here. I won't smack you down for not having it, but if you persist after it's been called for
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
He does seem [slashdot.org] to have some disconnection from reality: Or have I jumped the damn universe again? I guess the real question is- in your universe how many times has the United States use
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
Far too many other countries have means of detecting such things and many of them would have said something about this no matter what they thought of Lybia. Remember that even many of our NATO allies objected rather strongly at the time to the Lybia strike.
The 2 biggest reasons for not using nukes were the USSR and the PRC. No President, not even Reagan would risk MAD over some pissant dictator.
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
There is ONE conventional bomb that could do this- we dropped a whole lotta them on Afghanistan- fuel-air bunker busters. But they are HUGE- and you need a C-130 to drop them from. You're not going to put it in the warhead of a Sidewinder missile.
A third explaination I've heard is that we really fired a lot more than the 4 missiles the Pentagon claime
Re:This shouldn't be too hard for many Republicans (Score:2)
We know the first item is wrong (F-111 not F-11), the third has no factual basis AFAICS, and among other things some of the parts of PanAm flight 103 caused a mushroom cloud in Lockerbie in 1988: hot engine debris impacted a gas station, detonating the fuel in the tanks - which caused a mushroom cloud seen by plenty of eye witnesses.
There is ONE conve
Riiight... (Score:2)
The attack [fff.org] was made by a pair of F-111 fighter-bombers. Their maximum armament was 25,000 pounds [fas.org]. Enough to ruin anyone's day.
If you're going to make accusations, know what you're talking about first.
Huh? (Score:2)
Be what? Who are you?
hey is putin can do it we can too! (Score:2)
Re:hey is putin can do it we can too! (Score:2)
Re:hey is putin can do it we can too! (Score:2)
Re:hey is putin can do it we can too! (Score:1)
Re:hey is putin can do it we can too! (Score:2)
Politics is a realtively new interest of mine (because of Bush) and so I'm not up to date yet. I'm working on it though.
Please (Score:2)
Please tell me we're not going to have to go over Vietnam again every four years?
In 1996, when I voted for the first time as I turned 18, I remember saying, "Ross Perot is going to run every election until I die. He'll outlive me just to do it, I swear." I was glad to be wrong on that, and I hope Vietnam as a relevant-to-the-Presidency issue goes the same way.
Re:Please (Score:2)
I certainly hope not. There came a year when the first President born in the 20th century was elected (JFK, beating Nixon by a negligible margin after a highly questionable election), presumably we'll soon get an election returning the first president too young to have been involved.
In 1996, when I voted for the first time as I turned 18, I remember saying, "Ross Perot is going to run every election until I die. He'll outli
Re:Please (Score:2)
Or at least we can start dwelling on my past instead of the irrelevant stuff that came before I was born. ;)
Re:pls resection to humor, tnx. (Score:2)
What!? (Score:2)
We could temporarily change the name to Southeast Asia War Memorial, and pretend it is about the Korean War.
When did they move Korea to southeast Asia!?
Why am I always the last person to hear about these things?
Re:What!? (Score:2)
I thought about that, but calling it East Asia was just too broad. But you called me out!
really? (Score:2)
Really?
You know, in 92 and 96, the Republicans kept saying, over and over, that character was an issue. How the candidates behaved when their country asked them to become citizen-soldiers has no bearing on their character? Whether they have told the truth about it in recent years tells us nothing about character?
Re:really? (Score:2)
And when they said it in 92 and 96, I didn't think what Clinton did in the 60s mattered. I thought what he did in the 80s and 90s mattered. If you wanna talk about the last 10-15 years, fine.
Re:really? (Score:2)
The lessons of history (Score:2)
Communists are strong, and their perserverance is not to be taken lightly. They are out to save the world from the Capitalists.
Don't try to "contain" problems, instead press until you have a decisive victory.
From George Orwell: "Whoever controls the image and information of the past determines what and how future generations will think; whoever controls the information and images of the
Re:The lessons of history (Score:2)
The USSR collapsed and the Chinese are gung-ho capitalists now.
Re:The lessons of history (Score:2)
The Russians are pretty unhappy with their gangsta-capitalism. Most live in third-world poverty. I expect to see some form of communism return to the ol' USSR.
The Communist party still runs China. Where it's capitalism as a tool of communism. But I do think the Chinese are evolving from communism to capitalism in the proper manner.
Re:The lessons of history (Score:2)
None of the remaining communists really can be said to have much in the way of a global movement. The closest I can think of is Castro backing Chavez in Venuzuela. Even then its a pretty lukwarm relationship.
The Chinese aren't interested in exporting revolution nor are any of the remaining comminists in the former USSR. Even if the communist party comes back into power in Russia I doubt it will necessarily be any more hostile to the US or EU t
Re:The lessons of history (Score:2)
I also agree the primary threat is terrorism, but I also believe that long-term, the best way to fight terrorism is to change the Middle East to be more prosperous and more democratic. Otherwise, we are playing whack-a-mole for the next 50 or 100 years.
SIGN ME UP (Score:2)
I told someone just this morning, when we were discussing history, that the only part of history that does not interest me is the Vietnam war. It may interest me again after the election. Right now, it does not.
Personally this thing happened before I was born. I DON'T CARE. I didn't care then, and I sure don't care now. People died, and that's always horrible. But as for who did what at the time, it makes me no difference.
What war?
Vietnam? (Score:2)
I deny history before my birth.
In fact, perhaps time ran backwards before I was born. I have no proof.
In fact, I think I might be Descartes........
It's almost as if Kerry et al are fighting the arguments of years ago against Clinton.
Pudge for King! (Of the area sometimes know as Southeast-But-More-East Asia)
Watergate (Score:2)
Can we please add Watergate to the list of things that never happened?!
If Watergate never happened, we need no longer have too many Bernstein/Woodward-wannabes running around trying to reveal 'smoking guns' in every public statement of every public official. (Sadly, the wannabes always seem to forget that the reason Bernstein/Woodward were able to reveal their 'smoking gun' was their meticulous and time-consuming checking and double-checking and then checkin
Re:Watergate (Score:2)
Re:Watergate (Score:2)
I would/could argue that this is a consequence of Watergate.
The only thing people seem to remember of Watergate is that President Nixon lied and Bernstein/Woodward didn't. Ergo: politicians lie, the media doesn't. Therefore: if the media reports that person X told fibs while person X claims to have told the truth, then we believe the reporting in the media, especially if person X is a
Re:Watergate (Score:2)
I assume that lying all the time is part of the job description of any public office holder. If a public official says the sky is blue I go outside to check for myself.
I consider Government to be a necessary evil that is not to be trusted no matter who is running it.